|
Yes agree, most of the time i check my profile. But can we have some count for how many visit from other users not self?
Thanks
-Amit Gajjar (MinterProject)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I raised this suggestion because some of the user have added blog entry to post a message whoever visit their profile.
Thanks
-Amit Gajjar (MinterProject)
|
|
|
|
|
We would only need this if we were a collection of self-obsessed, vain individuals........actually good point, why don't we have this option already. I bet it's killing some people not knowing if anybody has looked at their profile Pic this week.
|
|
|
|
|
So are you saying we should also have a separate count for profile pic mouse-overs? 
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Is that the Internet equivalent of getting fingered. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
I refuse to answer on the grounds that I will get censored by the Hamsters!
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Many miscreants are voting down without any reason. For example see the thread below, it's an accepted solution but voted down by a miscreant.
[^]
I suggest
1. Voting should be re-evaluated.
2. Should display the voters and their vote(1-5).
Thanks,
Kuthuparakkal
|
|
|
|
|
This issue has been discussed ad nauseam and the consensus view is that it is something we live with. And, to be honest, does it really matter?
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Unable to resolve situation, condition exists. Square 1
|
|
|
|
|
Is this the new Cryptic Crossword Clue?
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
I read it as "nothings going to change, so we're back to square 1."
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I must say I've been struggling with the CCC recently - apart from today.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
If the moves are legal and black's king is in checkmate, then what is the point
of live with it or compromise, because black has already lost the game. If “true” as it occurs in “true for X” is just the ordinary, nonrelative truth predicate, then it is unclear what “for X” (or “as assessed by X”) adds. On the other hand, if the occurrence of “true” in “true for X” is like the “cat” in “cattle”—an orthographic, not a semantic, part—then the relativist needs to explain what “true-for-X" means and what it has to do with truth, as ordinarily conceived
|
|
|
|
|
Mate, I would stop smoking that special weed you found outside if I were you. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or copying and pasting from dodgy philosophical papers.[^]
It's all an attempt to get into the knickers of impressionable female literature students anyway. Philosophy that is, not posting on the code project. Actually, come to think of it, that's pretty much what the whole of human endeavour is, at least getting a bit, so posting in the code project too.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh crapola: now, I read, after upvoting this, Keith Barrow has "outed" your source: I thought we had an original weird-warbler here 
Upvoted for being a fine example of glossolalia ! You could be channeling either Cantor or Godel in their episodes of lunacy as they each struggled with the problem-space of the Aleph, the ordinality of infinities.
Are you reading Lacan or Derrida right now, and have you taken any herbs recently ?
Vannakum, Bill
<color>"When it comes to atoms, language can be used only as in poetry. The poet, too, is not nearly so concerned with describing facts as with creating images." Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
Condition exists, unable to resolve situation, square 1 therefore cease case else infinite recursion.
Makes as much sense as your reply.
|
|
|
|
|
I voted this message up because I love the word "miscreant" !
best, Bill
<color>"When it comes to atoms, language can be used only as in poetry. The poet, too, is not nearly so concerned with describing facts as with creating images." Niels Bohr
|
|
|
|
|
For Those who answer the questions, it would be nice if we have percentage of correct answers or 5+ for answers.
Say i have given 500 answers and out of that 100 are marked as answered then it should be 20% Correctness. Person should also be filtered from Correctness from "Who's who".
Thanks
-Amit Gajjar (MinterProject)
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that would be all good in an ideal world, where everybody who asks a question marks it as resolved when receiving a solution, or someone at least votes for it.
Now, many of those who ask don't care to mark it as resolved, and those who spend their time in Q&A answering questions don't have the time to check and upvote/downvote all of the other's members answers. You cannot count an answer as incorrect or correct if it hasn't been voted.
I am ok with and support your suggestion though, with the mention that only answers that have been up/downvoted should count to the final average.
Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater.
Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater.
Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.
|
|
|
|
|
Agree with your view. But We should encourage people those who ask Question to Mark solution as answered if it helps. OP should got some message when he post a question. it should say that don't forget to mark solution as answered. it will help others to identify answer.
Thanks
-Amit Gajjar (MinterProject)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
