|
|
I am, but that doesn't make vi any worse editor now, does it? 
--
Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, I've never read the texts of The Church of Emacs before. 
--
Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm surprised it's not in the list.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
As am I. I've been using it for about six years now...legally!
|
|
|
|
|
Me too - I've been using it for...I guess 10 years? I know I got it on 3.5" floppy, as downloads weren't really de rigeur at that point. The company I work for has got a site license as well, so I can use it at work legally.
|
|
|
|
|
Same here. I've been happy with it for years.
"For fifty bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow." - George Costanza CP article: SmartPager - a Flickr-style pager control with go-to-page popup layer.
|
|
|
|
|
I was also quite surprised it was not on the list. I mistakenly typed in TextEdit (from Mac programming world) instead of TextPad...
But, I decided to try some that were on the list I had not used, like Notepad++ and I found out I liked it a bit more. I have been a devout user of Textpad for many, many years (not Wildedit), but I found the out-of-the box capabilities, plugins, native language support in Notepadd++ nice.
I have used UltraEdit, many devs in my office swear by it, and I found that emacs for Windows/Unix (quite painful to learn), for the capabilities.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
jadaar wrote: I have used UltraEdit
I used it briefly several years ago. I'd say UltraEdit and TextPad are comparable - or they were at the time.
jadaar wrote: I found that emacs for Windows/Unix (quite painful to learn)
Tried Emacs briefly when I had to do two months of Unix dev several years ago. I couldn't get on with it. I asked the hardcore Unix guys in the team if I should learn vi and surprisingly they said no! In the end I just ended up using the Unix CDE equivalent of Notepad - can't remember what it was called. Not at all satisfactory. It all just added to my hatred of Unix.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin McFarlane wrote: In the end I just ended up using the Unix CDE equivalent of Notepad - can't remember what it was called. Not at all satisfactory. It all just added to my hatred of Unix.
Seriously, there is a pretty good "Windows-like" editor for *nix - NEdit[^].
|
|
|
|
|
I know what you mean. The text editors buit into the Unix CDEs are very nice, not as full featured but they get the job done.
Why the emacs developers were so intent on making the use cryptic I will never understand.
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I agree ... I have been using it for about 6-7 years ... simply great!
|
|
|
|
|
Textpad is the one.
But only Version 4. in Version 5 they screwed up the search in files dialog. i liked it to be BIG and docked in the main area.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't notice any difference in the search in files dialog. Or do you mean the search results? I've just tried it for the first time. It doesn't seem to dock at all. This looks like a bug.
Oh, yeah it does dock, after a bit of fiddling around. However, it doesn't appear as a a main tab and that is a usability regression IMO. Yes, I know it now behaves like Visual Studio's. But TextPad 4's search in files behaviour was superior to the way VS works.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
It's in 5th place, before Notepad2 
I am also a Textpad fan, though I must admit that I've tried less than half of the editors in the poll.
|
|
|
|
|
Me too. 
|
|
|
|
|
Progression says it all, but I'll explain. I used PFE for text editing everything from like 95 till 03. It was a really good program, but suffers from not having any advancements in a long time. I just used notepad when I got my new machine for a while and then got too frustrated to do anything scream as half of the files I edit were originally created in unix. To combat this I recently moved (last year) to notepad++. I had trouble getting used to the interface, but now that I am it is pretty usable. A few weeks ago I wanted a free format fortran editor as NP++ didn't natively support it and I couldn't make the workarounds that people suggest work. I downloaded eclipse and the photran plugin and started using that. Since then I've been using it for everything and really like it. It has all the benefits that I like about an IDE and the flexibility of a plain-jane text editor.
|
|
|
|
|
It is simple and fast no extras no problem if i need more option then i use ms word
|
|
|
|
|
Word is great for writing documentation, essays, and the like, but for large text-based script files and such, never would I use it
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's an interesting thing. Who really uses a text editor? I use VS2005 for writing code, Word for writing documentation, FrontPage for writing articles (yes, I'm archaic), and whatever you want to call that online GMail editor for writing emails. OK, I occasionally write notes to myself using Notepad, but I'm trying to break the habit, and use Google's note applets, which is really useful because notes tend to be something I want to have access to on any computer, anywhere.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I'm with you. I sometimes copy text from an HTML page into Notepad for pasting into another document without the formatting, but other than that it's VS2005 IDE and Word.
|
|
|
|
|
I tend to keep away from google anything, these days. They seem to be interested in gathering my life into their database.
It bothers me to even send mail to gmail.
For whatever reason, even before they set their sights on DoubleClick, I've lost faith in google.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Balboos wrote: I've lost faith in google.
Well, I was never under the delusion that google was anything but interested in gathering my life into their database.
I practice the simplest security policy possible: open information. OK, sure, I won't give you my SSN, credit card #'s or server passwords, so there is a limit, but otherwise, I try to keep things simple. Otherwise it gets very confusing and complicated.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah the first time I ever typed a search into an internet box, I thought "somebody is collecting this information and if they're not, they're stupid to ignore it" - knowing what people actually want is a super power. And yeah, nothing you might think is private is actually private. SSNs can be gotten a bunch of ways, just think of how many organizations have your SSN - it is a meaningless number. Your bank account numbers, address, income information, criminal history, all that stuff is (essentially) public records.
The problem is that banks and other financial institutions accept this public information as proof of identity.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
