|
More than half the people who voted have no idea what XAML is. I thought I was the only one who didn't
Man that feels good (not to be alone)
" Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill ? "
|
|
|
|
|
Ummmm. Ignorance is not really something to rejoice. However, now you've heard of it you can find out more about it and be ever bathed in the glow of knowledge.
"You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want." --Zig Ziglar
Coming soon: The Second EuroCPian Event
|
|
|
|
|
Its just that it feels good to not be the only one in the dark. Anyway I have a long way to go since I've only been programming in windows for about a year now.
" Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill ? "
|
|
|
|
|
.. but we rolled our own version of an XML-based GUI. Our purpose was to get something that we could build a GUI with, but not be dependent on .NET, or even Windows (since we use wxWidgets, it would be possible to port our stuff to other platforms if necessary.)
The concept of an XML-generated GUI is a good one. But I'm not sure if we'll ever have a practical need for XAML.
"Fish and guests stink in three days." - Benjamin Franlkin
|
|
|
|
|
As Mike Dunn points out, there is very little point in using XAML until Longhorn ships and our customers actually have it.
However can I (again) recommend you have a look at Marc Clifton's MyXaml[^]. This is XAML but useable today with the .NET framework.
I've been experimenting with it since the original Code Project article[^]
It takes a while to get to grips with but soon becomes a great way of building form based applications. It is now my tool of choice for building my business solutions.
(This message has been brought to you by the MyXaml fan club)
Michael
CP Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Michael P Butler wrote:
(This message has been brought to you by the MyXaml fan club)
Thanks Michael!
Marc
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
MyXaml
MyXaml Blog
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant S wrote:
Off-topic perhaps, but does Marc's MyXAML attempt to be compatible with Microsoft Longhorn XAML?
No. You can read my blog regarding why I'm not. Besides, I'm really not interested in a limited solution that works just for Longhorn, nor am I interested in duplicating the Avalon namespaces.
Unless Microsoft decides to do something devious, then MyXaml will work just as well with Avalon when it's finally official. In fact, imHo, it will work better, because it is a consistent markup, while the curren Microsoft XAML implementation is not.
Marc
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
MyXaml
MyXaml Blog
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then another 3 before enough people are actually using it.
regards,
Paul Watson
Bluegrass
South Africa
Christopher Duncan quoted:
"...that would require my explaining Einstein's Fear of Relatives"
Crikey! ain't life grand?
Einstein says...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then 2 more so all security bugs become discovered, exploited and patched. (in this order).
Due to technical difficulties my previous signature, "I see dumb people" will be off until further notice. Too many people were thinking I was talking about them...
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Turini wrote:
Then 2 more so all security bugs become discovered, exploited and patched. (in this order).
And by then, it'll be obsolete!
Marc
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
MyXaml
MyXaml Blog
|
|
|
|
|
Ask me again 10 years after Longhorn ships, when people in countries other than the US can actually afford the hardware it requires.
"Fish and guests stink in three days." - Benjamin Franlkin
|
|
|
|
|
Navin wrote:
when people in countries other than the US can actually afford the hardware it requires.
Err, you don't think that people outside have good hardware?
Are you kidding or are you just another narrow-minded american.
In many cases Europe and Japan are more high-tech than USA
- Anders
Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"
ShotKeeper, my Photo Album / Organizer Application[^]My Photos[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I am *not* kidding, and the marketing guys here can prove it. Perhaps in Europe, things are better. But in Latin America and eas Asia, things are not. In fact we have to continue to support old OSes (e.g., Windows 98) mostly becuase of that.
"Fish and guests stink in three days." - Benjamin Franlkin
|
|
|
|
|
So true. How can I use XAML when it does not exist yet?
|
|
|
|
|
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
So true. How can I use XAML when it does not exist yet?
Well technically it does exist, the Longhorn releases do support it - but it's not implemented on any platform that real developers are using. That's why I like MyXaml, it's here now and does what I need it to today.
Michael
CP Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
...about how Marc[^] will vote.
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer: Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Would he vote CListCtrl ?
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
Because he's the author of MyXaml[^].
Regards
Thomas
Disclaimer: Because of heavy processing requirements, we are currently using some of your unused brain capacity for backup processing. Please ignore any hallucinations, voices or unusual dreams you may experience. Please avoid concentration-intensive tasks until further notice. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I knew that since the post in the Lounge about "Marc is a prolific SOB"...
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Freudenberg wrote:
...about how Marc[^] will vote.
I'm a little disappointed that the poll doesn't contain a "Yes, MyXaml / Xamlon/ XUL" option.
Michael
CP Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald Bauer did a very informal poll a while back. The results are here[^]
Marc
Microsoft MVP, Visual C#
MyXaml
MyXaml Blog
|
|
|
|