|
hi
can you put some SOAP information on this great site
The current information is vary little and is same that comes with microsoft documentaion
can you provide something more then that
i do expect it from codeproject
i have asked some questions about SOAP and they are never been answerd
plz look in to this matter.
good luck
Keeping IT up.
Love is Photogenic,It requires a dark to develope
|
|
|
|
|
I've got used to the new set and rather like it. I've a suggestion to make - how about changing the admin message icon to red?
Wouldn't that stand out better?
Cheers,
Vikram.
http://www.geocities.com/vpunathambekar
Google talk: binarybandit After all is said and done, much is said and little is done.
|
|
|
|
|
hi chris,
what's going on with the deleted messages ?
is is voluntarily that they do not disapear from the forums anymore but just get empty with an easily recognizable title such "[Msg deleted]" ?
I really prefered the old behavior, but if there are any explainations on the choice, i'm all listenning...
thanks,
TOXCCT >>> GEII power
[toxcct][VisualCalc]
|
|
|
|
|
It was my suggestion looong loong back. When messages are deleted (in old case) the messages in the thread misaligned and they look wrong/bad. for example if the person deleted the root message of the thread.
-prakash
|
|
|
|
|
If Bookmarking Thread is provided then I feels good to all just like bookmarking articles.
But I like this Codeproject so much.
![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) Thanks 
|
|
|
|
|
Is the Preview mode on the message forums broken again? Several weeks ago I commented on it, and there was a "bug" that got fixed. Apparently, it is back.
Preview is my most favorite method of browsing through the forums, so I don't have to open every message just to see the "Right, I agree" comments.
Thanks,
Dave
"You can say that again." -- Dept. of Redundancy Dept.
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed. Sorry 'bout that.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Any chance we might get one soon? Seems to me it's an area that's sorely lacking here. You can ask in the language-specific forums, but many multimedia questions are a lot more general, and should not be confined to a language-specific forum.
The multimedia forum could cover video, audio, 3D, and maybe even 2D graphics.
|
|
|
|
|
when I write a new post, I will ad a subject, then TAB to the text area and start typing ...
but now, with the new icons, I cannot do that anymore, when I TAB, it goes to the first icon, so, no biggie, I TAB again, expecting to go to the text area, but alas, it goes to the second icon.
is it possible to either remove the top icons from the TAB order of the page, or put them in a group ( like it's done in "normal" windows applications ? )
Thanks.
Maximilien Lincourt
Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad
|
|
|
|
|
|
What about a link that says... post since last visit.
I dont have admin previlage in my PC @ office - so cant install any software for this 
"He that is good with a hammer tends to think everything is a nail."
- Abraham Maslow
|
|
|
|
|
2. The internet traffic is monitored. So, having an application that contacts the server every 'n' minutes will be a problem in long run.
"He that is good with a hammer tends to think everything is a nail."
- Abraham Maslow
|
|
|
|
|
When you follow your own tip on your search page, it gives an invalid syntax.
For example, using your sample... "Grid Control" NOT MFC
yields:
No results found (Syntax error occurred near 'Control""'. Expected ''''' in search condition '""Grid Control"" AND NOT "MFC"'.)
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of (or in addition to) the long URLs that are used now for locating articles, it would be nice if a shorter form were available.
For example: http://www.codeproject.com/soap/WlogCVersion.asp could be turned into
http://www.codeproject.com/Article.asp?ID=12345
This example may not be a huge difference in length, but it would certainly be easier to find again in the future.
I know several people who print out the articles to work with them, but the URL gets truncated and is therfore useless for finding the article again when looking for updates or to download the examples.
OK I'll admit it.... I've printed articles, to "review" them on the can, and had to hunt for them all over again because the URL was truncated.
Microsoft places article ids on their knowledge base articles and once you know the format, that's all you need to find the article again.
Thanks for reading
Brad Bruce
-- modifed at 8:28 Thursday 25th August, 2005
 One of my coworkers just pointed out that the URL is printed at the top of the article (not just what the browser prints)
I still think it would be easier to type in an article ID (maybe from the home page). Maybe if one were in the area where the date posted, date updated, # views, rating etc were located.
Brad
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to add the Per Page settings to our My Settings section rather than in the forums? You can't set it without signing in anyway. The reason I'm asking is that if I have to reboot or it's Monday (highly convenient) all my cookies get wiped. Perhaps some of the other forum settings could also be set to defaults for the user.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if anyone else has the same problem, but I often experience difficulties with CP session while browsing around the site, sometimes it just expires for no obvious reason, like the session timeout has been set to 10 seconds or something.. Really annoying.. I't okay once you check the 'remember me' checkbox, but I obviously can't do that everywhere I go.. 
Is this a known issue or..?
---
YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BLONDIE!?!? YOU'RE JUST A SON OF A BA A A A AAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
http://sprdsoft.cmar-net.org
|
|
|
|
|
I think a wiki on specific topics would be a cool idea.
There are many articles on CodeProject, but many of they are very similar.
It doesn't make sense for example to create ten articles about working threads and so on.
So I think that there should be a wiki with a small team of admins that create big topics, e.g. threads, stream sockets, dgram sockets, streaming, audio, 3d, specific mathematic topics, and so on, and every user can add/change things.
So it could be possible that every user of CodeProject could improve articles to make everything better! So we could write good article texts instead of buggy source code, which can be very time consuming for a single person. That would make life easier!
What do you think?
Don't try it, just do it! 
|
|
|
|
|
I would *love* a WinAPI WIKI. Somewhere to collect comments, tips, errata on the various Windows APIs... Not sure if it'd fly, but would be fun to try. Especially with VS integration...
|
|
|
|
|
That would be awsome!  If I had the resources I'd start the thing today but..I don't..  Anyone rich here?
---
YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BLONDIE!?!? YOU'RE JUST A SON OF A BA A A A AAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
http://sprdsoft.cmar-net.org
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander M. wrote:
I think a wiki on specific topics would be a cool idea.
There are many articles on CodeProject, but many of they are very similar.
It doesn't make sense for example to create ten articles about working threads and so on.
So I think that there should be a wiki with a small team of admins that create big topics, e.g. threads, stream sockets, dgram sockets, streaming, audio, 3d, specific mathematic topics, and so on, and every user can add/change things.
So it could be possible that every user of CodeProject could improve articles to make everything better! So we could write good article texts instead of buggy source code, which can be very time consuming for a single person. That would make life easier!
What do you think?
I think the diversity of articles on the same subject is one of CodeProject's strengths. I prefer to read articles that have a single author's voice, rather than a tech document built by a committee.
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
Michael P Butler wrote:
built by a committee
I see that you did not even understand the concept of wikis!
Don't try it, just do it!
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander M. wrote:
I see that you did not even understand the concept of wikis!
I well aware of how wikis work. The trouble with them is that the contents receives so many edits that it is no longer the work of an individual. I prefer to read a personal view on the subject and not get into pissing contests on whose view is more correct.
Wikis have their place. I just don't feel that place is on CodeProject
Michael
CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
|
A wiki can of course not replace the old article system, but it can extend it. We need a wiki because we can combine difference nice aspects that way!
The articles about the win32 api can be replaced by a wiki, but not all the other articles.
Don't try it, just do it!
|
|
|
|
|
I like wiki concept.
Is not a comitee, is like a consensual style of writing. Useful for a knowledge base.
I know of dotnet.wikis.com, but I like more a wiki on the style of wikipedia, powered by wikimedia.
I'm not aware of a wiki implemented on .Net with all the features of wikimedia, if you can find a good one, would be cool, a wiki of .Net using php doesn't looks good.
BTW, I have the resources to start a mediawiki, but again, I like to see it over asp.net.
Eduardo Diaz
site | english blog | spanish blog
|
|
|
|
|
Did Web8 have bran for breakfast?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
