|
According to my reputation history, my tip/trick just got downvoted, but there are no new comments. I thought downvotes required a comment to be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
I spent last night reworking the tips/tricks voting and just discovered (and fixed) this issue. As soon as I get a chance to upload it will be better.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Too late, suckers! I'm going on a downvote spree and nobody will know what hit them. Mwahahahaha!
|
|
|
|
|
After load testing the code I had in this article:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/silverlight/LSHTMLAPP.aspx
I have decided to delete it and write another article using another method
Can you please delete it?
|
|
|
|
|
No problem. It is currently locked by you for editing, but as soon as it is not we will delete it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for being so lame, but I honestly looked and cannot figure out how to 'unlock the article' 
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it's common knowledge 
Every time you go into edit an article, that article becomes locked for 20 mins. So, amusingly enough, by going in to figure out how to unlock your article, you've locked it again 
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
The the answer is "just do nothing"
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: So, amusingly enough, by going in to figure out how to unlock your article, you've locked it again
It's not a bug, it's a feature
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: It's not a bug, it's a feature
It is indeed. Shouldn't lazy programming be supported by CP as well
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a weak referenced editor.
|
|
|
|
|
Just edit the article with a new download and article content.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried searching for this topic but of course, it didn't work.
I searched for "sql statement generator" and got nothing. I put the same thing in Google and got the article I was looking for as the second result.
Thomas
|
|
|
|
|
works for me[^]
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
I tried this in the search box on the home page and got SQL Statement Generator by Chris Hambleton as the first result, the same as Google. Could you describe the steps you took, and what results you did get.
Matthew Dennis
Senior Developer
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
From the main page at www.codeproject.com in the Search Articles box I typed "sql statement generator". I clicked the Go! button and got no results. I tried it several times before I posted. I tried this just a couple of minutes ago and got nothing. I tried it one more time just now and it works. So I guess, never mind. Something wasn't working and now it is. Thanks for the replies.
|
|
|
|
|
One of our Search Servers decided to look for answers under the bed instead of on the site. It should be good in a few minutes.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
[ADDED] Message is wrong, the facts have evolved, all is well now; please move on. [/ADDED]
There is another victim of the multiple searchboxes approach.
you have one search facility that works very well, yet you confuse people by also offering lesser tools. I recommend you remove all but the search box in the CP title band. That would include the "search articles" on the home page, the tiny search box on all the forums, etc.
If you insist on leaving other search facilities, please make them just call the new, very good, great search page, possibly with options preset to something fitting the widget/button that was clicked on the calling page. But please stop executing a different, old, and less-than-good search engine as you do have a good one. More consistency, less code to maintain, happier users.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3 modified on Wednesday, June 1, 2011 8:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: There is another victim of the multiple searchboxes approach.
Nope. 
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, they have redirected the secundary search tools to the primary one now. Which is good.
If they now would remember some of the settings, mainly "sort by date created desc", that would be good.
ADDED
Makes me now wonder why Matthew asked "Could you describe the steps you took..."
/ADDED
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3 modified on Wednesday, June 1, 2011 1:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
You can use the Saved Queries to capture the current search and all its setting. You can save up to 10 searches. For example, I have a query to list all of Chris's forum message post, sorted by date created, descending. This lets me keep track of what he is promising everybody.
So, just do the query you want, enter a name for the query, and click the save button. This will add the query to you saved query list. Just click on it to re-execute.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
"Promised" is too strong a word. I prefer "brow beaten into offering".
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't you be coding right now? *whoopa!*
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I am firmly into a bottle of Jim Barry Lodge Hill Shiraz...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
