|
Sure. For your records, just add a trailing space before ending double quotes or unravel the records into one long string with the proper spaces in between directives.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, when a DNS client does the query, I don't think the "client" would be expected to should add a "space" at the end of each line separated by a <cr><lf> pair. Each line will be concatenated without a space. I was one of the original implementers of SPF back in 2003 with WCSAP (wcSAP - Wildcat! Sender Authentication Protocol[^]) and daily statistic since that time ()[^].
I haven't seen the fix yet. 
Have a good day.
|
|
|
|
|
The codeproject.com SPF record is now fixed.
This is some anti-spam advice. When you first added a SPF, you had a -ALL hard failure. This was great because it allowed for fast deterministic rejections of spoofed codeproject.com domain mail. The current one is a SOFTFAIL (~ALL) result which means that receiver systems are no longer sure because YOU are no longer sure. So we most systems WILL NOT reject it. What it does is add pressure to the receiver system to perform heuristic and "iffy" subjective filtering systems and overall, it makes it much harder to filter the spam. The CODE is more complex. You relaxed for business reasons of course, you have "partners" out there that is sending junk to us perhaps. So be it.
But if you want to protect against negative branding of your codeproject.com domain, you will need something stronger. Today, that would be DMARC.
To use a softfail, you will need to add DMARC record to bring back some fast anti-spoofing deterministic. I don't know your mail is DKIM signed, so you will need to do that as well, you can't do DMARC without doing DKIM. Here is a WIZARD that I recently put today for the newer DMARC thing.
[^]
All that just because you switched from -ALL to ~ALL SPF record.
Anyway, thanks for the SPF change.
|
|
|
|
|
hector santos wrote: You relaxed for business reasons of course, you have "partners" out there that is sending junk to us perhaps.
No we don't.
I'll pass on your suggestions to the guys in charge of our network and get them to take a look.
All I want is email to work safely, securely and reliably. I've never understood why it's all so hard.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When a message is on moderation and reported as spam by a protector, there will be email notifications if the message is a reply to a forum message or posted on an article forum. They are also shown on top of the page (new messages).
This can be really annoying.
|
|
|
|
|
We've backed ourselves into a corner, architecturally, on that one. We can fix it but it'll need a serious overhaul of the workflow. I'll add it to the TODO.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Don't you hate it when that happens?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to submit an article update without having a silent encoding in <pre> blocs ?
I want to do this in the article:
<TODOLIST PROJECTNAME="My TaskList" FILEFORMAT="10">
<TASK TITLE="My first Task">
<TASK TITLE="My sub task">
<COMMENTS>My comments</COMMENTS>
<CATEGORY>MyCat</CATEGORY>
</TASK>
</TASK>
<TASK TITLE="My second Task">
</TASK>
</TODOLIST>
<span class="highlight" ><TODOLIST <span style="background-color:lime">PROJECTNAME=</span><span style="background-color:pink">"My TaskList"</span> <span style="background-color:lime">FILEFORMAT=</span><span style="background-color:pink">"10"</span>></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"><TASK <span style="background-color:lime">TITLE=</span><span style="background-color:pink">"My first Task"</span>></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"><TASK <span style="background-color:lime">TITLE=</span><span style="background-color:pink">"My sub task"</span>></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"><COMMENTS><span style="background-color:turquoise">My comments</span></COMMENTS></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"><CATEGORY><span style="background-color:turquoise">MyCat</span></CATEGORY></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"></TASK></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"></TASK></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"><TASK <span style="background-color:lime">TITLE=</span><span style="background-color:pink">"My second Task"</span>></span>
<span style="background-color:salmon"></TASK></span>
<span class="highlight" ></TODOLIST></span>
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
All markup except specific (eg span highlight and B/I) are automatically encoded. Yes, this stops you doing crazy stuff like you're suggesting, but on balance it avoids a TON of messed up HTML in code blocks.
You could wrap the markup you want in TT tags with a background colour:
<TODOLIST PROJECTNAME="My TaskList" FILEFORMAT="10">
<TASK TITLE="My first Task">
<TASK TITLE="My sub task">
<COMMENTS>My comments</COMMENTS>
<CATEGORY>MyCat</CATEGORY>
</TASK>
</TASK>
<TASK TITLE="My second Task">
</TASK>
</TODOLIST>
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: You could wrap the markup you want in TT tags with a background colour:
OK will try.
What is not fun is that the wysiwyg editor don't follow the same rules.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I'm consider a new member here although I have joined this site about 4 months ago but seldom to contribute or ask questions here.
Until yesterday, I wanted to help some of the developer to solve their problem, their code are not formatted. It's hard to read their code. Can we help them to format so it is more readable ? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
You can edit questions and reformat their code in Quick Answers
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't he need Silver reputation first?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if you're going to get all technical on me...
(OK, yes. You're correct)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
How many points are considered as Silver reputation ?
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on the track, but 500 or 1000. You can see the list here at the bottom:
Member Reputation System
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFOX wrote: Does any of the admins want to deal with this?
Yes we do.
Given it's the Christmas break we're a little slow, but we'll certainly have a word with the offending party.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Many thanks!
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
It's Wordpress.com so this is an easier one. I filed the DMCA report with Wordpress.com, now we wait for the wheels of justice to turn.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
The blog post has been removed now. Thanks!
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: I filed the DMCA report with Wordpress.com
Does that cost you money? Or do Wordpress fit the bill?
|
|
|
|
|
... put it on "My Settings" webpage somewhere.
It's just plain hideous where it now STANDS. I don't know why it bothers me so much but it just does. Or you could remove it altogether.
It started appearing a few months ago in both IE and Firefox.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd disagree - it's in a relatively sensible place.
"Settings" would be odd, given that you have no control over it and can't change it yourself.
It needs to be somewhere, and at least it's easy to find - particularly if you are new to the site. If you don't like it, don't look at your own page!  (You only see it on your own page, I can't see it on yours)
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
