|
Bob Porter wrote: Something I think would be invaluable would be to have a section in each article that shows what other articles refer to it.
I think it would actually even be _valuable_! I'd value it priceless.
Visual Studio can't evaluate this, can you?
public object moo<br />
{<br />
__get { return moo; }<br />
__set { moo = value; }<br />
}
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, the English language, so precise!
in·val·u·a·ble
–adjective beyond calculable or appraisable value; of inestimable worth; priceless: an invaluable art collection; her invaluable assistance
No wonder it's listed as a class 5 language! But the feature would indeed be valuable, however we define it!
Cheers,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
OK. I post a message where I'm being ironic and somebody treats it as serious and gets seriously put out about it. Could we please expand the smileys to have an ironic smiley?
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O`Hanlon wrote: OK. I post a message where I'm being ironic...
To the guy who hadn't any language courses as an SE?
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
What would it look like?
And would we have to explain irony to everyone? (I just keep think of that annoyingly incorrect song by Alinis Morriset)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Dontcha think?
"If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: And would we have to explain irony to everyone? (I just keep think of that annoyingly incorrect song by Alinis Morriset)
An icon of a wet wedding cake! Brilliantly ironic! 
----
It appears that everybody is under the impression that I approve of the documentation. You probably also blame Ken Burns for supporting slavery.
--Raymond Chen on MSDN
|
|
|
|
|
just make an icon of alanis morisette. People will get it. I'm people.
She was actually on south park. I had totally forgotten.
http://www.spscriptorium.com/Season2/AlanisMorissette.jpg[^]
Visual Studio can't evaluate this, can you?
public object moo<br />
{<br />
__get { return moo; }<br />
__set { moo = value; }<br />
}
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: I post a message where I'm being ironic and somebody treats it as serious and gets seriously put out about it
How ironic...
Brad
Australian
- Me on "Public interest"
If you actually read this let me know.
|
|
|
|
|
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
|
|
|
|
|
I replied to a message and even have the quote from it and after a new message was posted the reply moved to it instead here[^].
CleaKO
"I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.'" - Tommy (Tommy Boy)
"Fill it up again! Fill it up again! Once it hits your lips, it's so good!" - Frank the Tank (Old School)
|
|
|
|
|
Should be good now
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When a user visits his own / others profile, we can see the messages posted
by that user. Is it possible to show number of replies each message has got in front of the message title. This will help to find messages with some replies, after all everybody must be interested in seeing how many replies his/her question has got. I think, this will be very helpfull, if in case it is possible. What do you think about this ?
"A good programmer is someone who looks both ways before crossing a one-way street." -- Doug Linder
coolestCoder
|
|
|
|
|
We'll see.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When I post a message, then use the back button, I get a warning that I will lose what I have done. At first I was very concerned; I was not sure if it was correct. In fact, it is not correct; the post at that point has been made. So I now know I can ignore the message, but I am always concerned when I get a message such as that.
Obviously most people don't use the back button as much as some of us do, since web developers create web sites as if the back button is not used. If possile, it would really help for the web site to be able to detect that a message has been posted and when we navigate past the text that has been posted, then no message is produced warning us of something that is not true.
|
|
|
|
|
Sam Hobbs wrote: , it would really help for the web site to be able to detect that a message has been posted
That's how it's meant to work now. Lemme check... [Checked. It works fine for me. Hit Submit, hit back button, no warning]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, thanks for checking. I got the warning twice each on separate days and such.
Update: it happened again this time too. I use IE 7. Note that I get the warning after using the back button twice; once to get back to the message entry page and again to navigate back from it.
At least you are aware of it. There is no need to fix it soon but at least you will know to look for it.
|
|
|
|
|
How about having a Number of Views that a particular query/reply had? This way, forums can have a feature like 'Most Active Queries'.
Related: Number of child threads that a query has.
But by the nature of forums DHTML, only one when you open a thread, it has to send a AJAX call to the server.
|
|
|
|
|
That's done in the articles, but really isn't possible in the forums, al least not without generating alot of traffic, because of the viewing format. In "Messages" view, you get to view up to 50 messages at a time and you get the full text of every one of those messages. It's just a simple matter of showing and hiding DIV or SPAN tags to show or hide the messages. Clicking on one doesn't generate a round trip to the server, so there's nothing going back telling the server which one you clicked on.
Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't posts be checked for a subject before being submitted? Because this post[^] (see above), has no subject and cannot be clicked.
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
MatrixCoder wrote: Because this post[^] (see above), has no subject
Why do you not consider "open designer of rdlc report at runtime" a subject?
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
The message I was referring to got deleted. There were two messages posted by "AlexB47".
Trinity: Neo... nobody has ever done this before.
Neo: That's why it's going to work.
|
|
|
|
|
MatrixCoder wrote: The message I was referring to got deleted. There were two messages posted by "AlexB47".
Understood.
"Approved Workmen Are Not Ashamed" - 2 Timothy 2:15
"Judge not by the eye but by the heart." - Native American Proverb
|
|
|
|
|
They are. You've spotted A Bug.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
