|
Not caching - Database. We're all-hands-on-deck this morning working to fix the issue.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
"Object reference not set to an instance of an object. (Ticket: 2014984, Server: Web02). We've logged the issue and will fix ASAP. Click here to return to the homepage"
Happened a few times while trying to post about it
--edit
Sidebar was gone too, but it is back again. Using Edge.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
In today's email, the link for "Software Development is very subjective" is incorrect, it points to the next article in the list ("Why edge computing matters...")
|
|
|
|
|
I've checked all the links. They all seem fine. Also I can't find the stories you mention, am I looking at the wrong email?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, it was from the mailing last Thursday, I'm a little behind on my reading. I see someone has corrected the link, thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. All fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
We are now receiving duplicate messages from the forums, as well as from QA comments.
[edit]
Well it was definitely happening a while ago, but now seems to have reverted to normal.
Do we have a rogue hamster in the team?
[/edit]
modified 18-Aug-22 10:53am.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please forward the dupes (including headers) to me at chris@codeproject.com?
[Edit: I got your email, so thanks for that. You mentioned it was an isolated issue. We're sure the issue is a spurious retry due to a small outage. Fixable, but low on the list today]
cheers
Chris Maunder
modified 24-Aug-22 9:19am.
|
|
|
|
|
From the top of the page when github link is added:
Please Note: This article has been imported from GitHub. Each time you make a commit to your GitHub repo this article will be automatically regenerated. If you need to make changes please update your repository's Readme.MD file isntead of editing this article directly
`isntead` should be `instead`
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed, and waiting to be deployed.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please email the images to submit@codeproject.com (we're happy to fix for you), or simply try re-uploading them yourself. Not sure why they worked in preview yet aren't reported as being present on our servers...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Not sure why they worked in preview yet aren't reported as being present on our servers
The only thing that I could note is the decimal in the name of the file before the image type file extension. Not sure if that is an issue or not.
Graeme
"I fear not the man who has practiced ten thousand kicks one time, but I fear the man that has practiced one kick ten thousand times!" - Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Well spotted but no, that shouldn't be an issue.
(And Hi Graeme! How's things?)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately we can't move questions, answers, and comments, just de-activate the other account.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean, I guess you should let it stand as it is a recent question.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: This member doesn't quite have enough reputation to be able to display their biography and homepage.
Could we (at least the protectors) have a button to make the biography and homepage visible on demand? That could help identifying potential spammers with a higher certainty.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
if you hover over name you will get their profile popup which summarizes their information, including rep.
Yours looks like

Is there something we should add to make identifying spammers easier, without compromising member privacy.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
The biography and home-page would be useful. For example, this member[^]'s name suggests they may be a spammer, but since they don't have enough rep points to show the bio and home page, we can't tell whether there's anything dodgy in there.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
That' it. Thanks Richard
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Now I understand. This member actually has a Bio and homepage but you can't see it.
Maybe we need to allow member of sufficient rep or in certain groups to see them regardless of the message author's rep.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Dennis wrote: This member actually has a Bio and homepage but you can't see it. Exactly
Matthew Dennis wrote: Maybe we need to allow member of sufficient rep or in certain groups to see them regardless of the message author's rep. Or as I suggested in the first message, a "protectors only" button, that make it visible for us if needed.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's just a click from the profile popup to the profile page if you need more.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|