|
I use Search Lotto, for every 25 searches you make they give you a twentieth of a lottery ticket in the next draw.
Last week I had my first win, the 16 pence has already been paid into my bank account.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
chriselst wrote: Last week I had my first win, the 16 pence has already been paid into my bank account.
That cheered I up!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: That cheered I up!
This must be that traditional English. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
That it are. West Country (the original cowboys).
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beh. They're just search engines; all they do is create minimalistic reports on work that other people have done. I don't know when people started believing that that was more important than the work itself, but it's a mistaken belief.
They're easily replaceable, and would be quickly replaced (by organisations that pay their taxes, and therefore improve the welfare of our children).
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Not that easily: how many paper manuals did VS come with last time you bought it? And have you ever tried using the help from within it?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: have you ever tried using the help from within it?
Back in the day (before it was called "Visual Studio", even), the docs weren't too bad, but they must have hired a bunch of really incompetent technical writers to keep them going (going down the drain, that is).
What am I saying, "must have"? It's bleeding obvious that they hired incompetent technical writers, particularly at the senior levels.
Google doesn't make the content, though -- it doesn't do the work -- it just printfs a report on your screen, giving minimal details of pages that contain the work you need to see.
Any search engine can do that.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Any search engine can do that.
Yes, it can. But Google do it very well indeed.
So rather than kick them out of Europe, get the buggers to pay taxes properly, along with Amazon, Starbucks, ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: get the buggers to pay taxes properly, along with Amazon, Starbucks,...
...Dalek Dave
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, come on! The impossible we do fairly quickly, but that? 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Google do it very well indeed.
Whenever I try one of those "compare search engine" pages, I always end up selecting the response from Yahoo as the best one. Maybe it's time I actually started using it.
We're having to pay more income tax and give up public services because the greedy b*st*rds refuse to pay their way, so a little bit of protestation wouldn't hurt.
OriginalGriff wrote: rather than kick them out of Europe, get the buggers to pay taxes properly, along with Amazon, Starbucks, ...
That would be preferable, but it's the one thing that you can guarantee ain't gonna happen.
Once these types get their hands on *free* *money*, there's no way in the world they will let it go, even if it means giving up their children as sacrifices.
A more functional solution would be to kick their arses out, and wait for them to come crawling back, cap in hand.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
you could convert to Yahoo
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
I remember being sceptical that there was anything Google could do that Yahoo couldn't, how things have changed.
I believe that at some [not too distant] point in the future, someone will come up with a better/faster algorithm than Google and they will take the traction out of Google's seemingless relentless advance. Facebook will definitely get butt-[REDACTED] soon with their constant ripping up of the rule book.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd be impressed if they did - and I'd suspect that Google are still working on better ones.
Pay taxes or not pay taxes: they do a damn good search engine!
And Android is good, Books, Maps, Street View, Chrome, ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: I'd miss Google: have you tried Bing
I use them both and can't notice any difference.
|
|
|
|
|
One thing to say: If Google was a guy.[^]
Wait for the end...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Google makes billions out of Europe, and pays virtually no tax whatsoever.
Sounds great. What's wrong with that?
Is what they're doing illegal?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
In a bureaucrat's mindset is like that of the mafia: If someone is making money and they ain't getting a piece of it then something illegal is happening.
|
|
|
|
|
How very christian of you.
How many of your hymns have the word "money" in them?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: How very christian of you.
Wow are you stretching. What does that have to do with anything?
Mark_Wallace wrote: How many of your hymns have the word "money" in them?
I don't know? How many?
Are you high or something? Or just given up? I asked a couple of simple questions and you try to attack me with stuff you know nothing about and with stuff that is totally irrelevant?
Wow. How sad. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: What does that have to do with anything?
You are be saying that it's OK to steal from the poor and needy, so long as you can find legal loopholes to let you get away with it.
That's well christian, that is. Jesus would be proud of you.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: You are be saying that it's OK to steal from the poor and needy, so long as you can find legal loopholes to let you get away with it.
I did, where? Perhaps you should go back and read what I wrote. I asked you two questions. Asking questions is not making statements. Statements != questions.
I bolded a little bit of what you wrote so that hopefully you can see that what you wrote makes no sense.
And turn down the drama. I feel like I'm in the soapbox.
Mark_Wallace wrote: Jesus would be proud of you.
Thank you. I do try.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: lawful taxes
Hmmmm. I guess I wouldn't mind paying taxes if I knew gov't would spend it in lawful ways and responsible ways.
But that's off-topic, and yes, I agree the likes of Google, Apple, Microsoft, given that "we" the masses, pay taxes through our nose and other orifices, should act responsibly and pay their taxes rather than finding loopholes that only the corporate rich can take advantage of.
But personally, that's the only reason I agree, as I believe the entire system of taxation is incredibly corrupt in itself.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Our benevolent over-loads are tax lawyers who do this sort of thing for a living.
If they are getting caught off guard by Google it is because they're asleep at the switch.
Lawyers who do a lousy job protecting the interest of the people are attempting to make Google look like a criminal because Google is doing a better job of navigating the rules than the people who wrote them.
I say fine the lawyers.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
