make a overloaded constructor of a class with mandatory implementation in the inherited class in c#

Question

0.00/5 (No votes)

See more:

Make a overloaded constructor of a class with mandatory implementation in the inherited class in c#

Class A with constructor A(string A1, string A2)

Class B inherits class A

In this inheriting class I want to mandate the implementation of the base constructor A(string A1, string A2)

If this is not used in the inheriting class compilation error should come for class B.

Thanks in advance for the help

Thanks
Venkat

Posted 13-Apr-10 1:45am

venkat101978

Updated 13-Apr-10 4:47am

Keith Barrow

v3

Add a Solution

2 solutions

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Keith Barrow · Answer 1 · 2010-04-13T04:52:00

You can't mandate it like you can with a method overload, as constructors are not inherited. Equally, if you try and compile new B ("Foo", "Bar") against your example above, you'll get a compile error, so in most circumstances (e.g. non-reflective and non dynamic (in the C# 4 sense) code this shouldn't be a problem.

NavnathKale · Answer 2 · 2010-04-13T02:36:00

Solution 1

Constructors can't be abstract

;P

Posted 13-Apr-10 2:36am

NavnathKale