Click here to Skip to main content
15,885,366 members
Articles / Desktop Programming / WPF
Technical Blog

Bind Markup Extension

Rate me:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
4.86/5 (3 votes)
25 Nov 2013CPOL4 min read 11.4K   3  
I continue a series of blog posts about implementing WPF concepts outside of WPF.

I continue a series of blog posts about implementing WPF concepts outside of WPF.

Even though, the purpose of these articles is to show how to implement and use WPF concepts outside of WPF, WPF and XAML application are still the major beneficiaries of this new approach which will allow to e.g. create bindings between properties on the non-visual View Models or extend the non-visual View Models (by using AProperties) without modifying the View Model code. Because of this, it makes sense to create a XAML markup extension for the non-WFP binding described in Composite Path Bindings outside of WPF. This article talks about creating and using such markup extension.

The source code for this blog post is located under BindMarkupExtensionCode.zip link.

Bind Extension

To distinguish the new markup extension from WPF’s Binding markup extension, we’ll call it Bind or BindExtension.

BindExtension class is located under NP.Paradigms.Windows project. It extends System.Windows.Markup.MarkupExtension class. It has the following public properties that can be set in XAML:

  1. Source – allows to specify the binding source object. If Source property is not specified, we are trying to figure out the source object from other properties e.g., SourceElementName described below. If nothing helps, the source object is assumed to be the same as the target object (we still have no notion similar to the DataContext in WPF bindings). 
  2. SourceElementName – is similar to ElementName of WPF binding. It allows to specify a named XAML element to serve as the Binding‘s source. 
  3. SourcePath – a string that specifies the path of the binding relative to the binding’s Source object. The path links are separated by periods (‘.’). The plain properties are specified as strings. The WPF attached or dependency properties are placed within parentheses. The AProperties are placed within two asterisks. Here is a composite path sample: MyPlainProp.(this:MyAttachedProps.MyTestAttachedProp).*this:MyTestAProps.MyTestAProp*. This path is looks for AProperty MyTestAProps.MyTestAProp within an object defined by an attached property MyAttachedProps.MyTestAttachedProp within an object defined by a plain property MyPlainProp of the source object of the binding. Both attached property and AProperty are defined within the current project specified by XAML prefix “this:”. 
  4. TargetPath – a string that specifies the path to the target of the binding with respect to the target binding object and the target property. Unlike the WPF binding our composite path binding allows to specify a composite target path (see Composite Path Bindings outside of WPF). The first link or the target path will always be the target property defined within XAML. The subsequent links can be defined by TargetPath string. Here is a XAML example <Grid DataContext={Bind TargetPath="MyProp"...}. This example will not set the DataContext property on the grid. Instead it will use DataContext property as the first link in the target binding and will modify DataContext.MyProp property instead (if it exists, of course). If TargetPath is not specified, the XAML target property will be modified. 
  5. TheBindType – similar to WPF binding’s Mode. Here are the possible values
    • OneWay – binding from source to target property
    • OneWayReverse – binding from target to source property (similar to WPF’s OneWayToSource)
    • TwoWay – binds source and target properties together so that when one of them changes, the other changes also. The initial value is set from source to target.
    • TwoWayReverseInit – binds source and target properties together so that when one of them changes, the other changes also. The initial value is set from target to source.

Usage Samples

Project XamlBindingTests shows how to use the BindExtension in XAML. The relevant XAML code is located within MainWindow.xaml file. Here is how the test application looks:

TestApp

Test1 demonstrates attaching plain property to dependency property using Bind extension. Text property of a TextBlock is bound to MyTestProp property of a resource object MyTestDataObj_Test1:

XML
<TextBlock Text="{winparadigms:Bind Source={StaticResource MyTestDataObj_Test1},
                                SourcePath=MyTestProp}"
       Grid.Column="1"/>

When a button “Add Value to Plain Prop” is clicked the property of the resource object is added “_hi” at the end and the binding transfers the corresponding change to the Text property of the TextBlock object. 

Test2 shows how to set the binding in both directions – from a Text property on TextBox to a resource object and from the resource object to the Text property on a TextBlock:

XML
<TextBox Width="100"
      Height="25"
      Text="{winparadigms:Bind Source={StaticResource MyTestDataObj_Test2},
                             SourcePath=MyTestProp,
                             TheBindType=OneWayReverse}"/>

<TextBlock Text="{winparadigms:Bind Source={StaticResource MyTestDataObj_Test2},
                                SourcePath=MyTestProp}"
       Grid.Column="1" />

When you start typing in the TextBox the TextBlock text shows next to it.

Test3 demos a two TwoWay bindings – one from a TextBox to a resource object and the other from the same resource object back to a different text box. The two text boxes are thus bound in both directions via a resource object: 

XML
<TextBox Width="100"
    Height="25"
    Text="{winparadigms:Bind Source={StaticResource MyTestDataObj_Test3},
                            SourcePath=MyTestProp,
                            TheBindType=TwoWayReverseInit}" />

<TextBox Width="100"
  Height="25"
  Text="{winparadigms:Bind Source={StaticResource MyTestDataObj_Test3},
                         SourcePath=MyTestProp,
                         TheBindType=TwoWay}"
  Grid.Column="1" />

Test4 shows how to use SourceElementName to bind Text properties in two TextBox objects:

XML
<TextBox Width="100"
        Height="25"
        Text="{winparadigms:Bind SourceElementName=TextBoxToMatch,
                                SourcePath=(TextBox.Text),
                                TheBindType=TwoWay}" />
<TextBox Width="100"
      Height="25"
      x:Name="TextBoxToMatch"
      Text="Text to match"
      Grid.Column="1" /> 

Finally Test5 shows how to bind an AProperty. The AProperty this:MyAProps.MyTestAProp is defined on the resource object MyTestDataObj_Test5. It is bound to its own plain property MyTestProp

XML
<this:MyTestData x:Key="MyTestDataObj_Test5"
                  this:MyAProps.MyTestAProp="{winparadigms:Bind SourcePath=MyTestProp, TheBindType=TwoWay}"
                  MyTestProp="InitialValue" />

Also one TextBox of Test5 binds its Text to the plain MyTestProp of the resource object MyTestDataObj_Test5, while the other TextBox of the test binds to the AProperty:

XML
<TextBox Width="100"
     Height="25"
     Text="{winparadigms:Bind Source={StaticResource MyTestDataObj_Test5},
                              SourcePath=MyTestProp,
                              TheBindType=TwoWay}" />
<TextBox Width="100"
     Height="25"
     Text="{winparadigms:Bind Source={StaticResource MyTestDataObj_Test5},
                              SourcePath=*this:MyAProps.MyTestAProp*,
                              TheBindType=TwoWay}"
     Grid.Column="2" />

Thus the two TextBoxes are bound together via a plain property and an AProperty on a resource object.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)


Written By
Architect AWebPros
United States United States
I am a software architect and a developer with great passion for new engineering solutions and finding and applying design patterns.

I am passionate about learning new ways of building software and sharing my knowledge with others.

I worked with many various languages including C#, Java and C++.

I fell in love with WPF (and later Silverlight) at first sight. After Microsoft killed Silverlight, I was distraught until I found Avalonia - a great multiplatform package for building UI on Windows, Linux, Mac as well as within browsers (using WASM) and for mobile platforms.

I have my Ph.D. from RPI.

here is my linkedin profile

Comments and Discussions

 
-- There are no messages in this forum --