|
Its a matrox workstation graphics card. I did wonder if it was something like sub optimal 64bit graphics drivers.
I'm using the Aero, but the one below it as I'm on the business version - does not support Aero. Could not see any difference between it and clasic.
This is all food for thought. Will look at how things are being drawn. I'm using a third party graph control, but do have the code for it. Will have a look at how its rendering itself. There are a number of different graphs that are on different tab conrols, and I wonder if even though they are not visible, by being stacked, they are all rendering themselves now. If so thats a problem.
Thank,
Giles
|
|
|
|
|
Actually what happens(internally) when we restart the system? please explain me 
-- modified at 1:49 Friday 26th January, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
When you start up the system from cold, or set a particular voltage on the processor's RESET pin (your computer may have a hard reset switch that does this), the CPU starts executing code from a fixed location. This memory location is in the BIOS ROM chip. The processor starts up in what's known as 16-bit real mode.
In order to restart the computer, therefore, the operating system disables everything that won't work in that mode, switches to 16-bit real mode, then jumps to the starting location in the BIOS. As I recall, one of the processor's registers is set to a specific value, different from the processor's default values on switch-on or hard reset, so the BIOS can take different actions - traditionally, a warm boot skipped most of the power-on self-testing. In DOS, the Ctrl+Alt+Del key combination was used to perform a warm boot, and now you know how it worked.
When it starts up, the BIOS performs initialisation on various devices and performs tests on them, then calls any expansion ROMs (such as the video BIOS on the video card), then looks for a boot sector. This is the first sector on any disk or disk-like device it supports (some now support booting from USB sticks). When it finds one, it loads that into RAM, then executes it. From this point on, it's the boot sector's responsibility to continue the boot.
If you really want to know what happens from here, read "Windows Internals, 4th Edition" by Mark Russinovich and David Solomon.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Mr.Mike. your reply to my question is ver useful. thank you very much
Arise Awake Stop Not Till ur Goal is Reached.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a .NET component that I have registered in COM+ on the remote machine. I'm trying to create an object off that machine on my local machine in a VBA application, but I get RTE 462, "Remote server machine not available..."
Where do I start looking to resolve this issue? My local machine is XP SP2, server is Windows Server 2003 SP1.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all! I am not sure if this is right place to ask this question, but I have always received excellent information from the ppl on this forum, so here it goes.
The problems I am having started a couple of months ago, before that everything worked pretty smoothly for a couple of years.
We have a MSW 2003 domain controller. At this moment, none of the computers that are logged into the domain show up in the network (Network Places--> Entire Network--> Microsoft Windows Network --> 'Network Name'). This is true for both the server and all computers in the network. This problem started when we had to change to a different NIC on the board due to the other one going bad. I also tried another NIC after that with the same problem. Heres the strange part. You can do a search for the computers by name and they will be found (either \\computername or doing a start-->search-->computername).
I made sure all of the DNS info is the same across all computers. I have the default setting for NETBios. I have the domain controller as the first DNS (Which it is also a DNS server) for all machines. All computers show up in AD.
I triple checked to make sure all of the settings for the new NIC were the same as the one we previously used.
I am at loss. Any direction would be helpful and appreciated.
Jude
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
which book should i refer to know internals of the FAT32 file system.
actually i want to write a program that will be able to
read the file system but it runs without kernel.
(it's in embedded domain.)
Thanks and regards
Harshal shete
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
can CPU temperature be measured by reading a memory map(SMBIOS viewer)I do not want to use wmi for directly reading the CPU temperature. coz that is hardware dependant.? is it possible by reading memory map and then calculating from it?
If yes, please let me know how should i proceed.
Thanks in advance
manasi
-- modified at 8:33 Monday 22nd January, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
Manasi D wrote: is it possible by reading memory map
Nope. Usually that value is read from an I/O port by a device driver. This is actually far more hardware dependant than WMI. WMI supplies a consistant interface for vendors to use to supply your app this information. But, it only works if the manufacturer of the MoBo supplies a WMI Provider for their boards - most do NOT do this.
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you so much for your reply.
Actually only since wmi is not supported by most of the manufacturers, I wanted to read memory map ..though more h/w dependant.
I thought, if I have a memory map of a machine, i will surely be able to calculate cpu temp on that particular machine.
..manasi
|
|
|
|
|
Manasi D wrote: I wanted to read memory map
The "memory locations", or I/O port numbers, you're talking about change from chipset to chipset. You'd have to write code to detect the chipset the mobo uses, then look at the correct spots, then do any math necessary, and correctly, to calculate the value you're looking for. I'd rather have the manufacturer do that for me instead of me having to support dozens of modules to get the values you want.
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
i have one doubt what it means that whether the AMD and INTEL software are same or different when i installing into the system.i am having AMD processor i lossed my motherboard cd u just tell that whether i get motherboard cd or not
     ;P    ;)  suss:
|
|
|
|
|
Open the computer, Look on the motherbouar for their product id, And go to their site and download drivers, manuals, ...
But it will not be the same as CD.
and AMD or intell processor isn't going make any diffrance. The only thing is important is manufactior and Product ID.
How old is your motherboard, Does all required driver included in your OS (Windows XP, Linux) system? If so you don't need it
|
|
|
|
|
I have used DataGridView in my application with 4 columns and 10 rows each row contain with number only, HOw can i sum the value in each row. Please give me an example?
Thanks
................
|
|
|
|
|
A few problems here:
You are in the wrong forum.
Missing data, such as what kind of database, what language?
Create new thread in appropriate forum, or are you asking how to use calculator.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows use a UNC address to access one of my local volumes but i want windows to use a drive letter to access it?
reza
|
|
|
|
|
Where is that entry (upload a screenshot somewhere), what does it say, and what do you want it to say?
Cheers,
Sebastian
--
Contra vim mortem non est medicamen in hortem.
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen this problem periodically during writing data(Synchron or Asynchron) on a DVD-RAM :
Windows Delayed Write Failed!
|
|
|
|
|
My friends i need answer for my problem please. first now i will tell you about my computer the CPU 1.7,hard 80 GByte RAM 182 SD_RAM and the operating system which used windowsXp
the problem is when turn it don't complete but if i restart it will complete.
|
|
|
|
|
When you first turn it on, it won't start, but if you restart, it will ? When did you last install Windows ? From the specs, I'd say this is an old PC, have you ever reinstalled windows ? It does get itself messed up over time. You can boot from the XP cd and get XP to repair itself, I'd try that first.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog
|
|
|
|
|
I installed a printer on my Win2k3 server box on my WORKGROUP LAN at home, and set it up to be a shared printer.
However, when I try to add a network printer on my other LAN boxes (all are Win2K/SP4), I get various messages saying the printer isn't available, or isn't connected, and things like that.
Can someone list some things to check?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have any clients connected to my server so I can't test this, but you might give it a try. In the Sharing tab of the printer properties there's a checkbox to "List in the directory." Check it and see if that helps.
I searched for a while last night trying to figure this one out, since I'll be running into it one day, too. All I can find is Microsoft's instructions to share the printer and advertise it. Searching on "advertise" returns absolutely nothing of interest, of course, and there are no instructions anywhere about how to do that. Maybe listing it in the directory will advertise it, like a yellow pages ad.
On the other hand, it might just mean that the printer will get a lot of calls from aluminum siding salesmen and vendors of Cialis, too. Who knows? Maybe after having several parts of its anatomy enlarged, the printer will feel more comfortable sharing itself. It's worth a try, I guess...
"...a photo album is like Life, but flat and stuck to pages." - Shog9
|
|
|
|
|
This is a Win2k3 server.
There is no checkbox anywhere in the sharing dialog that says "List in the directory". On the sharing tab, there's a pair of radio buttons that say
- Do not share this printer
- Share this printer
If you select "Share this printer", you can give the printer a name.
I can print from the server, but I can't connect to the printer from any other box (all of which are running Win2K/SP4) on the network.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: This is a Win2k3 server.
Yes, I know... So's mine.
And the "List in the directory" check box is there, bigger than s&*t, right under the text box for the share name.
Maybe it's a Lexmark thing, but I doubt it. My OS is Win2K3, Small Business Premium, SP1. Could that make a difference?
While I'm on it, does the LAN adapter have Microsoft File and Printer Sharing installed? I wouldn't recommend doing that on the WAN adapter, but you should have that on the LAN side, just in case you haven't checked.;)
There might be some permissions issues, too - Win2K3 has a bunch of them.
"...a photo album is like Life, but flat and stuck to pages." - Shog9
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote: And the "List in the directory" check box is there, bigger than s&*t, right under the text box for the share name.
The only other thing on that tab is the "additional drivers" button. :/
Roger Wright wrote: Maybe it's a Lexmark thing, but I doubt it.
It might be...
Roger Wright wrote: My OS is Win2K3, Small Business Premium, SP1. Could that make a difference?
Mine is Enterprise version with SP1. Seems to me if yours has that checkbox, mine should definitely have it unless it's lexmark specific.
Roger Wright wrote: hile I'm on it, does the LAN adapter have Microsoft File and Printer Sharing installed? I wouldn't recommend doing that on the WAN adapter, but you should have that on the LAN side, just in case you haven't checked.
Yeah, that's he first thing I checked when I encountered the problem.
Roger Wright wrote: There might be some permissions issues, too - Win2K3 has a bunch of them.
I looked at the permisssions thing, and as far as I can tell, everything is okay.
I figured since this is all on a WORKGROUP network, it should just work...
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
