|
TY
I've emailed an article, called Mella, an extensible calculator.
|
|
|
|
|
My article is published but I am not able to see the sample project.
|
|
|
|
|
The code can be accessed with the "Browse Code" option: Downloads: What is new in C#7.1 & C#7.2[^].
But you might want to insert a link in the article text. This can be simply done using the article editor.
|
|
|
|
|
Look at the articles menu above, it has links to everything you need.
modified 29-Jan-18 3:55am.
|
|
|
|
|
Methinks Amy is a spammer.
|
|
|
|
|
Methinks I need more ![Java | [Coffee]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/coffee.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=255518&aid=1227073
on the other hand...
he says the product is free, but then it writes a link to a pricing list?
I don't think he is a spammer, so I didn't report this item in S&A forum, but I do think it is a bit contradictory
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
LinFu.DynamicModel, MxClone, and the Art of Adaptive Object Models[^]
no sun glasses needed 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I updated my article and marked it as updated. However it is not showing up on the articles page.
Bowling Calculator
Why?
|
|
|
|
|
Do you mean Latest Updates[^]? It shows up there for me.
Maybe caching was to blame.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
It finally showed up. Code projects website seems to be extremely slow for me. IDK if it is the new Windows update for malware or the site itself.
|
|
|
|
|
As I mentioned in the edit of my original reply: it could be caching, which gets refreshed frequently enough (but not that frequently to display the update immediately after performing it).
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Are page loads slow or was it the timing of the cache refreshes that are slow?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like both. I had to update my article 3 times before it showed. The site was not very responsive in other areas. For example when I went to look at comments. It is probably just my PC, it is pretty old.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Andy,
Just out of interest, over what time period, roughly, did you update the article those 3 times? The cache expiration is what it is, and so editing multiple times won't speed things up. However, if you had time to edit 3 times then either you're way more efficient than I am, or our cache expiration is way too long to be sensible.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It was probably the cache. I would edit and just check the updated box and then click publish. I am sure I was just being impatient. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
I have a draft version of an article and I don't want to preserve that draft. I want it so that the next time I click "Update Article", it gives me the most recent published version, not the draft. Yet clicking "Revert to last published version", while it does give me back the published version on the main page, doesn't seem to work when I opt to update again--then it gives me the draft version that I don't want. How do I discard the draft version so that the next update gives me the published version?!
PS. I also posted this question as a "regular" question and on the "Bugs and Suggestions" forum. I need an answer ASAP, as my ability to further edit the article in question depends on it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your article is currently locked by you for editing, afterwards I can take a peek. I strongly suspect though I'll have to re-upload the images, could you please email them to me? sean@codeproject.com
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
You copied this line:
"All the resources in your group should share the same lifecycle. You deploy, update, and delete them together. If one resource, such as a database server, needs to exist on a different deployment cycle it should be in another resource group"
From here:
Azure Resource Manager Overview | Microsoft Docs[^]
We have this line on the submission page:
Important Note: Have you used someone else's material in your own work? Have you properly referenced it and given credit to the original author? If you do not properly cite your sources, your account and articles may be forfeit permanently.
As such your article and account have been reported for plagiarism and will be removed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
