|
Answer 1: I program now because it's my career. I've been a professional programmer for 35 years, I'm pretty good at it, and it supports me and my family. I grew up watching the Gemini and Apollo launches. While I liked the idea of being an astronaut, the thing that really fascinated me was the idea that computers controlled the whole thing. I wanted to learn how to do that. I took a programming seminar in high school, plus my step-dad built a home-brew computer we learned how to program together. I majored in computer engineering in college, and figured out that I was much better at software than hardware. I've spent most of my career on data acquisition and process control applications.
Answer 2: I think one of the more fundamental problems in the culture arises from the communication gap between ourselves and the organizations that employ us. We don't understand them and their requirements. They don't understand the implications of some of their decisions, especially when they change their minds mid-stream. Like I said, I've been at this for 35 years. This poor communication is just as much of a problem now as it was when I started. In some respects the problem's gotten worse, due to unmet promises from heavily-promoted methodologies that are only partially or incorrectly applied.
When I started programming, we were finally leaving the era of programmers as high priests, inaugurated into the mainframe's mysteries, when users made offerings to receive the priest's blessing. We were entering a period when becoming a programmer was a practical choice for a lot more people than an isolated few. Now, anyone can and does learn how to program. Significant numbers of people are self-taught and earn some sort of income through programming. This has created an organizational mind-set that programming ability is a commodity. Fifty off-shore programmers at $10/hour are just as good as ten local programmers at $50/hour. The problem with this idea is that it does not take into account the fitness of those teams to their tasks. That team of fifty might work perfectly well for a line of business, data entry application, where best practices are well-known and easily followed. Software that requires extensive domain knowledge and background experience could be more appropriately handled by the local team. The methodology gurus have unfortunately convinced the powers-that-be that the fifty programmers are just as good as the ten, if only you apply XYZ process to managing the project.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Gary R. Wheeler wrote: Software that requires extensive domain knowledge and background experience could be more appropriately handled by the local team.
That makes more sense than any other argument I can think of.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Answer 1: I've been doing this almost as long as Gary -- my college class was among the first (at that college) to graduate with an actual Computer Science degree. The short answer to why? I'm a geek at heart, I like building things, and IT looked good. Also, I had no other idea what to do with my life. Looking back over my career? I made a good choice. Yeah, I've had some bad assignments, but overall, life has been good and I've got more years to go. I like what I do.
Answer 2: Problems are legion. As Gary pointed out, bad communication is rampant. Some of that is our fault, not taking the time to understand the business or to look at things from our customer/client/business partner's POV. As much is on the other side, with folks who don't understand what they want, provide poor requirements, and/or think that computers are a magic bullet or (alternately) that we IT folks are disciples of the Devil.
Pointy Haired Boss type managers make it worse. Too many don't understand what their employees do, lack people management skills, and lack business management skills. [In contrast my current supervisor is a pleasure to work with.]
The solution to the above is often patience. When everyone treats everyone else as someone to learn from and focuses on getting the job done right rather than right now, things go better.
Following on with what Gary said, I see outsourcing as the #2 problem. Note that I'm speaking from a USA perspective with respect to onshore and offshore.
Part of this is communication, due to cultural and language differences. Things often don't get translated properly and the onshore company gets products that do not fit the needs. This often causes unpaid OT for the onshore IT folks, fixing things while not affecting the manager's bottom line. Or it causes business delays as things have to be redone to get them right. Plus timezone differences -- having your development team 10.5 hours ahead of you can easily cause a day delay on any given topic. As a manager for offshore teams, I typically conduct 7AM EST standups to give my teams feedback at the end of their day to set them up for their next day. This works, but requires diligent effort and (yes!) effective communication.
Along with that are personnel problems. IT is big business and at least some of the offshore workers are NOT fit for the job, they get hired 'cuz they have a pulse to fulfill a contract. It's harder to vet as the onshore folks are not directly interviewing many of the offshore people. IT is treated as a commodity, which foolish. In addition to technical skill set, a good IT person brings personal ability, general experience, and exact domain knowledge to the table. Plus a willingness to learn. THAT is critical for everyone.
The same managers who do blindly offshore work also believe that 9 committed women can make 1 baby in 1 month ...
Not that outsourcing doesn't work, but the offshore center requires a manager who can communicate effectively with his/her counterparts in the USA and BA and P/A with the right experience and domain knowledge. Both sides require excellent communications skills and patience. It's just not that easy.
Problem #3? Prima donna IT people. Too many people focus on what they are doing and don't see the bigger picture. They don't truly see the business need, nor understand that our job is generally to fill someone else's business or personal needs.
Which loops back to Point #1 ... communication ...
|
|
|
|
|
Answer 1: Repaired computers on A6 aircraft while in the Navy (Viet Nam war). when I got out in '73, I got married and went back to College (B.S. Management). I needed a job and had "computers" in my resume. Got sucked-in from there. Took a 3 hour course in Basic programming, and started writing programs for my boss at the time. I was attending Law school at night by then.(graduated with JD in '80). Sold my first "commercial" program in '79. It was written in GW-Basic and a Radio Shack salesman (remember the TRS-80?) talked me into it. Went to work at a law firm for the next 2 years and 2 things happened simultaneously. I kept raising the price of the software but the RS salesman kept selling it. I also became increasingly disenchanted with the legal profession as a career. (Not enough BACON! ). The rest is, as they say history.
Answer 2: Currently, I am consulting, because the small developer is being squeezed out of the business. I still have a few clients (less than 10) across the southeastern U.S.
Problem 1 with the future caused this. The deliberate and wanton changing of operating systems and programming tools by Microsoft and others, to increase their bottom line and shareholder distributions by forcing customers to purchase new hardware and software. (Think Windows10 vs. XP, software as a service, the Cloud  . There is not enough time to redevelop packages written in one flavor of VS, before a new flavor of the month comes out. If the big corporations are struggling with this and pushing back (complaining) what do you think is happening to the small business like mine? Much less the small business that are my customers. The pace of change is not being driven by technical innovation, it is being driven by Greed.
Problem 2 Data security, hackers, crooks. If the big companies (Microsoft, et al.) put as much effort into making the o/s and development tools secure, as they do in marketing efforts (trying to keep up with the cool kids - think Apple), then they could put out products and let them stand on their own.
Problem 3 Vertical integration (the Apple model). When everything is proprietary, the talent pool and innovation that got the industry here today will dry up. thankfully I will be taking a dirt nap by then...
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Thelemann wrote: Question 1.) Why do you program, and what attracted you to programming in the first place?
I fell into it by accident. I found myself out of work at the start of an academic year and got on a general IT degree course. At the end of it I found myself in a low-level IT role. A mate worked somewhere that was looking for programmers. They assumed I could code because I had an IT degree.
Scott Thelemann wrote: Question 2.) Do you see any problems or future problems that could arise within the programmer subculture?
My long term goal in life is to buy a new TV later this year. I don't do gazing into the future.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
1) Because people will pay me to entertain myself all day, pay proper obeisance because they may need my my help and support in the future and hope for a boon of cooperation, and it was good hobby to turn into a paying business.
2) The truly greatest problems are (a) foolish management who think it's cheaper to outsource development overseas, and (b) the bacon-sucking subclass who are probably the impetus for (a).
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but around here you won't be taken seriously unless you ask for CODZ to go with your homework.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Question 1.) Why do you program, and what attracted you to programming in the first place?
I do not know. It tears my soul apart, destroys me, but I can't stop doing it. It's like falling in love, or more like eat very hot chilly food. In all three cases, when you seat on the toilet, you feel sorry about what you did.
Question 2.) Do you see any problems or future problems that could arise within the programmer subculture?
No problems, as long other people believe we are doing something important (and pay for it).
|
|
|
|
|
1. Why do I program, and what attracted me in the first place?
At school I was into languages, history and music, never knew what I wanted to become. After school, my mom made me study Law. I loved Law, but couldn't see myself as a lawyer, and didn't know there was such a thing as research, so I threw in the towel.
I got a job as an admin clerk at a medical aid, and had to work on a thin client running a DOS program. After 3 years I resigned to sell shoes, but lost that job. With my first job's pension money, I did a secretarial course, and heard some of the other students talk about programming. I was intrigued, and swapped one of my modules to do QBasic. Upshot: I only got a "Computer Literacy" certificate but I was hooked on programming. I could tell the computer what to do!! It was heady stuff.
I program because I love to solve problems. I love to break a problem down into its smallest components, and then frame it in a way a computer can execute logically. I love the feeling of accomplishment when my code runs without problems, the instant gratification of creating something that works. And I love creating beautiful interfaces.
2. Do I see any problems or future problems arise in the programmer subculture?
1. We think we're pretty special because we can do this thing. This arrogance makes us resistant to correcting.
2. Being managed by people who don't understand what we do and how we need to work to be productive at it, trying to squeeze more code of stones.
3. Rise of the Bro-grammer, linked to a view of "you're a woman, what do you know?" (Mind you, not just brogrammers, either).
4. Considering all code as throw-away, and therefore not deserving of careful thought, devaluing the craftsman coder. Surely this is what a POC is, but regarding all code like that is causing problems already for the poor coders who have to maintain the POC that went into production.
5. Process over people, which is what Agile and Scrum are becoming. People differ, we don't all work in the same way.
My 2c, I'll go chain myself to the kitchen zink again  
|
|
|
|
|
Ri_ wrote: 3. Rise of the Bro-grammer, linked to a view of "you're a woman, what do you know?"
Back in the age of dinosaurs, it seemed much closer to a 50/50 sex ratio, both in programming classes and the workforce. It's amazing that the arrival of the personal computer did so much to freeze women out- one of those bizarre unintended-consequences things.
|
|
|
|
|
Question 1.) Why do you program, and what attracted you to programming in the first place?
I started programming cause I liked to create things... Right brained, but with a degree in Engineering, Left brained, I also loved to solve problems. So programming made sense on both fronts I could solve problems using software solutions.
Question 2.) Do you see any problems or future problems that could arise within the programmer subculture?
Yes, we could become our own worst enemy. Once computers can program themselves, we will wish we never created them...
|
|
|
|
|
Question 1.) Why do you program, and what attracted you to programming in the first place?
Programming is very entertaining and it helps us to insulate our selves from the Muggels.
Question 2.) Do you see any problems or future problems that could arise within the programmer subculture?
More and more software development is being ruled by unskilled persons who can't understand why they have to scroll to read three thousand line document, and could I fix that and also make it 18 point type, it would make it easer to read.
Also diversity at the cost of skill; hiring people just to fill quotas. Most of us taught ourselves to code. Self teaching does not create barriers to anyone. I was the tutor for the programming classes I took while I was taking them. Programming requires talent and the will to be up at two AM figuring that how to code something no one else has been able to do.
|
|
|
|
|
for the same reason John Dillinger robbed banks.
and to meet women.
|
|
|
|
|
1(Why): To solve problems / puzzles. To make the computer DO something neat/new.
I remember my father on the phone dealing with an "OC7" - either "print the dump, I'm coming in" or some change that would make it run. I was prolly 12/13.
With ADD are two aspects: working on multiple things, hyper-focus.
2(Danger): H1B hiring to please the C-class and shareholders.
The nth level programming that is at a disconnect from real understanding of what data are / information mean.
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Thelemann wrote: Question 1.) Why do you program, and what attracted you to programming in the first place?
Question 2.) Do you see any problems or future problems that could arise within the programmer subculture?
- Wanted to create games and it led to elsewhere. It also satisfies my creative urges along with my need to make.
- AI taking over the task of programming. Why is it that in Star Trek they have robots and nanobots making life easier so that no one has to work if they don't want to and yet we don't actually see that happening in the early stages?
I'm not a programmer but I play one at the office
|
|
|
|
|
1. I bought a computer for my kids and started experimenting. It was so much fun that I just had to program. That was back in 1984 and I'm still at it (C#, Winforms). But I'm a much better designer than a coder. I code out of necessity.
2. Not sure what "programmer subculture" means but IMO many programmers do not have any real talent for their profession. They learned by rote (memorization) and their code and designs show it. They have to work much harder than I do because for me it's still a lot of fun.
BTW, it was very difficult for me to learn how to program. But when I got over the first hump it all came together. So I would encourage everyone in your class to at least get over the first hump and then see if they enjoy it. Not many things worse than having to do something you're not good at and don't enjoy everyday for 40 years.
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you program: I like to create stuff.
What attracted you to programming in the first place? Games… Games… Games…
Current/future problems: I feel we need to stop comparing ourselves to others and start defining our own culture. We are not engineers! We have different problems and do different things for different reasons.
- great coders make code look easy
- When humans are doing things computers could be doing instead, the computers get together late at night and laugh at us. - ¿Neal Ford?
|
|
|
|
|
According to Meyers-Briggs, I am an ISTP personality type. Programmers have likely strong analytical and problem solving personality types. It's all about the personality that keeps people involved in programming, because it's all about solving puzzles. You have to like solving puzzles.
There is definitely no real subculture about programmers/programming unless you are focusing on "hackers" and "hacking", otherwise, IMHO most people who have been coding professionally for over 10 years are pretty normal people. Some can appear to have some sort of personality disorder but it's likely they are shy and reserved and are just like everyone else -- only somewhat smarter than average.
The only future problem that I can think of is the "dumbing down" or attempt to simplify or automate the code creation process first through "boot camps" and then through software that automates the creation process for "dummies" so that anybody who can fog a mirror can select items from a UI and butta-bing-butta-boom! software is created.
Boot camps only have enough time to teach language syntax. Writing code involves much more than syntax and is more complicated than what can be taught in 4, 8, 12, or even 16 weeks. At least the software I maintain. We don't even have newbs or interns working with us.
I think you should focus your paper on the personality type and less on the notion of the subculture.
What other occupations do software engineers have in common with...
Electricians, electronics technicians, mechanics of all kinds, plumbers, millwrights, and even carpenters and steam fitters. Why? because they all involve troubleshooting and solving problems.
Capish?
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Thelemann wrote: Question 1.) Why do you program, and what attracted you to programming in the first place?
To be honest, the ability to CONTROL something to a very finite level was intriguing. I got hooked in 10th grade. It made no sense at first, and then the light went on. Then I learned about the first optimizations of code. Making things really really fast by doing them differently. WOW.
So, I had this world I could operate in, and be totally creative. Make something from nothing. Solve problems for teachers (Like using 30 terminals as printers with one command and printing 30 copies of a test at once).
Everything could be made faster, easier, and better. WITHOUT SPENDING A Dime.
(At the same time, I liked electronics, but an accident with a soldering item cost me $10 in parts I could barely afford, and decided hardware was HARD. LOL)
Scott Thelemann wrote: Question 2.) Do you see any problems or future problems that could arise within the programmer subculture?
So, the challenge with programming is that it is mostly a solitary thing. Yes, we work on groups, and have loud conversations. But it is mano a mano with the code and the compiler. Or interpreter or browser or jvm these days.
The challenge is that it is PRETTY HARD to be REALLY GOOD. And that we are better at it when we are younger. As I approach 50, I am lagging. It takes me days to solve things I could have solved in minutes or hours when I was a teen. I would say my CPU Cycles are easily 30% reduced. I am more efficient managing other coders.
And that begets the next challenge. If you can't do it forever, what is your career plan.
Finally, the software developers are ALWAYS the end getting squeezed. For some reasons, if a sales person can close 1 Million in sales/year. NOBODY would ask them to close 1 Million a month, for 24 months straight, and consider missing by 1 dollar an abject failure.
But we have probably all seen projects where management expectations are that developers will work at unheard of productivity for 2-3 years because that is the time they have to complete it, and that is all the budget they are going to get. Because we create something from our heads, people believe it is easy (especially if we make it look easy). Or because managers who can "envision it" in 2 hrs think that it shouldn't take much more than that to create it (LOL, ask the Wright Brothers).
That, and few females... Luckily I can afford all the caffeine, bacon and Hawaiian pizza I desire.
HTH,
Kirk Out!
|
|
|
|
|
Question 1.) Why do you program, and what attracted you to programming in the first place?
I think two things conspired together to push me toward programming. The first thing being that I read a lot of fantasy and Sci-Fi growing up. Probably a lot of the reason for that was the second thing - I grew up in a small town, that is perpetually behind on technology. The school had computers, but only for Oregon Trail, and Operation Frog. The only computer instruction was Keyboarding, where you learned how to touch type (I assume this class was a hold over from mechanical typewriters). So, computers existed, but students weren't really taught how to do anything truly computer specific, and teachers ended up asking a few of the brighter students for help when the computer behaved in unexpected ways. Mix that all together, and what I came to at the time is this: Code is arcane. Programs may as well be magic spells to the technically challenged, and that makes programmers our wizards and sorcerers. Honestly, given the opportunity to be Gandalf, who wouldn't at least give it some serious consideration?
Question 2.) Do you see any problems or future problems that could arise within the programmer subculture?
Specifically within the subculture? That's difficult to say. There's some tribalism that can be problematic at times. "I use this programming language, it's awesome, and by extension, that makes me awesome." "You use that language? On purpose? Oh, that language is terrible, and you should feel bad." However, I can also render that conversation for a lot of subjects, from game consoles, to car brands, to political parties.
|
|
|
|
|
Question 1.) Why do you program, and what attracted you to programming in the first place?
I grew up playing every Sierra game... King's Quest, Space Quest, Hero's Quest, etc, plus the old Gold Box SSI games (and so many more). I found a hex editor for DOS and figured out how to hex-edit my saves, and eventually item tables in certain games. This fascinated me and so I started trying to figure out what kind of stuff would be going on behind the scenes (long before the internet became available where I grew up). I knew I wanted to make games since my early teenage years. Went to college for Comp.Sci, finished my degree, and finally got into the industry. It's been an interesting ride ever since! It's a fascinating career since every project you work on is completely different. There's always something you've never seen before, including newer / better / more efficient approaches to tackling various tasks. You're always constantly learning and exploring.
Question 2.) Do you see any problems or future problems that could arise within the programmer subculture?
Computing power is so strong and advances exponentially, and the software needed to handle the new tech must be equally advanced. The more the field advances, the more involved the software needs to get, so it starts to cost a lot more to make. Eventually when our computers are at the equivalent of a human brain (look up the Singularity Event) and start inventing newer computers, there's no way to know what will happen next.
This guy tends to have an interesting take on what's coming down the pipe.
Robotic Nation, by Marshall Brain[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Why? I love the challenge. The challenge of fixing some obscure bug that nobody else can find or the fact of turning someone's requirements into a fully fledged system that people want to use.
What attracted me? Started out at university, I was helping my girlfriend with an assignment and found I could understand the concepts and write programs. Transferred to the Science degree the next year.
Problems? Well were do I start.
- How about the growth in the number of people who have read a book or two, written a MS Access macro and now believe they can produce a complete enterprise wide system and then wonder why they have problems. They then come to the professional to fix up their disaster.
- The perception, especially in the corporate world, that a small change is easy to make and cannot understand why is take 4 weeks to be implemented when the IT group have to follow the corporate change management processes which they didn't do for their adhoc MS Access system.
- The evolving languages and where recruiters and companies want some who has the essential skills of ASP.NET, MVC, C#, WPF, MVVM, HTML 5, JavaScript, Bootstrap, WEbAPI and SQL AND then wonders why they can't find someone.
- And then there is the ageism. How come the recruiters and businesses do not believe that someone over 50 could know or program in the latest languages and technologies. We've only been programming for 30+ years, learning and using multiple languages, flowing with and following changing technologies and methodologies. Yet we get overlooked and they hire a 20 year old whose only just learned to program in one specific language and who has no idea of how to analyse the problem at hand or to even suggest an alternative solution as they have no experience.
|
|
|
|
|
Programming isn't something you are attracted to, it's something that sucks you in. It's like addiction, you start out of curiosity and get your first fix. Then the second. Then you're done.
The main problem I see isn't in the "programming subculture" but in the fact the ones you asked are still considered questions worth asking.
A
|
|
|
|
|
1) I had a specific 'real' world problem to solve, so I wrote a D&D character generator in BASIC on the ZX Spectrum. Realized I really liked it an eventually went to college to learn to program professionally.
2) The disproportionate number of men to women within programming is not helping the outward appearance of programming culture. i.e. too 'geeky' or 'nerdy'. Secondly, the willingness to accept inexperienced , unqualified merit, over experienced and qualified professionalism.
|
|
|
|
|
Question 1.) Why do you program, and what attracted you to programming in the first place
I began programming in the late 70's because I way fascinated by the fact that I, an individual, could exhibit such power to control a sophisticated machine like a computer, and through a few instructions have it do my bidding. It was exhilarating and fun. I'm not an artist, but I still like be creative and to see what I can create. I like to solve problems, and see the faces of those grateful people who's problems I solved.
Question 2.) Do you see any problems or future problems that could arise within the programmer subculture?
The biggest problem is that to stay relevant you need to allays be learning the next platform or paradigm. This business moves faster than than any other industry. The language of the day will change by the time you get proficient at it. That trend will accelerate in the coming years. Software is also going to start writing itself in the very near future, which may not bode well for pure coders. My recommendation for new people to this industry: Learn general business skills, the kind that you can take to any organization to compliment you coding skills. Learn accounting/finance, writing, public speaking, business math and and analysis. Get your BS in computer science but get an MBA in business administration. More than pure coders, companies increasingly want people who can cross the room and talk to their users in a language they can understand. You need to be conversant with the latest software paradigm and talk business also. Bottom line is you need to have or develop a passion for this industry. If you don't have that passion your not going to have the energy to invest the extra effort to stay ahead of the pack. Find you passion. What do you do when your not being paid. Find a way to work that passion into a paying career and you shoot ahead of the pack.
Good Luck
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
