|
Both are perfectly correct, but normally pronouns are omitted when understood because it can sound redundant.
So while "I sat on the couch and I was hungry" is fine, it often doesn't sound good to repeat pronouns that way, so most people will just say "I sat on the couch and was hungry."
Otherwise you end up with sentences like "I sat on the couch and I was hungry, so I ate some leftovers from when I had dinner last night." It sounds better to say "I sat on the couch and was hungry, so I ate some leftovers from dinner last night."
You have to be careful with ambiguity though, for instance:
"I sat on the couch, my dog joined me, and the hunger grew."
Are you hungry? Is the dog hungry? Are you both hungry? A pronoun would help there.
|
|
|
|
|
They are both grammatically correct. From a style standpoint, the sentence combines (seemingly) unrelated ideas. That is, it begs more questions than it answers. Did the couch make you hungry? The the act of sitting make you hungry? When editing I would suggest something like:
As I sat on the couch, I realized that I was hungry.
One of the neat things about English for non-native speakers is that sentences can be formed in at least three ways:
I took my brown dog for a walk.
My brown dog I took for a walk.
I took for a walk, my brown dog.
I took my brown dog for a walk?
Although some are more awkward, they are all correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both the comma and the "I" are optional. Google "ellipsis" for explanations.
[edit] Having looked at a few other replies, I ought to point out that, no matter how you decide to write it, the sentence comprises two clauses, and cannot be parsed as a single one.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
They are both correct. The first however gives a sense that the sitting on the couch helped you feel hungry. The second lists two separate things and ideally should be separated by a comma.
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.-John Q. Adams
You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering.-Wernher von Braun
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.-Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
A Very Merry Unbirthday![^]
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I say that boy's about as subtle as a hand grenade in a barrel of oatmeal.
|
|
|
|
|
Please. Have extra respect for oatmeal.
What other food can you eat.
Then, should you get nauseous and puke into your bowl,
The oatmeal still looks the same as when you ate it the first time,
And It's still warm and ready to eat again!
It's really special.
| "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
W∴ Balboos wrote: It's really special.
Put some pink food coloring in it and it also looks like brains. Thus, oatmeal is brain food.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Oatmeal then, can be viewed as an infinite loop food item. In theory, the same bowl of oatmeal can be eaten forever, with no ending.
|
|
|
|
|
this, in fact, can´t be viewed as a solution to human´s hunger crises...
|
|
|
|
|
Why is there no monument to oatmeal in our land
If it's good enough to eat then it's good enough to stand
On a plynth in London we should see
"Here's to porridge made in Scotland"
Signed Oatmeal OBE
Spike Milligan
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
He's gonna catch himself a chicken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, the 99 'Next's' suck so bad they undermine the message
|
|
|
|
|
Reminds me of the kind of stuff you hear at middle management sales conferences.
|
|
|
|
|
For our own collection I'd like to start with:-
"A dirty mind is an endless feast"
|
|
|
|
|
I like that, 
I can also voich for it too. 
|
|
|
|
|
"The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it" - Neil deGrasse Tyson
Not quite. How many scientific 'facts' are debunked by new research?
Science has been wrong in the past, is wrong in the present and will be wrong in the future.
But I do believe they're getting closer to 'the' truth.
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: Not quite. How many scientific 'facts' are debunked by new research?
I'm pretty sure that's not what he meant: to me it appears that he is alluding to proven science and not hypotheses.
|
|
|
|
|
Any scientist (I know many) will tell you the more they learn on a topic the more they begin to realize how little they actually know. Science is only proven up until any one underlying assumption gives way.
All a good scientist can hope for is to arrive at a repeatable process which yields consistent results. This is generally accepted as proof - until disproven.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
