|
You might want to talk to your quack about alzheimers the next time you schedule an appointment since you wrote this a little more than an hour ago[^]:
Sander Rossel wrote: I have a theory that the same happened to Brendan Eich. When he removed the cat from the keyboard something that looked like a language appeared on the screen and thus JavaScript was born.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, THAT Brendan!
Actually, I've been doing a lot of JavaScript lately. It messes with my mental health, so I'm not fully accountable for what I say or do. Me and the voices in my head are trying to figure it all out, until we do please bare with us
|
|
|
|
|
Hey now, there's no need to blame cats for that!
The problem was (as it often is) a last minute change request from management . I imagine it went something like: "Hey Brendan, we decided we need to add a scripting language that looks Java before Netscape 2.0 ships in 10 days. That should be a simple change, right?".
|
|
|
|
|
Static fields are initialized in the textual order in the source code. So there are situations, particularly to do with partial or full circular references where you may access a field before it's initialized. These issues may be hard to repro in test conditions, and are more commonly observed in multi-threaded environments, or where serialization is involved (such as with remoting/WCF).
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but since variable e is an initialized ExpressionModel I'd say ConditionOperators should be initialized. Also because the code worked a few times already (without restarting)
If this happened in production I'd pretty much be at a loss
|
|
|
|
|
Worst case, you could brute-force a contrived unit test until the bug is repro'd
|
|
|
|
|
Worst case, I abandon programming altogether, can't find a new career, end up in the gutter and die of alcohol poisoning at the age of 34
Or maybe your case IS worse...
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, Mister TakesEverythingLiterally, why don't you go back to bug fixing instead of these nerdy joke attempts.
|
|
|
|
|
Nish Nishant wrote: why don't you go back to bug fixing Actually, this project is still in development phase, a.k.a. the phase were bugs are produced
After that we'll deliver to the production server so we (our users) can test the application.
And then we can do some bug fixing
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, the all-important phase-1 of any software project, developers writing hard-to-find bugs
|
|
|
|
|
Florence + The Machine - I Will Be[^]
Florence + The Machine did some tracks for the upcoming Final Fantasy XV
I'm a fan of both, so that's double good news
Three awesome tracks, but only one can be my sound of the week.
I really like the ambiance in this one, combined with the powerful voice of Florence.
Enjoy
|
|
|
|
|
I think that after you get enough rep points you should be able to obtain the Forum Nazi privilege level that allows you to instantly close any question in Q&A where the OP states they get an error but doesn't say what the error is, or says what the error is and dumps 300 lines of code but doesn't say what line the error occurs at.
|
|
|
|
|
Not necessary because closing a question requires only three reports which such questions usually get in short time.
Or did you not found the sarcasm icon?
|
|
|
|
|
Wait for three reports? Aint nobody got time fo' that
|
|
|
|
|
F-ES Sitecore wrote: Wait for three two reports? FTFY
You don't have to wait for your own report
|
|
|
|
|
You don't have to go back to the question . . . problem solved!
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
And what have you tried? :p
You always obtain more by being rather polite and armed than polite only.
|
|
|
|
|
Just blocking proforma answers from hi rep members until problem is clarified would suit me fine.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
May as well close down QA since that covers most of the questions in there.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
...was also a camera man [^]
|
|
|
|
|
true, but this is different ... the cameraman seems more like an Undertaker type
|
|
|
|
|
By the end of the decade, 25% of my mental capacity will be dedicated to remembering passwords and PINs.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't tell me: remembering pins[^] is half of my job.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't tell me: remembering pins[^] is half of my job.
|
|
|
|
|
You can say that again.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|