|
No, he said "eggs", not "coconuts".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
If the number of recipients is greater than 1, then 301.
301 mod 2 = 1
301 mod 3 = 1
301 mod 4 = 1
301 mod 5 = 1
301 mod 6 = 1
301 mod 7 = 1
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: 301 mod 7 = 0 1 FTFY... Nothing like Copy-Paste
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Nothing Exactly like Copy-Paste FTFYC
|
|
|
|
|
Perfect except
Quote: 301 mod 7 = 1
|
|
|
|
|
Copy-paste strikes again...
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
The result is the smallest multiple of 7 which satisfies the rule : This result minus one is also a multiple of 2,3,4,5 and 6. So a=(2*3*5*k)+1=n*7, with n and k integers >= 1, and k a product of 2, 3, and/or 5 only.
In increasing possible values of k:
k=2 : a=61, which is prime.
k=2x2 : a=121 = 11x11.
k=5 : a=151 which is prime.
k=2x3 : a=181 which is prime.
k=2x5 : a=301 = 7x43, n=43, and we have a winner.
|
|
|
|
|
... in a new methodology: CommitStrip OTD[^]
Now we all know that's going to happen, don't we?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Now we all know that's going to happen, don't we? They're going to to screw it up!
And then the next one too... And when they finally get the hang of it there will be a new framework, library, methodology, language or other tool that they'll screw up.
All projects will be screwed up to infinity!
|
|
|
|
|
I have exactly this situation - a local running club want me to put together a race timing/admin system - really simple job that could be done in WPF over entity framework in a hot afternoon.
I'm thinking UWP over F# / event sourcing. It will probably never get completed
|
|
|
|
|
They'll screw up three projects with it, then move on to "the next big thing", and screw up three projects with it.
... Then move on to "the next big thing", and screw up three projects with that.
... Then move on to "the next big thing", and screw up three projects with that.
... Then move on to "the next big thing", and screw up three projects with that.
... Then move on to "the next big thing", and screw up three projects with that.
... Then move on to "the next big thing", and screw up three projects with that.
... Then move on to "the next big thing", and screw up three projects with that.
... Then move on to "the next big thing", and screw up three projects with that.
... Then move on to "the next big thing", and screw up three projects with that.
... Then move on to "the next big thing", and screw up three projects with that
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder why CREATIVE programming wasn't enough? Why they came up with all those variants at the first place?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
The only 'keeper' methodology seems to obfuscated programming.
Used, most commonly, in local programming sections.
Possibly because it's incorporated into so many applications across so many languages and a great span of time.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, today's Legacy code is like 2 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Cut around Germany, or not?" (10)
Good luck.
Andy B
|
|
|
|
|
Indecision
Incision (cut) around Germany (DE)
|
|
|
|
|
Well done, you have the poisoned chalice honour of coming up with tomorrows CCC!
Andy B
|
|
|
|
|
Nice clue!
Slogans aren't solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I suppose I technically qualify as one and I dunno. Sitting around staring at job boards that all want Senior .NET Developers probably wondering where all the employers looking for Junior or even Mid-level devs are. As someone currently looking that's been my experience anyways
modified 14-Feb-17 0:41am.
|
|
|
|
|
I am surprised at that. It shows that things are gummed up where you are. Your articles are a good indication of your ability and I can't imagine why you are out of work. I would not despair.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
I agreed sometime the job description is too ambitious for a junior position. And that turn them away. For my case, I might not looking at the right place.
Bryian Tan
|
|
|
|
|
I remember back in 2005 seeing an ad for an experienced dot net developer with 5, that's right, 5 years experience.
|
|
|
|