|
0) When you hover over the stars graphic for the question, you see the popup that indicates what votes were made (distribution from 1 to 5), but you DON'T get that popup for the answers. Instead, you get a popup textbox that provides the current rating and the number of votes.
1) When the distribution popup is displayed, it's not aligned at all with the stars.
Personally, I don't care for the stars and prefer the old bar. Secondarily, it seems to me that the item rating could be displayed under the stars without the need to pop up that text.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: ersonally, I don't care for the stars and prefer the old bar. Secondarily, it seems to me that the item rating could be displayed under the stars without the need to pop up that text.
I absolutely agree with you here.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
|
|
|
|
|
The ratings on Q&A is still bollixed. The OP's post should have no rating whatsoever.
What's the purpose of rating the OP's question, Chris?
|
|
|
|
|
To alert members that a question is crap, but not actually in need of removal, or to raise awareness of questions that are truly clever, entertaining, or particularly well posed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Crap by whose definition? I have seen questions downvoted because someone didn't understand what was being asked, but was a perfectly valid question if you had the right knowledge about the subject. And what are you going to do with that rating? At least Luc has a reason for wanting downvotes on articles - so he can avoid those articles in the future. What are you going to do with that rating? Look it up some time in the future, to have a good laugh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
You have not broken any rules per se.
People are downvoting because they are not able to understand what you are trying to say (to be honest, neither am I).
Just do remember that programming questions are not generally taken well in the Lounge - you can try some other forums for that.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising your articles is considered bad form. If everyone who posts articles advertised them in the Lounge it would be overflowing with such messages. The formal rules of the Lounge are displayed at the top of the page. The unwritten rules you have to learn as you go along. If your message gets downvoted then that is an indication that you have done something which people think is not appropriate so you should avoid doing it in the future. Remember that all these forums are largely policed/monitored by CodeProject members so you may find inconsistencies in the way that some rules are enforced.
Happy posting.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
It's the nature of a mob I'm afraid. The problem is, rather than just ignoring the comments you tried to attack them for doing so - repeatedly posting the same thing. Most of the people in the lounge have been active participants for a very long time, so attacking them provokes a fairly primal response and their friends leap to their defence.
Next time, just ignore them. Don't descend to the same level.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Most of the people in the lounge have been active participants for a very long time, so attacking them provokes a fairly primal response and their friends leap to their defence.
I was thinking the same thing.
--
** You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a carpenter.
** Jack of all trades and master of none.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Next time, just ignore them. Don't descend to the same level.
Nonsense. We use the clueless to hone our skills.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: a fairly primal response
primal? as in: primitive, by primates? speak for yourself, Chinner.
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
The quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get. Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they improve readability. CP Vanity has been updated to V2.3
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you are a popular regular in the Lounge, people don't like it when you advertise your articles there. A more accepted approach is to add a link to your signature. Many people do it (including myself).
|
|
|
|
|
We aren't allocated enough space in our sigs for me to get 'em all in there. 
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Kinda funny that the one message I mention having links to articles in one's signature would end up without the signature getting posted. 
I'm guessing that was a bug, as I would not delete my signature on purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
You didn't hit Ctrl-A did you?
(BTW - that issue should now be fixed)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
 I suppose that is a possibility. And I'm glad to hear that's fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
If I write a message in Site Bugs / Suggestions (much like I'm doing now) and end the message with the confused emoticon (  ) and press CTRL+A (in preparation to select all and copy the message in the event the message has an error when posting), the entire message is erased. 
IE9. Doesn't happen all the time, but I was able to reproduce it when I started typing this message (and have modified this message a few times and now I can't reproduce it, though I could reproduce it in a new tab). Ah, there we go, I can reproduce it again:
|
|
|
|
|
FYI, when I edit the above message, set the focus to the message textbox, and press CTRL+A, the entire message disappears from the textbox.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I've fixed it - thanks!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It keeps happening. I just had an interesting message for everybody in the Lounge to enjoy and now they will never know what that message was because I am too frustrated to type it again. 
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't had a chance to upload the new code yet. Someone's been mumbling about "testing" or something. Whatever.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Pfft, testing is for monkeys, not Maunders, silly.
|
|
|
|
|
FYI, this just happened again in the JavaScript forum. Still testing?
|
|
|
|
|
Still trying to reproduce it. It's stubbornly refusing to not work properly.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
