|
I know of people who have a 1st or a 2:1 in Computer Science and can't program. It really makes you wonder at the range of topics covered in Computer Science degrees. I would have thought that programming was one of the fundamental topics but apparently it isn't.
|
|
|
|
|
This is interesting too, because in the 80s when I was in high school they always said, "data processing" (computer science) requires vast knowledge of math, so I knew I was out. Then, around 1988 I got my first computer, started learning QuickBasic, then QuickC and started writing programs. I didn't notice that I had not learned math so I kept on programming and learning. I was very good in logic for some reason, but at the time -- because my teachers had told me I was terrible in math -- I wasn't good at math.
Finally, after some years I decided to take some college math courses since they were apparently wrong about needing math for computer science, I figured maybe they were wrong about me being good in math too. I excelled in math. I love math. But, you see, the way they teach things is so non-vocational that all the teachers get stuck teaching so much theory that many people become disinterested.
Then, finally the truth becomes obvious. They teach math as theory because the teachers themselves don't understand math. So they stand around and spout things like, "advanced math is required for 'data processing'".
Meanwhile, real and interesting math is happening inside your cells. But, most high school math teachers are really English majors who've never tried any math or logic problems outside the books, so they just keep the myth going.
Sheesh.
Then, at the college level, it does seem that colleges are teaching some very important foundational concepts . However, concepts don't get it in the real world. Students need more vocational training -- hands-on porgramming -- at the beginning, and then later as they know enough to understand how the foundation concepts are important, they should learn those. Or, at least more balance between the two.
|
|
|
|
|
There's video[^] and everything of this totally non-event.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try this[^]
Following a story that the paper was going to do something some people complained so the paper published a further story to say they are not now going to do it.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
I just had an egg mayo samich for lunch with a couple of pickled onions and an almaspaprika [imagine hot and spicy, then add hot and spicy]. This was by choice.
Yes! I chose to eat this antisocial food and I choose to spit in the general direction of the stupid 'make it social before you make it work' mentality. Okay we get, people communicate. Great. But that doesn't make it more, or less, important then software that delivers support for the critical functions of an enterprise.
Right, I'm off to post this on Facebook.
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: egg mayo samich
The baby spelling is getting annoying now.
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: The baby spelling frequent name change is getting annoying now.
ftfy
|
|
|
|
|
Touché !
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
I was going to say Touche but Rage has beat me to it.
|
|
|
|
|
... and with added spelling!
|
|
|
|
|
No he spelt it the French way, I used the English version
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: The baby spelling is getting annoying now. Only because you're new.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
P0mpey3 wrote: The baby spelling is getting annoying now.
It's been annoying for a long time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, you only have to eat the hottest paprika on word with your next sandwich - it called Carolina Reaper and it has 2.2M SHU while Almapaprika only has 10,000!!!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
I never thought you were social
It's an OO world.
public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
{
public void DoWork()
{
throw new NotSupportedException();
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sampath Lokuge wrote: Become a Social Developer! I believe that the phrase Social Developer is a nice example of an oxymoron.
Microsoft ... the only place where VARIANT_TRUE != true
modified 7-May-14 8:29am.
|
|
|
|
|
Argonia wrote: phase Social Developer
Just a passing phase?
|
|
|
|
|
I will continue to say its a typing mistake until proven otherwise
Microsoft ... the only place where VARIANT_TRUE != true
|
|
|
|
|
How any developer can be social?
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Just watch above video.It's free.
|
|
|
|
|
So according to Scott we are all social?
But I'm offended he does not mention CP!!! And no place for comments to abuse him!!!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|