Click here to Skip to main content
15,909,896 members

Welcome to the Lounge

   

For discussing anything related to a software developer's life but is not for programming questions. Got a programming question?

The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.

 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
Nagy Vilmos26-Feb-16 0:46
professionalNagy Vilmos26-Feb-16 0:46 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
908236526-Feb-16 2:36
908236526-Feb-16 2:36 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
Sander Rossel26-Feb-16 1:06
professionalSander Rossel26-Feb-16 1:06 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
W Balboos, GHB26-Feb-16 2:27
W Balboos, GHB26-Feb-16 2:27 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
908236526-Feb-16 2:41
908236526-Feb-16 2:41 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
W Balboos, GHB26-Feb-16 2:49
W Balboos, GHB26-Feb-16 2:49 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
908236526-Feb-16 4:08
908236526-Feb-16 4:08 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
W Balboos, GHB26-Feb-16 4:22
W Balboos, GHB26-Feb-16 4:22 
Absolutely wrong.

The numbers between 10 and 20 are more commonly used than larger numbers and essentially every language has shortened version of them. None the less, they all exist.

For numbers between 20 and 30, 30 and 40, etc., they are constructed by creating the two-word number in a methodical manner: n-ty-one, n-ty-two, etc. After sixty-nine, all civilized languages then move on to seventy. For, as from six descends the concept of six thus does seven beget seventy, eight to eighty. Since we use the decimal system, when ninety-nine is reached, instead of something like tenty, we roll over to a convention for the next order of magnitude.*

Now, on the other hand, frog-speak seems to have found the concept beyond sixty-nine to be overwhelmingly complex and thus they needed to start over again with what was obviously at the limits of their comprehension. Even a very small child, having learned to count up to fifty-nine (in a real language) would not move on to sixty ten, but would produce something akin to seventy.

Perhaps your defense of the indefensible is out of a misplaced sympathy for the dying. Far better that you let it wend its way into oblivion discretely!


* Hobbits of The Shire, in fact, do have numbers such as eleventy, but we are neither in Middle Earth nor in the Third Age thereof.


"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
"As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert
"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
908236526-Feb-16 4:43
908236526-Feb-16 4:43 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
W Balboos, GHB26-Feb-16 5:01
W Balboos, GHB26-Feb-16 5:01 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
GenJerDan26-Feb-16 3:09
GenJerDan26-Feb-16 3:09 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
jeron126-Feb-16 3:52
jeron126-Feb-16 3:52 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
wizardzz26-Feb-16 3:55
wizardzz26-Feb-16 3:55 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
908236526-Feb-16 4:09
908236526-Feb-16 4:09 
GeneralRe: Mum! They've broken the language again! Pin
Andreas Mertens26-Feb-16 4:53
professionalAndreas Mertens26-Feb-16 4:53 
GeneralCCC OTD 2016-02-26 Pin
OriginalGriff25-Feb-16 22:00
mveOriginalGriff25-Feb-16 22:00 
GeneralRe: CCC OTD 2016-02-26 Pin
U. G. Leander25-Feb-16 22:03
professionalU. G. Leander25-Feb-16 22:03 
GeneralRe: CCC OTD 2016-02-26 Pin
OriginalGriff25-Feb-16 22:07
mveOriginalGriff25-Feb-16 22:07 
GeneralRe: CCC OTD 2016-02-26 Pin
U. G. Leander25-Feb-16 22:42
professionalU. G. Leander25-Feb-16 22:42 
GeneralRe: CCC OTD 2016-02-26 Pin
OriginalGriff25-Feb-16 22:49
mveOriginalGriff25-Feb-16 22:49 
GeneralRe: CCC OTD 2016-02-26 Pin
Duncan Edwards Jones25-Feb-16 22:14
professionalDuncan Edwards Jones25-Feb-16 22:14 
GeneralRe: CCC OTD 2016-02-26 Pin
OriginalGriff25-Feb-16 22:23
mveOriginalGriff25-Feb-16 22:23 
GeneralRe: CCC OTD 2016-02-26 Pin
Duncan Edwards Jones25-Feb-16 22:41
professionalDuncan Edwards Jones25-Feb-16 22:41 
GeneralRe: CCC OTD 2016-02-26 We have a winner! Pin
OriginalGriff25-Feb-16 22:42
mveOriginalGriff25-Feb-16 22:42 
GeneralRe: CCC OTD 2016-02-26 We have a winner! Pin
super26-Feb-16 0:45
professionalsuper26-Feb-16 0:45 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.