|
Hi was looking at codeproject stuffs and have seen that all codeproject wallpapers are of low resolutions.
CodeProject Stuff - CodeProject[^]
Since most of the new machines are Full HD, I would suggest to have link for full HD (and higher resolution) wallpapers too. 
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah!!
Also, since my (and other peoples, AKAIK) one-third of screen from left is filled with icons.
It would be nice if codeproject puppet would move to bottom-right instead of left-bottom.
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|
Anurag Gandhi wrote: would be nice if codeproject puppet would move to bottom-right instead of left-bottom
That was fairly easy to do. Here you go :
http://i.imgur.com/jfUJI1p.png[^]
I added some padding at the bottom for the task bar. Obviously this is now an unofficial version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The links you've provided are the same, and that link works with and without a .aspx extension. Which link (and where did you see it) didn't work?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I believe the codeproject.com SPF record is not a valid string. The DNS query display looks nice, readable to humans, but when its unravel and concatenated by code, the SPF record has missing spaces resulting in a permanent error. Like the first "v=spf1 " has has trailing space, the others lines do not have a trailing space. This is why we haven't been seeing notifications because codeproject.com is expected to have a SPF record and resulting in a PASS. No SPF Record (permerror) means rejection. Hope it can get resolved quickly. I am not going to get to get any notifications until the SPF record is fixed. Thanks
codeproject.com text =
"v=spf1 "
"ip4:76.74.234.204"
"ip4:76.74.234.192/27"
"ip4:65.39.148.44"
"ip4:65.39.148.24/29"
"ip4:65.39.148.32/27"
"ip4:207.219.70.54"
"ip4:207.219.70.1/24"
"a:mail.maillist.codeproject.com"
"a:mail.codeproject.com"
"a:lakequincy.com"
"include:_spf.google.com"
"include:mktomail.com"
"~all""
Post edit: This is what it appears like when read by a DNS client, no spaces w/ the splitting of lines. A SPF parser will return a permanent error with this invalid record.
v=spf1 ip4:76.74.234.204ip4:76.74.234.192/27ip4:65.39.148.44ip4:65.39.148.24/
29ip4:65.39.148.32/27ip4:207.219.70.54ip4:207.219.70.1/
24a:mail.maillist.codeproject.coma:mail.codeproject.coma:lakequincy.
cominclude:_spf.google.cominclude:mktomail.com~all"
modified 29-Dec-15 14:13pm.
|
|
|
|
|
We're looking into it right now. Thanks
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Sure. For your records, just add a trailing space before ending double quotes or unravel the records into one long string with the proper spaces in between directives.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, when a DNS client does the query, I don't think the "client" would be expected to should add a "space" at the end of each line separated by a <cr><lf> pair. Each line will be concatenated without a space. I was one of the original implementers of SPF back in 2003 with WCSAP (wcSAP - Wildcat! Sender Authentication Protocol[^]) and daily statistic since that time ()[^].
I haven't seen the fix yet. 
Have a good day.
|
|
|
|
|
The codeproject.com SPF record is now fixed.
This is some anti-spam advice. When you first added a SPF, you had a -ALL hard failure. This was great because it allowed for fast deterministic rejections of spoofed codeproject.com domain mail. The current one is a SOFTFAIL (~ALL) result which means that receiver systems are no longer sure because YOU are no longer sure. So we most systems WILL NOT reject it. What it does is add pressure to the receiver system to perform heuristic and "iffy" subjective filtering systems and overall, it makes it much harder to filter the spam. The CODE is more complex. You relaxed for business reasons of course, you have "partners" out there that is sending junk to us perhaps. So be it.
But if you want to protect against negative branding of your codeproject.com domain, you will need something stronger. Today, that would be DMARC.
To use a softfail, you will need to add DMARC record to bring back some fast anti-spoofing deterministic. I don't know your mail is DKIM signed, so you will need to do that as well, you can't do DMARC without doing DKIM. Here is a WIZARD that I recently put today for the newer DMARC thing.
[^]
All that just because you switched from -ALL to ~ALL SPF record.
Anyway, thanks for the SPF change.
|
|
|
|
|
hector santos wrote: You relaxed for business reasons of course, you have "partners" out there that is sending junk to us perhaps.
No we don't.
I'll pass on your suggestions to the guys in charge of our network and get them to take a look.
All I want is email to work safely, securely and reliably. I've never understood why it's all so hard.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When a message is on moderation and reported as spam by a protector, there will be email notifications if the message is a reply to a forum message or posted on an article forum. They are also shown on top of the page (new messages).
This can be really annoying.
|
|
|
|
|
We've backed ourselves into a corner, architecturally, on that one. We can fix it but it'll need a serious overhaul of the workflow. I'll add it to the TODO.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Don't you hate it when that happens?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to submit an article update without having a silent encoding in <pre> blocs ?
I want to do this in the article:
<TODOLIST PROJECTNAME="My TaskList" FILEFORMAT="10">
<TASK TITLE="My first Task">
<TASK TITLE="My sub task">
<COMMENTS>My comments</COMMENTS>
<CATEGORY>MyCat</CATEGORY>
</TASK>
</TASK>
<TASK TITLE="My second Task">
</TASK>
</TODOLIST>
<span class="highlight" ><TODOLIST <span style="background-color:lime">PROJECTNAME=</span><span style="background-color:pink">"My TaskList"</span> <span style="background-color:lime">FILEFORMAT=</span><span style="background-color:pink">"10"</span>></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"><TASK <span style="background-color:lime">TITLE=</span><span style="background-color:pink">"My first Task"</span>></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"><TASK <span style="background-color:lime">TITLE=</span><span style="background-color:pink">"My sub task"</span>></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"><COMMENTS><span style="background-color:turquoise">My comments</span></COMMENTS></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"><CATEGORY><span style="background-color:turquoise">MyCat</span></CATEGORY></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"></TASK></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"></TASK></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"><TASK <span style="background-color:lime">TITLE=</span><span style="background-color:pink">"My second Task"</span>></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"></TASK></span>
<span class="highlight" ></TODOLIST></span>
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
All markup except specific (eg span highlight and B/I) are automatically encoded. Yes, this stops you doing crazy stuff like you're suggesting, but on balance it avoids a TON of messed up HTML in code blocks.
You could wrap the markup you want in TT tags with a background colour:
<TODOLIST PROJECTNAME="My TaskList" FILEFORMAT="10">
<TASK TITLE="My first Task">
<TASK TITLE="My sub task">
<COMMENTS>My comments</COMMENTS>
<CATEGORY>MyCat</CATEGORY>
</TASK>
</TASK>
<TASK TITLE="My second Task">
</TASK>
</TODOLIST>
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: You could wrap the markup you want in TT tags with a background colour:
OK will try.
What is not fun is that the wysiwyg editor don't follow the same rules.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I'm consider a new member here although I have joined this site about 4 months ago but seldom to contribute or ask questions here.
Until yesterday, I wanted to help some of the developer to solve their problem, their code are not formatted. It's hard to read their code. Can we help them to format so it is more readable ? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
You can edit questions and reformat their code in Quick Answers
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't he need Silver reputation first?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if you're going to get all technical on me...
(OK, yes. You're correct)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
How many points are considered as Silver reputation ?
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on the track, but 500 or 1000. You can see the list here at the bottom:
Member Reputation System
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
