|
Bradml wrote: so damn stubborn about using ASP
We've been working non-stop on a full, ground up rewrite in ASP.NET for about 5 months now. There's no love of ASP here.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Even better, a language I know less about... Anyway I can certainly hepl by designing something for you...
Brad
Australian
- bryce on "Problems with Code Project"
*sigh* Maunder's been coding again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) People are clever enough to find such services all by them selves
b) The translations those engines give are in general good for a laugh only (on a side note, the translations can be hilarious sometimes  )
c) What about copyright implications?
d) What's the real benefit?
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Something I think would be invaluable would be to have a section in each article that shows what other articles refer to it.
A situation I have often come across is I have searched for an topic, been directed to a particular article and read the article. Sometimes the articles are dated and have been updated in subsequent related articles by the same or another author. Other times, a different author will use one article as a starting point and expand on a topic.
Usually when that happens the author refers to the previous article in their own article. It would be handy to have a listing of all articles that refer to the current one so you could see related content without having to search repeatedly.
Just an idea.
Love the site! And the newsletters!
Cheers,
Bob Porter
|
|
|
|
|
Ooh, I like that
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This would really enhance the user experience.
|
|
|
|
|
Bob Porter wrote: Something I think would be invaluable would be to have a section in each article that shows what other articles refer to it.
I think it would actually even be _valuable_! I'd value it priceless.
Visual Studio can't evaluate this, can you?
public object moo<br />
{<br />
__get { return moo; }<br />
__set { moo = value; }<br />
}
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, the English language, so precise!
in·val·u·a·ble
–adjective beyond calculable or appraisable value; of inestimable worth; priceless: an invaluable art collection; her invaluable assistance
No wonder it's listed as a class 5 language! But the feature would indeed be valuable, however we define it!
Cheers,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
OK. I post a message where I'm being ironic and somebody treats it as serious and gets seriously put out about it. Could we please expand the smileys to have an ironic smiley?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: OK. I post a message where I'm being ironic...
To the guy who hadn't any language courses as an SE?
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
What would it look like?
And would we have to explain irony to everyone? (I just keep think of that annoyingly incorrect song by Alinis Morriset)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Dontcha think?
"If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: And would we have to explain irony to everyone? (I just keep think of that annoyingly incorrect song by Alinis Morriset)
An icon of a wet wedding cake! Brilliantly ironic! 
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
|
|
|
|
|
just make an icon of alanis morisette. People will get it. I'm people.
She was actually on south park. I had totally forgotten.
http://www.spscriptorium.com/Season2/AlanisMorissette.jpg[^]
Visual Studio can't evaluate this, can you?
public object moo<br />
{<br />
__get { return moo; }<br />
__set { moo = value; }<br />
}
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: I post a message where I'm being ironic and somebody treats it as serious and gets seriously put out about it
How ironic...
Brad
Australian
- Me on "Public interest"
If you actually read this let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
I replied to a message and even have the quote from it and after a new message was posted the reply moved to it instead here[^].
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)
|
|
|
|
|
Should be good now
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When a user visits his own / others profile, we can see the messages posted
by that user. Is it possible to show number of replies each message has got in front of the message title. This will help to find messages with some replies, after all everybody must be interested in seeing how many replies his/her question has got. I think, this will be very helpfull, if in case it is possible. What do you think about this ?
"A good programmer is someone who looks both ways before crossing a one-way street." -- Doug Linder
coolestCoder
|
|
|
|
|
We'll see.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When I post a message, then use the back button, I get a warning that I will lose what I have done. At first I was very concerned; I was not sure if it was correct. In fact, it is not correct; the post at that point has been made. So I now know I can ignore the message, but I am always concerned when I get a message such as that.
Obviously most people don't use the back button as much as some of us do, since web developers create web sites as if the back button is not used. If possile, it would really help for the web site to be able to detect that a message has been posted and when we navigate past the text that has been posted, then no message is produced warning us of something that is not true.
|
|
|
|
|
Sam Hobbs wrote: , it would really help for the web site to be able to detect that a message has been posted
That's how it's meant to work now. Lemme check... [Checked. It works fine for me. Hit Submit, hit back button, no warning]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, thanks for checking. I got the warning twice each on separate days and such.
Update: it happened again this time too. I use IE 7. Note that I get the warning after using the back button twice; once to get back to the message entry page and again to navigate back from it.
At least you are aware of it. There is no need to fix it soon but at least you will know to look for it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
