|
I tried bookmarking Pete's new tip:
Let's Get Implicit With Our Tests[^]
The bookmark icon changes appropriately (gets an icon with a "+" on it), but when I go to my bookmarks, it does not appear.
I am using:
Google Chrome Version 55.0.2883.87 m
Windows 7 Enterprise Service Pack 1
I have disabled Chrome extensions to verify that it still does not work.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a Tip, so you need to select the Tips&Tricks tab at the top of the bookmarks page.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see a Tips & Tricks tab...or any tabs. The only menus are the normal ones -> home | articles | quick answers | discussions | features | community | help
How do I get to the bookmarks page you are talking about? I went to my profile, then clicked "My Bookmarks". I also tried clicking directly on the "My Bookmarks" link in the drop-down of my name.
|
|
|
|
|
Go to your bookmarks page and look at the tabs below the text which states: Your other bookmarks:
|
|
|
|
|
That's the page he means: here's mine when I first open it: Bookmarks1.jpg (211.2 KB)
If I click on "Tip/Trick" the list changes: Bookmarks2.jpg (202.6 KB) which is what Sean is talking about. You should be able to see the bookmark there.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
My page does not look like that. When I click on "My Bookmarks" from the dropdown of my user name, it takes me directly to a page that says "Your Article Bookmarks on CodeProject" at about the same location on the page where the tabs are showing on your image. Underneath that, it says "There are no bookmarks for this item type." in a smaller font.
|
|
|
|
|
Still the case?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
At the home page a user can "Set the Site Filter". Great. To clarify, I am talking about the Tag filter. The problem is that when I search, I am presented with all items that contain my search string, but, my "Site Filter" setting does not appear to be respected. I get WAY too many replies.
And once not on the home page I can't set the Tag filter to a different choice. Is there some other setting to activate my filter settings. Is there any help for this feature. I can't find even that.
I realy like this website, but without the site filter, or at least with incorrect usage, the site is frustrating to use.
-- modified 20-Jan-17 15:14pm.
|
|
|
|
|
The filter you refer to affects only the Home Page: specifically it filters the Articles in the list immediately below it.
You can do a filtered search by looking under the "Articles" menu, then "Search". On that page, you can select "Tags" from the "Match" drop down.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply. However, that functionality is not well thought out. When I am in articles and I search for say "downloader", I get over 3742 results, but most of them not for "android", regardless of my "Site Filter".
If I then select "Tags" as Match I get zero. That tells me that the filter does not recognize "Android", but in fact is looking for the tag "downloader".
If I then change the search to "android" I get 181 replies, but mostly other than "downloader. So there is the run-around.
If I then change the search string to "downloader tag: android", I get 3767, now all for android and related to downloader. Perfect.
So what's the point of the "site filter" or the "Match" function when I have to use a boolean to really get what I am looking for.
Sorry, but this gets me back to my first line, "functionality not well thought out". I suggest am rethink on the purpose of those 2 functions and in particular what the inputs actually may consist of. Or get rid of the 2 functions and let the boolean do the work (it works really well, and the data is there. And it is good).
|
|
|
|
|
In the "Write an Article" Tags dropdown, the right most column under Topics.
I'm pretty sure it isn't spelled "Androiid"
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Which dropdown?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry - should have done a screenshot: Androiid.jpg (283.7 KB) 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Ah - that's a user-created tag. I'll merge it with the correct one.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
There have been a number of questions from mostly new members about being flagged as spammers. It may be useful to create an explanation page which users can look at to get clarification about these issues and which could be linked to when answering their questions.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Ir would be useful to put a link to this page in the warning message.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Yes that may help but it wouldn't provide as much information as a paragraph of explanation.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Why? I am talking about linking to the explanation page here.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I'm not aware of an explanation page (that explains moderation etc)and you haven't provided a link. If there is such a page why wasn't it referenced in response to this question The Lounge[^] ?
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
You seem to misunderstand me. There isn't a page like this currently. I was suggesting that, once it was created, the spam warning message should link to that page.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I completely got it wrong. We're in alignment now and I fully agree with you.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Can you show me an example? Or describe a scenario? I want to make sure we're talking about members getting marked as spammers incorrectly, not questions being reported too quickly and too aggressively and getting closed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's about users being picked up by the spam filter which can be a touch aggressive at times. It was possibly prompted by this thread[^].
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like we could just change the moderation message to be a little more specific then.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Item still open? It is still marked as "in progress" on the list of the right side
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
