|
Congrats! Only a couple of weeks past schedule, not bad considering the steaming pile of VB you started with.
I'm proud of you man! 
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank You much appreciated. If I do happen to find the original author(s) they might have a Sams Teach Yourself VB book inserted into each hole. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: for anybody...
Thank you, no ones picked up the Ren & Stimpy reference though.....
|
|
|
|
|
boah, Ren & Stimpy...
also a looong time ago.
they were/are cool...
 
|
|
|
|
|
It is a terrible film, but...
The Loan Arranger stars Johnny Depp as Tonto, an Injun.
He paints his face and looks like this[^]
This is seen as acceptable, a White Man painting his face to play a Potawatomi.
(Rather than getting a Native American to play the role).
Had Depp wanted to make a film about, say, Robinson Crusoe and he played Friday, would he have Blacked Up like this[^]
Odd that racism has so many flavours where it is seen as acceptable to Red Up, but not Black Up.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Your question has been put on hold as Not A Question.
Also, this guy[^] is still around, and seen as acceptable by most Dutch people.
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave should have wrote: The Loan Ranger
I think you are just bored and trying to look into something that is not there...
Also, the film was light hearted no thinking entertainment and a lot better than some of the 'sh!t' they pass off as quality on the telly. It scored a 6.6/10 (on IMDB) so it can't be that bad.
And don't forget, it was Disney.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1210819/?ref_=nv_sr_2[^]
|
|
|
|
|
As brain-out entertainment goes, it went quite well. I've certainly watched worse films, read worse books, even been to worse parties!
Much better than the version they used to show during the Saturday Morning Matinée at the cinema when I was a kid!
Never underestimate the power of stupid things in large numbers
--- Serious Sam
|
|
|
|
|
Should Blue Peter include a smurf?
Never underestimate the power of stupid things in large numbers
--- Serious Sam
|
|
|
|
|
I could do that and I wouldn't need any fekin make-up.
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
Hot water bottle and gloves, that's what you need.
Either that or go outside and rub two boy scouts together!
Never underestimate the power of stupid things in large numbers
--- Serious Sam
|
|
|
|
|
I have gloves and coat on, no hotty wotty botty in the house. The heating is now sporadically coming on, but when it does it's p gushing out water like the 1st XV after a two hour trip back from a cup win with no toilet on the coach.
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
Is it ok to Dalek Up? A white, slightly overweight accountant assuming the identity of a murderous robot? Isn't that a discrimination of Daleks everywhere?
That said: I agree that they ought to have gotten a native indian to play the role (or at least somebody who LOOKS remotely like a native indian)
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Umm, I think you meant 'Native American' not Native Indian!
|
|
|
|
|
That can't be true - if they were indeed Americans, why would the other Americans try so desperately to get rid of them??? 
Ooops - probably not a politically correct question either... 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-----
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-----
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
It's like a lot history, the stuff that is popular is beating another guy into submission. World War I cause Oil, WWII cause WWI not being suitable settled, Korea cause WWII, Vietnam cause WWII's Japanese invasion & Gulf I & II cause oil. Native American Vs. Transplants, Transplants have media and seem to win! Most cowboys weren't white they were virtual (& actual) slave labour from the East & West Indies & China 
|
|
|
|
|
history and what actually happened are only remotely related, I have been reading up on WW1 and nearly everythingI thought I knew turned out to be fiction (basically only the death toll seems to be accurate every thing else is fabrication)
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
I know, I thought for years and was told the shooting stopped in 1918 only in Europe. A good thing to watch if you haven't is 'The History of Oil' by Rob Newman really makes you think 'Oil', it is a little left wing but it makes you think  Also I have read the complete reissue of Charley's War (Battle Comics!)
|
|
|
|
|
not sure of the oil link as coal was still the major source of fuel, most I have read put it down more to siblin rivalry.
that and the usual european power games
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Aahh yes, but a small matter of the Arms race cause by Sibling rivalry, Which led to HMS Dreadnough a oil powered behemoth of it's day (Iron hulled, no need for coaling). Our German cousins (literally in the Royal Family's case) wanted the same. Germany had no access to oil fields by land and had to get it as an import via the sea (where is this going?...) The Royal Navy owned the worlds oceans at the time so the Berlin to Bagdad railway was seen as the best, least sea option. The irony of it is the last bit of the Railway was built by the Royal Engineers (in 1941) madness
|
|
|
|
|
HMS Dreadnaught was coal fired, even the most mordern BB of WW1 were dual fuel Coal/Oil, further to that the main trust of the war was for land and britain as usual was not a main target but was dragged in defending a treaty country
most of germany's oil came from the eastern europe not the middle east
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh Darn, or Belgium to use a phrase. Mind you that did make a reasonable reason (slightly more than a bloke getting shot at a station). It's a case I suppose of putting two and two together and getting five... also not really trusting your history teachers.
|
|
|
|
|
as I said most you know is fabrication
a few more
history - British generals fought the war far behind the lines and were hated by the troops
fact - more british generals were killed than german, fench and american put together, Haig was gerneally very well liked by the troops and a lot of the late war generals were very highly regarded, the old school generals were all pretty mush gone by 1916 as they couldnt adapt to the new type of war
genersls forced attacks that had no hope of success, whilst these attack did occur they nearly all occured though pressure by political masters and against the advice of the generals
haig in particualr had no quarms about ording thousands to thier deaths,
fact haig was willing to try anything new to reduce casualties and was one of the most progressive leaders of any armed forces during the war
in 1914 the politicos in london refused the miltary permission to retreat to high ground forcing them to fight the war in the valley bottom with its associated mud and miltary horendous tactical positions
in 1916 the british industry was still making shratnal shells despite them being ineffective in trench warfare, but the govenment had place huge orders in 1914 and they had to be completed despite not being the right type of shell, this meant that early war british artillery was particually ineffective
(by 1918 britsih artillary was exceptionally effective)
history - the Generals still used the same discredited tactics
fact - the british tactics changed dematically thoughout the war , whilst the French (and the US ) were still using the same tactics in 1918 as they did in 1914 , the germans only changed in late 1918 when they moved to storm trooper tactics once they got the influx of trained trooped released by the end of the war in the east
another tipbit, the British front line in 1918 was twice the length it was in 1916 yet only had aboput half the number of troops to defend it (Lloyd George stopped conscription as he thought it would effect his reellection hopes)
for a good read on the subject that does not follow the propergander from the politicos of the 20s try Mud, Blood and Poppycock
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Mud-Blood-Poppycock-Britain-Military-ebook/dp/B00A7ZJRYI/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1389702212&sr=8-2&keywords=poppycock[^]
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start
Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
|
|
|
|
|
Another good book to read is "The Unknown Army: Mutinies in the British Army in World War I" Also I was of the view it was fought by generals who had lots of experience fighting colonial wars where the was mismatch between arms (the Maxim versus the Spear etc.) and so hiding in a hole while the opposition charges at you was a sane idea. However it goes wrong when both sides do the same thing...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
