|
You could also use something like "last modified 8hrs 21mins after originally posted"...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure you don't already have this in place, but while working on a new client web site it occurred to me that you could give CP affiliates a "CP ID", which the affiliate could use to identify the clicks coming from his site. The clicks could be redeemable by the affiliate in views (on CP) of ads for the affiliate's products.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting! Thanks Hans
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget to credit me with some "Bob bucks" for my idea. 
|
|
|
|
|
Version 9.24. The selection is cleared but nothing is ending up in the scripts paste buffer, resulting in a no text selected error.
Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop.
-- Matthew Faithfull
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to give a few more CPians the admin rights to move crap articles out of sight? I'm sure everyone who sees this article is totally embarrassed for it to be visible on CP: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/clipboard/2.aspx[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Following a link from my RSS reader, I was presented with:
"The article you want to view was deleted at 12 Jan 2008."
Could you either correct the grammar or ideally put the time in the message?
E.g. "The article you want to view was deleted on [the] 12 Jan 2008."
or "The article you want to view was deleted at 12:32GMT on the 12 Jan 2008."
Regards,
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bug added. Thanks for reporting
Sincerely,
Elina
Life is great!!!
Enjoy every moment of it! 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am offering a suggestion of introducing a feature named My Messages which would help in filtering and showing only my messages posted in a particular forum. This feature can also be all encompassing where a link named My Messages would display all posted messages made by a user in any forums.
|
|
|
|
|
The messages are already actually indented to show the Reply heirarchy. But when the number of threads increase, there might be a steep confusion that creeps in. Just thought how about a thin dot-dash line like a TreeView.
That would indicate the hierarchy quite clearly.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
I am interested why some platinum member voted a 1.
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
It's obvious after all these years that people don't (or can't) read the big message at the top of the lounge.
So, instead of everybody flaming people who ask programming questions, I think we need a way to "kindly" redirect people to the correct forum to ask their question. Maybe a little javascript activated drop down menu that says "Ask In...".
What do you all think?
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Echols wrote: can't) read the big message at the top of the lounge
Steve Echols wrote: little javascript activated drop down menu
When a big bold HTML can not achieve this, do you think a little JavaScript can bring the offenders to book. Anyway, let us have some fun-time till the jerks realise their folly and mend their ways.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage
Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak K wrote: When a big bold HTML can not achieve this, do you think a little JavaScript can bring the offenders to book.
Well, that was for us CPians, so we could redirect them to the right place. (Can't we all just get along  )
Vasudevan Deepak K wrote: Anyway, let us have some fun-time till the jerks realise their folly and mend their ways.
Yeah, it is pretty fun to beat up on noobs, until they snap and start killing people in malls.
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
Report as "Spam", "Abuse", or "Programming Question"
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
That might be an option.
I was thinking it could automatically move the whole thread to the appropriate forum, but now that I think it through, it would probably be abused, just like everything else.
Oh, well, it was just a thought.
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
If CP developed a robot or Java script to detect programming questions, many post in the Lounge might be treated as programming questions because of hex numbers, specific keyword or terms, etc.
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
Na, I meant the CPians who knew what forum the question should be asked in could hit a button, and it would move the thread over.
Thanks for responding though.
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Echols wrote: the CPians who knew what forum the question should be asked in could hit a button, and it would move the thread over.
It had better be moved by admins, otherwise there might be problems / argues.
Maxwell Chen
|
|
|
|
|
Hehe, that ought to be funny enough when it starts to move posts high and low based on some "code" in the posters signature...
|
|
|
|
|
Quite often the pq's are accompanied by "please email solution to abc@def.com". Why don't we just take the email address and submit it to a large number of known spammers?
|
|
|
|
|
Add a "Ask your URGENTZ Question here!!", and a check box that says "Do you want codez with your answer?", then promptly redirect them to rentacoder. 
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Echols wrote: flaming people who ask programming questions
But it's fun when we are grumpy
"I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon
|
|
|
|
|
I just about clicked 'Abuse' on a message I had no intention of doing. I was dragging the mouse and sometimes my finger gets heavy (1600 pixels is a total drag).
It occurred to me that we should have grayed out (unvote, unspame, unabuse) links for messages that activate once we do any of the above. I'd have hated to vote this particular message spam it would have made me well ... okay so it's not that big of a deal ... okay so maybe it's not even worth bringing up ... okay I'll umm ... yeah I'm leaving ... right now ... so long, BYE!!!
Really though it may not be a bad idea...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
