|
Yeah, it's really off the scale.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
This is what I want...
- A human walks up to a place which requires previous approval to get in the building.
- The human claims to be Samuel SpecificGuy
- The human places his two hands on two pieces of glass
- Two scanners take a look at them
- Software compares these two scans with previous scans of his hands which are on file
- The software indicates the level of confidence that this really is Samuel SpecificGuy
This can't be a brand new idea. I mean, really; checking hand size to help guess if the guy is an impostor ? I've seen the same at least once, without a human; just software granting access to places with pretty important security restrictions.
I'm NOT talking about fingerprints !!! Just hand size.
I asked google and bing for something about hand scanners and I got a bunch of hits about bar code readers.
Could somebody provide me with a vocabulary lesson as to what I should ask, e.g., phrases that google or bing might understand ?
|
|
|
|
|
C-P-User-3 wrote: bing might understand
Now there's optimism! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Try palm scanner?
Probably get a lot of results about palmprint scanning though.
|
|
|
|
|
How about a combined face palm scanner?
|
|
|
|
|
After a short search I've found something that can help you, I guess you'll be able to get the source code somehow:
Palm study advanced software[^]
See button at left.
Good luck!
modified 19-Jul-17 9:11am.
|
|
|
|
|
I've designed and created something similar. Rather than putting the palm on glass panels I give authenticated users a device that is placed in the palm instead and the device grants the user the required access. I call it a "key".
|
|
|
|
|
With the first sentence you raised my hopes for the one scanner I always was waiting for. Imagine lowering your pants and sitting on the scanner until it has verified your identity, the whole time surrounded by security guards.
For some reason this always must be a lengthy and complicated procedure with bonus points for being embarrassing or involving being groped all over by strangers.
|
|
|
|
|
Facial recognition and gait analysis are sufficiently advanced that you should be able to verify Samuel Specificguy before he gets to the door using already installed security cameras.
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Edwards Jones wrote: gait analysis
"You are George Jefferson."
|
|
|
|
|
PIEBALDconsult wrote: You are George Jefferson
Classic!
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with DEJ facial existing recognition stuff alone should get you a reasonably high level of confidence for most requirements.
Bloody hell a local restaurant has the dammed thing set up so the waiter can greet you by name and knows you purchase history.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
C-P-User-3 wrote: I'm NOT talking about fingerprints !!! Just hand size.
Why in the world would you want that? You may as well ask them to guess a number between 1 and 4. It will be just as accurate determining if it is the right person or not.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think hand-size would be unique.
And how hard the person presses on the scanners would change readings too easily.
|
|
|
|
|
Google "hand size" scanner. Note the quotes. Several links down, you find this. Not related to security, and probably more than what you're looking for, but might give some guidance on other phrases to try, like "hand measurement."
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent ! Thank you Marc
|
|
|
|
|
What if Samuel had gotten stung by a bee on a finger one evening and the next morning that hand was swollen? That hand wouldn't match would it? Or some other injury to the hand causing it to swell.
|
|
|
|
|
Then machine guns and flame throwers would appear from inside the front wall and kill him...
You know... safety first.
|
|
|
|
|
Please place your hands in the yellow circles. Thank you for your cooperation.
|
|
|
|
|
THAT'S what I was trying to remember.
Multipass!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does this include a robot armed with a bottle of glass cleaner so that each time it is used it can be sanitized again?
Ohhh...you know what? You could identify the person based upon the unique bacteria on their hands.
System: "Scanning...ewwww... Yep, it's filthy Harold. Whyn't you wash your hands sometime Harold?"
|
|
|
|
|
OK, here's my situation. I have a dir that has a bunch of subdirs & files at various levels of nesting on a pair of drives. My goal is to have both be the union of the original set of stuff so that they have exact same contents.
Using the Properties dialog for the 2 drives, both as directly selecting the top node dir folder icon, and as going into the dir and searching for *.*, then selecting the all the files I get for the # of files & dirs:
C: via *.* -> 3826 in 616
H: via *.* -> 3826 in 616
C: via top folder -> 3824 in 616
H: via top folder -> 3819 in 613
If I open the top dir and select all the items (which are all dirs), the value is the same as if I had selected the top folder.
Going into the CMD window and doing dir *.* /w /s (or whatever) gives the same size as per the *.* selection, although for whatever reason, it shows 3X the # of dirs. 
So the good news it that everything seems to be copied (the total size is also the same) properly. However, I like to use the Properties dialog to do a quick check of the # of files, dir & size to make sure that a copy has been done properly. Here, the copy has been done properly, but it still does not show when accessing the Properties via the folder icon, and thus doing this check will involve a big PITA to get something that should be simple. 
I have no idea how to fix this!
modified 19-Jul-17 0:39am.
|
|
|
|
|
swampwiz wrote: I have no idea how to fix this!
Could this How to Make Windows 10 Accept File Paths Over 260 Characters[^] be anything to do with it?
Michael Martin
Australia
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible."
- Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
