|
|
| .
"I'm neither for nor against, on the contrary." John Middle
|
|
|
|
|
___@sHubHa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| .
"I'm neither for nor against, on the contrary." John Middle
|
|
|
|
|
|
Look at the member's profile; does not look like a spammer.
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't mean anything about the member only he\she spammed this article
|
|
|
|
|
The message title suggests there is an alternative to what you have in your article, so it is not really spam.
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, a commercial alternative as opposed to our open source version which reflects the premise of the article. Anyway, obviously hijacking other people's articles is okay for the mods, let's move on.
|
|
|
|
|
How does using the words "alternative to article" justify posting links to commercial sites?
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
The link is actually relevant to the subject matter of the article. So I don't believe it falls into the usual definition of spam. You may have your own view of it.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you all for the great assistance. Someone from the mods went in and removed all links to our website from the article. We have fully working open source version on GitHub. This was relevant, real source code with real article.
The spam link however was left untouched.
Thank you again. I deleted all my articles. Hope this will finally resolve my predicament.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only comment is a link to his\her commercial website which looks like spam to me
|
|
|
|
|
I would suggest do remove the link and mark the Report as obsolete 
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can edit your post and remove or strike out.
|
|
|
|
|
I just wonder... why did it take you over 4 years to complain about it?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It never too late to right a wrong. 1023 years, 4 months and 22 days from now, when Alexa had taken over the world, spam will still be spam mate.
|
|
|
|
|
*cough*link[^]*cough*
Notwithstanding I have to agree on your spam report
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see no spam payload, and nothing that looks like a setup for spam.
All I can see is an attempt to answer the question, saying basically the same thing you said (except less eloquently), and replying to the wrong person.
Hardly a capital offence for a new user who probably doesn't count English as their first language. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
