|
At least the response is still quick!
I'm using Chrome, but I've tried FireFox, which at least gives me 2-3 seconds to view the post's contents before sweeping it away in a blank abyss to do the refresh.
Don't get me started on IE8.
|
|
|
|
|
MatthysDT wrote: 2-3 seconds to view the post's contents
[PRINT SCREEN]!
|
|
|
|
|
As a work around try changing your layout to Expand Posts and Replies. YOu'll have to do more scrolling but all posts will be open so you will be able to read them as they download.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
MatthysDT wrote: but if I dare click on any topic/post before the last one has loaded on the bottom of the page, the entire page refreshes in order to display the one I clicked on.
I noticed this behavior sometimes even in a fast connection. If we expand a forum message before the page getting loaded, whole page will refresh again. I don't think that problem is related to connection speed.
|
|
|
|
|
Arun Jacob wrote: I don't think that problem is related to connection speed.
It isn't. There were a couple of threads a few weeks ago on this very topic, starting about here[^]
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
It's not, but having to wait 5 seconds to begin reading messages is a minor annoyance; having to wait 5 minutes is a show stopper.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I added a fix last week - how is it now for you?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've just gotten an e-mail, telling me that an alternate has been posted to my tip/trick.
I was able to read the content of the alternate in the e-mail, but when I open the tip/trick, the alternate doesn't appear.
I checked the message at the top of this forum, and under 'Recent changes' it says
16-Jun-10 Regular users can't see tip/trick alternate just posted
When it's under 'Recent changes', it means that it should have been fixed, right?
I've tried Ctrl+F5 a few times, but it's still not showing up.
Edit: It's visible now, but isn't this still a bug?
modified on Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
The alternate was "pending", i.e. awaiting moderation. I made it publicly available, so it should be visible to all now.
IMO it is silly you're signaled but not allowed to see it; of course, you should be allowed to participate in the moderation process of an alternate to your own T&T.
|
|
|
|
|
I was actually considering if this was because of some kind of "approval" process, but as you said, the poster of the tip should be able to moderate his/her own tip/tricks.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, this is something we overlooked. You should be able to moderate alternates of your own tip/trick. I've created a high priority task for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Thiru.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. You either see three answers (a real one, and two deleted but still readable) or you see just one; it depends on you being signed on with sufficient karma or not. And the count reflects the number of answers you can actually see.
|
|
|
|
|
In this case, no. The count, currently, reflects the total number of answers. An over-zealous correction caused an over-correction. It will be fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I object. When I logged out, the count (on the page itself) went down to 1. So it looks fine from here.
|
|
|
|
|
My apologies, Luc. You are correct.
Having a better look into Johnny's issues after caffeine.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I accept.
Funny thing is, even when I defend your code, you tend to contradict me?
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Funny thing is, even when I defend your code, you tend to contradict me?
You guys have been together too long. 
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like you want any one of them to be with you for some time now! 
|
|
|
|
|
FYI: I see one real reply (mine) and two deleted. I see that they are deleted, but I don't see the text...
|
|
|
|
|
Johnny J. wrote: two deleted. I see that they are deleted, but I don't see the text...
I don't see a way for me to get into that state; but even then IMO the count is correct. If I were to add an (almost) empty answer, it should increment the count too.
|
|
|
|
|
IMO if an answer is deleted it doesn't exist (anymore)
|
|
|
|
|
you can't just ignore and not count it as long as one or more of these hold true:
- it takes real-estate on the page
- it has metadata (author, date, ...)
- it may have comments
- it may have votes
- its content is readable to some people (not sure why that is, but it is).
|
|
|
|