|
Do you mean Latest Updates[^]? It shows up there for me.
Maybe caching was to blame.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
It finally showed up. Code projects website seems to be extremely slow for me. IDK if it is the new Windows update for malware or the site itself.
|
|
|
|
|
As I mentioned in the edit of my original reply: it could be caching, which gets refreshed frequently enough (but not that frequently to display the update immediately after performing it).
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Are page loads slow or was it the timing of the cache refreshes that are slow?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like both. I had to update my article 3 times before it showed. The site was not very responsive in other areas. For example when I went to look at comments. It is probably just my PC, it is pretty old.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Andy,
Just out of interest, over what time period, roughly, did you update the article those 3 times? The cache expiration is what it is, and so editing multiple times won't speed things up. However, if you had time to edit 3 times then either you're way more efficient than I am, or our cache expiration is way too long to be sensible.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It was probably the cache. I would edit and just check the updated box and then click publish. I am sure I was just being impatient. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
|
I have a draft version of an article and I don't want to preserve that draft. I want it so that the next time I click "Update Article", it gives me the most recent published version, not the draft. Yet clicking "Revert to last published version", while it does give me back the published version on the main page, doesn't seem to work when I opt to update again--then it gives me the draft version that I don't want. How do I discard the draft version so that the next update gives me the published version?!
PS. I also posted this question as a "regular" question and on the "Bugs and Suggestions" forum. I need an answer ASAP, as my ability to further edit the article in question depends on it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your article is currently locked by you for editing, afterwards I can take a peek. I strongly suspect though I'll have to re-upload the images, could you please email them to me? sean@codeproject.com
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks very much. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
You copied this line:
"All the resources in your group should share the same lifecycle. You deploy, update, and delete them together. If one resource, such as a database server, needs to exist on a different deployment cycle it should be in another resource group"
From here:
Azure Resource Manager Overview | Microsoft Docs[^]
We have this line on the submission page:
Important Note: Have you used someone else's material in your own work? Have you properly referenced it and given credit to the original author? If you do not properly cite your sources, your account and articles may be forfeit permanently.
As such your article and account have been reported for plagiarism and will be removed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's definitely not a tip. It's an article.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
JustWatchLittle wrote: 
Quoting the Code Project Article FAQ[^]:
Quote: A Tips and Tricks post is a single problem, with a single solution, and a super-short write-up. Ideally you could consume it in under 30 seconds.
That doesn't seem to be the case for the article you linked.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
In this case I'm sorry to a lot of Posts which I marked "wrong section"! As mentioned above, I will not vote again.
But let allow me a Q: Do you really think the one is worth an article?
[Edit]
@chris-maunder Please undo my votes, seems I was on a wrong track, sorry.
modified 28-Dec-17 14:21pm.
|
|
|
|
|
For now I can't really answer that, because it's not clear to me where the classes are that he refers to. I've left a question on his article.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday i published an article. It went into the pending status. But today i can see it is got deleted. How to know why it was deleted ?
Prafulla Vedante
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have a link to the article?
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
This is the link [^]
Prafulla Vedante
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see anything about deletion; all it says is "This is an auto-saved draft copy of the new unpublished article created by the submission wizard.", which means that it's a draft and you should be able to edit it and submit it for review.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
