|
Keith Barrow wrote: It's not a bug, it's a feature 
It is indeed. Shouldn't lazy programming be supported by CP as well 
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a weak referenced editor.
|
|
|
|
|
Just edit the article with a new download and article content.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried searching for this topic but of course, it didn't work.
I searched for "sql statement generator" and got nothing. I put the same thing in Google and got the article I was looking for as the second result.
Thomas
|
|
|
|
|
works for me[^]
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
I tried this in the search box on the home page and got SQL Statement Generator by Chris Hambleton as the first result, the same as Google. Could you describe the steps you took, and what results you did get.
Matthew Dennis
Senior Developer
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
From the main page at www.codeproject.com in the Search Articles box I typed "sql statement generator". I clicked the Go! button and got no results. I tried it several times before I posted. I tried this just a couple of minutes ago and got nothing. I tried it one more time just now and it works. So I guess, never mind. Something wasn't working and now it is. Thanks for the replies.
|
|
|
|
|
One of our Search Servers decided to look for answers under the bed instead of on the site. It should be good in a few minutes.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
[ADDED] Message is wrong, the facts have evolved, all is well now; please move on. [/ADDED]
There is another victim of the multiple searchboxes approach.
you have one search facility that works very well, yet you confuse people by also offering lesser tools. I recommend you remove all but the search box in the CP title band. That would include the "search articles" on the home page, the tiny search box on all the forums, etc.
If you insist on leaving other search facilities, please make them just call the new, very good, great search page, possibly with options preset to something fitting the widget/button that was clicked on the calling page. But please stop executing a different, old, and less-than-good search engine as you do have a good one. More consistency, less code to maintain, happier users.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3 modified on Wednesday, June 1, 2011 8:13 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: There is another victim of the multiple searchboxes approach.
Nope. 
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, they have redirected the secundary search tools to the primary one now. Which is good.
If they now would remember some of the settings, mainly "sort by date created desc", that would be good.
ADDED
Makes me now wonder why Matthew asked "Could you describe the steps you took..."
/ADDED
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3 modified on Wednesday, June 1, 2011 1:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
You can use the Saved Queries to capture the current search and all its setting. You can save up to 10 searches. For example, I have a query to list all of Chris's forum message post, sorted by date created, descending. This lets me keep track of what he is promising everybody.
So, just do the query you want, enter a name for the query, and click the save button. This will add the query to you saved query list. Just click on it to re-execute.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
"Promised" is too strong a word. I prefer "brow beaten into offering".
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't you be coding right now? *whoopa!*
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I am firmly into a bottle of Jim Barry Lodge Hill Shiraz...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I look forward to reporting the bugs you are writing.
|
|
|
|
|
Features. Undocumented features, if you must.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I understand that, I did experiment with it a bit when it surfaced, but then there were some problems at that time (I'm pretty sure they got fixed), and it still requires extra clicks to get there. Having the saved queries horizontally, as a line of buttons above the textbox would be better IMO. But I would settle for a user selectable default query, which you would use in whatever way the search page gets called (unless URL parameters tell otherwise of course).
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
They all call the new search page, at least they are supposed to. If I've missed one, let me know.
Matthew
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I think you're right, AspDotNetDev already told me so. I actually stopped using all widgets/buttons/editboxes relating to search on various CP pages, I created my own browser favorites button that brings up the search page with order=createddesc as that is what I need 90% of the time. (I wish the search page would just remember that setting!).
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
I was unable to add multiple synonyms to the "Access" tag by using commas - as the instructions state that I can.
The instructions say: "Use commas to separate multiple synonyms"
However, when I did that it did not work and I received the following label message in red: "Please enter just one at a time." --> this works.
-- Thanks.
--
** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter.
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
How about code hosting within CodeProject instead of going out and using codeplex, github etc...
Its the man, not the machine - Chuck Yeager
If at first you don't succeed... get a better publicist
|
|
|
|
|
On CodeProject, we call code hosting "Articles".
|
|
|
|
|
you want more code dumps? 
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
