Survey Results

FirstPrev Next

Re: Why VB6 instead of VB.NET? Chris Cubley1-Jun-01 20:06 Chris Cubley 1-Jun-01 20:06  The problem with VB.NET is that it promises to break much existing VB6 code. It is not a simple upgrade of VB to add more features and make general improvements, but rather a radical departure from previous versions of VB. While VB.NET is a vast improvement over VB6 in terms of capabilities and features, it does so at the expense of existing code. Personally, I have no problem learning new technology and adapting to change, but the change being made does not correlate with the existing design goals of VB. VB6 is a tool that is meant to accomplish certain common business programming projects quickly and easily, not a language designed to accomplish every programming task possible at the expense of ease of use. VB.NET attempts to make VB an easy-to-use RAD version of C++. While this is an admirable goal, C++ does a very good job of being the programming language that can do anything. It has been proven as such time and time again. VB's current popularity stems from the fact that it is easy to use and can be used to tackle many common tasks quickly and effectivly. By adding C++-style power to VB, MS adds C++-style complexity to VB. Rather than reinventing VB, why not simply upgrade it to do what it does now but better and let the projects that need the power and complexity of C++ be written in C++? If you can learn and understand the advanced features of VB.NET, you can learn and understand C++. Chris Cubley Re: Why VB6 instead of VB.NET? 2-Jun-01 1:56 2-Jun-01 1:56  Well said! To avoid flicker Vikas Rao28-May-01 23:39 Vikas Rao 28-May-01 23:39  I got a problem in my MFC Application. I have loaded a bitmap in my childwindow with scrollbars. But when I scroll the picture, the picture starts flickering really bad. Can Anyone help me out. Vikas Re: To avoid flicker Christian Graus29-May-01 0:25 Christian Graus 29-May-01 0:25  You knew to post this in the programming forum, why on earth post it here as well ? Christian #include "std_disclaimer.h" People who love sausage and respect the law should never watch either one being made. The things that come to those who wait are usually the things left by those who got there first. working vs. playing? Chris Losinger28-May-01 3:05 Chris Losinger 28-May-01 3:05  i might play with C#, if i have the chance, but i'm not going to be "working" with it. did anyone else make that distinction here? -c ------------------------------ Smaller Animals Software, Inc. http://www.smalleranimals.com Re: working vs. playing? F Braem28-May-01 4:31 F Braem 28-May-01 4:31  I'm working mostly in Java and playing with C++ Re: working vs. playing? Christian Graus28-May-01 12:25 Christian Graus 28-May-01 12:25  Which do you prefer ? Christian #include "std_disclaimer.h" People who love sausage and respect the law should never watch either one being made. The things that come to those who wait are usually the things left by those who got there first. Re: working vs. playing? Ravi Bhavnani28-May-01 20:04 Ravi Bhavnani 28-May-01 20:04  I'm with Franky. I've been working in Java for the past year+ and have been a VC++ developer since V1.0. I relish interfaces and Java's discovery mechanisms, introspection, and of course automatic gc'ing via reference counting. But imho, there's no easier tool to chrun out Windows (desktop) apps than MFC/VC++. Working in Java has got me started using Java-esque design patterns in my MFC apps. /ravi "There is always one more bug..." http://www.ravib.com ravib@ravib.com Re: working vs. playing? Franky Braem28-May-01 22:27 Franky Braem 28-May-01 22:27  I like C++ more then Java. It really depends on what kind of project I'm working on. I don't like programming a GUI in Java. I do like to program server-programs in Java (servlets, ...). Missing: C++ ? George27-May-01 23:58 George 27-May-01 23:58  Perhaps there should be a checkbox for "plain" C++ (not a Visual, but still C++) since we have a "C" checkbox... Re: Missing: C++ ? Chris Maunder28-May-01 2:53 Chris Maunder 28-May-01 2:53  I ran out of option boxes Which flavour of C++? cheers, Chris Maunder Re: Missing: C++ ? Christian Graus28-May-01 3:20 Christian Graus 28-May-01 3:20  X3J16. The 1996 standard that ( in theory ) all our compilers are supposed to fully support. ( I admit to not having yet read my copy, I tend to stick to Stroustrup 3rd. ed. ). I concur - I looked for it on the basis that while I'm guessing I'll be in the Windows world for some time to come, I work hard at learning things like STL on the basis that they are *standard*, and are skills I can keep and use if I find myself drifting away from the WinTel world, for whatever reason. Christian #include "std_disclaimer.h" People who love sausage and respect the law should never watch either one being made. The things that come to those who wait are usually the things left by those who got there first. Re: Missing: C++ ? Alvaro Mendez29-May-01 5:07 Alvaro Mendez 29-May-01 5:07  I agree, Visual C++ should not be considered a language. It's a development environment for developing Windows apps/components in C++ or C.

Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00     Last Update: 21-Jun-24 2:24 Refresh ᐊ Prev12

General    News    Suggestion    Question    Bug    Answer    Joke    Praise    Rant    Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.