|
I'm one of them.
Answer: No.
I'm retired. There's a nap for that...
- Harvey
|
|
|
|
|
I think we need to enlist this lot to encourage people to walk in the correct manner...
RUN-DMC - Walk This Way - YouTube[^]
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Is this why Chris travels between Oz & Canuckistan?
Does he walk between them? 
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Although there are many counterintuitive ideas in quantum theory, the idea that influences can travel backwards in time (from the future to the past) is generally not one of them. That 'splodey sound you hear is my head
|
|
|
|
|
This would seem to imply you can travel to the past.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
If I read it right, it doesn't. Instead, it is more along the lines of predestination: you get the Bell results because you chose the results you wanted and set the machine to match, which was somehow known in the past.
It Is The Absolute Verifiable Truth & Proven Fact
That Your Belly-Button Signature Ties
To Viviparous Mama.
|
|
|
|
|
Still, if true, it means information can travel to the past. If information, then it's likely a person can do so too.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: So ultimately everything boils down to the choice of whether to keep time symmetry or no-retrocausality, as Leifer and Pusey's argument shows that you can't have both. Since time symmetry appears to be a fundamental physical symmetry, they argue that it makes more sense to allow for retrocausality. Doing so would eliminate the need for action-at-a-distance in Bell tests, and it would still be possible to explain why using retrocausality to send information is forbidden.
"The case for embracing retrocausality seems stronger to me for the following reasons," Leifer said. "First, having retrocausality potentially allows us to resolve the issues raised by other no-go theorems, i.e., it enables us to have Bell correlations without action-at-a-distance. So, although we still have to explain why there is no signaling into the past, it seems that we can collapse several puzzles into just one. That would not be the case if we abandon time symmetry instead.
"Second, we know that the existence of an arrow of time already has to be accounted for by thermodynamic arguments, i.e., it is a feature of the special boundary conditions of the universe and not itself a law of physics. Since the ability to send signals only into the future and not into the past is part of the definition of the arrow of time, it seems likely to me that the inability to signal into the past in a retrocausal universe could also come about from special boundary conditions, and does not need to be a law of physics.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2017-07-physicists-retrocausal-quantum-theory-future.html#jCp
It Is The Absolute Verifiable Truth & Proven Fact
That Your Belly-Button Signature Ties
To Viviparous Mama.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting. But he doesn't say that it doesn't happen, just that it's possible to explain "retrocausality" without it happening.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: That 'splodey sound you hear is my head
Last week. I wondered what that was I heard. Now I know. 
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Two ears and a tail! Hurrah! Well done. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Instead, retrocausality means that, when an experimenter chooses the measurement setting with which to measure a particle, that decision can influence the properties of that particle (or another particle) in the past, even before the experimenter made their choice. In other words, a decision made in the present can influence something in the past.
Are election results particles? 
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
When I catch myself in the future smirking at myself in the present, that can be hard to get past.
«Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and it may be necessary from time to time to give a stupid or misinformed beholder a black eye.» Miss Piggy
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party tracking software is increasingly is controlled by only a handful of companies. Big Cookie is watching
|
|
|
|
|
We’re gradually learning that smart home devices can be quite valuable for police. And it also placed an order on a book about conflict resolution
And a pint of ice cream, with two spoons.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: We’re gradually learning that smart home devices can be quite valuable for police.
Wow - if that is what you learn from this then I envy you your non authoritarian upbringing and state.
I'm learning that smart devices are privacy-phages.
|
|
|
|
|
It was supposed to be a one-stop security fix. What happened? "Something Olde, Something New, Something Borrowed, Something Blue, A Sixpence in your Shoe"
And a security key, and a text, and a fingerprint on the authenticator app.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeap. Two-factor that includes sms is not as safe.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
I liked it better on the other thread.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
lol. yeah, was more funny there. and strangely fitting.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
The PAIR team will provide open source tools to improve AI accessibility. "Exterminate! Exterminate! EX-TER-MIN-ATE!"
|
|
|
|
|
Now more than ever we need well-documented code. Here are four ways to make sure your applications make sense to humans as well as to computers. Step #0: Write documentation
|
|
|
|
|
Solution: use 'goto'. Everyone knows it is self-documenting! Duh! 
It Is The Absolute Verifiable Truth & Proven Fact
That Your Belly-Button Signature Ties
To Viviparous Mama.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is taking another crack at getting enterprise and business customers to use more of its cloud services with new Microsoft 365 bundles. Just like the old Microsoft, with a convenient monthly fee
|
|
|
|
|
This week some of the internet's most popular websites will look quite different, as they participate in a day of action on Wednesday 12 July to oppose changes to US rules which govern net neutrality. A scorecard for those who haven't been paying attention
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
