|
The whole name filtering is being reworked to remove the band-aid I've applied and make it a little more robust and sensible.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Sweet! I feel so naked without my dots..  
--
Simulcast on Crazy People's Fillings
|
|
|
|
|
Here's one I thought I'd float by:
Since there are ocassional personal vendettas going on that use the voting system, I thought it would be interesting to aggregrate people's voting history and at the end of their profile append "This use likes ..., this use dislikes..."
And no, I'm not going to implement it (at least publicly  ) but it'd certainly be interesting.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know why so many people are against anonymous voting. There’s nothing wrong with “vendetta” voting either, within reason. If I vote someone down because I hate his guts, or I’m board or whatever, there is nothing to stop other people voting it up. If enough people care my single one vote will be of little importance. In the same vein, if only one person has voted (or very few) regardless of how votes are collected the result isn’t statistically significant be it a five or a one. In general I try to reply if I’m going to vote someone down but sometimes I don’t if there are already replies expressing my sentiment or it’s just obvious and needs no explaining (Henize is a good example, although I done my fair share of replying too) or you just get lazy.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
A follow-on idea: what about tallying up the votes and displaying the top 5 most popular & least popular members based on votes (forums only not articles).
"For fifty bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow." - George Costanza ~ Web SQL Utility - asp.net app to query Access, SQL server, MySQL. Stores history, favourites.
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe each user's profile could show a list of the top 10 people who've given him the highest post votes (averaged)  [this list is only visible to him].
|
|
|
|
|
Wont it be nice to have a "Navigation" link on the Quick-Access-panel that's displayed on the lounge? For example :
[Panel Navigation^]So that we can keep browsing for all the message of the same type there.
|
|
|
|
|
I mistakenly posted at lounge 
Now i'm at right place
In CP if I take Lounge forum, it is showing some latest post from Subtle Bugs
Like follows.
(1)Understanding the Problem
(1)Scanner Initialization Drift
(5)Caution! No sign ahead!
(3)The latest neat thing
(1)Windows Installer BSOD
(1)Data reverting back to old data.
(5)1+1=3
The number of posts and replies in the left hand side is something looks bad for me because on left side we are used to number the items. If put it in the RHS that will be looking better.
What I meant is to display as follows. I think it’s something meaningful and beautiful than the current one. Hope Chris is there
• Understanding the Problem (1)
• Scanner Initialization Drift (1)
• Caution! No sign ahead! (5)
• The latest neat thing (3)
• Windows Installer BSOD (1)
• Data reverting back to old data. (1)
• 1+1=3 (5)
-Sarath.
"Great hopes make everything great possible" - Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Osmosian Order wrote: This would not only discourage the wandering, off-topic posts so common in the forums
Well, even if i didn't like threaded discussions, i'd still be against any change for that reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Osmosian Order wrote: Order or chaos, take your pick. And live with it.
I like a little bit of both in my life. A healthy balance of order and chaos are what life is all about.
|
|
|
|
|
The Osmosian Order wrote: Order or chaos, take your pick. And live with it.
Every day. Order in code, chaos in people.
|
|
|
|
|
Having things as they are is more natural; real conversations evolve and wander. Also sometimes you need to reply to a reply to correct it for example.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
The Osmosian Order wrote: discourage the wandering, off-topic posts so common in the forums,
Hey. That is one of the best bits of the CP community, how one post can spark off ideas in all different directions. That's how conversations work. The reason the CP community has been so succesfull is because of the conversational style of the forums.
|
|
|
|
|
How about YOU start by not diverting normal questions with talk of Plain English this and Osmosicult that.
Don't make me link you to specific occurances - you know darn well where YOU have taken a simple question totally OT with your responses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group discussions are hierachical, meandering, mutating things. They aren't relational objects. Even a formal business discussion will spliter into different branches.
The forums are designed to reflect the social aspect of a community and not try and represent a theoretical model based on schemas.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Osmosian Order wrote: re you seriously arguing that a history of the Osmosian Order's parent company, or a discussion of Frank Lloyd Wright's architectural principles BELONG under a heading where the word "font" is the only noun?
You have a point there. However, it is certainly possible and not altogether unheard of for users to either change the subject line on subthreads, or begin a new thread (with hyperlinks between it and the originating) when a discussion goes off-topic.
|
|
|
|
|
Real discussions splinter, fork and evolve. For example person “a” poses a specific question to which person “b” replies. Person “b” answers the question but makes a serious mistake in some area unrelated to the original question. The logical course of action if for person “c” to reply to person “b” and correct the mistake. This also provides context. While I agree that if a thread wanders too far from it’s origin for too long it’s less than ideal I feel your “solution” is worse then the problem. No offense intended, but I sometimes wonder if you’re determined to address every problem with a radical solution.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
You brought that response on yourself after the way you've behaved on this site. I have zero sympathy.
|
|
|
|
|
What's so bad about wandering off threads?
We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP
Linkify! || Fold With Us! || sighist
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
