|
Sander Rossel wrote: +5'ed me and left a comment
The latter can be proven, but the former is only a guess based on what that person wrote in his message.
I even made my virtual vote look like a real one because I used the "General" type message, whereas the poster you are referring to actually posted a "Question" type message. Since you can't choose the type of message when actually voting you can't really be sure that the person voted even if they say so in their message.
It take it you're not just trying to push your article this way. 
Does that sound plausible to you? 
Regards,
— Manfred
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, let me explain in full detail what happened.
So I got an upvote and the voter left a comment. I went to check and had 13 votes total (the vote is also in my rep history).
This morning I checked my rep history and I noticed I got another upvote (big one, +80 points), but the vote total was still 13.
I also did not get the 80 points according to the reputationer.
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
A-ha! I actually just found, when I went to my article overview to check your virtual vote, that my overview shows 16 votes, while my article only shows 14.
So there IS something fishy going on here. And no, I don't try to push my article. Great articles don't need pushing 
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
No, you didn't get what I have said. Read my message again 
thatrajaCode converters | Education Needed
No thanks, I am all stocked up. - Luc Pattyn
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is - Henry Minute
|
|
|
|
|
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
There's a delay between votes being cast and them showing up on the article's summary due to caching.
|
|
|
|
|
Noted! 
I had just never noticed this behaviour before and thought something might be wrong.
It's an OO world.
public class Sander : Lazy<Person>{
public void DoWork(){ throw new NotImplementedException(); }
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can also see another problem with the contact form: Your phone number is just a bunch of colored squiggles!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
And the text in the postcode box seems to be a random one.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
And I'm pretty sure you're not in the US.
Working on fixing that phone squiggle first. Then I'll attack the rest of the issues.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Working on fixing that phone squiggle first.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
A discovered a bug in the article section selection.
Steps to reproduce:
- Start a new article
- Select
Client Side Scripting -> JavaScript - Save the Draft
- Leave the Page
- Edit the Draft
The section will now be Client Side Scripting -> Beginners and JavaScript is no longer an option in the Subsection list.
I discovered this while working on my Jooshe article which I had to file as Client Side Scripting -> General.
modified 24-Dec-13 7:39am.
|
|
|
|
|
Does CodeProject team plan to provide regular data dump of articles or other contents for offline browsing ?
FYI, Stack Overflow provides this feature on a monthly basis (http://www.clearbits.net/torrents/2155-sept-2013).
OriginalGriff suggested me to ask Chris in the Site Bugs / Suggestions forum if he is willing to add it, suspecting he might not...
Thank you !
|
|
|
|
|
Do you really want to trawl through three months worth of XML looking for some particular article, when you can download it yourself any time you like?
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Richard,
Thank you for your reply.
Unfortunately I cannot download article from CodeProject any time I like due to limited internet access.
If Code Project team plans to provide regular data dump of articles or other contents for offline browsing, I would expect an offline browser as well.
FYI, Stack Overflow provides Stackdump, an offline browser trawling through off-line XML data :
http://stackapps.com/questions/3610/stackdump-an-offline-browser-for-stackexchange-sites[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Member 1685862 wrote: I cannot download article from CodeProject any time I like due to limited internet access.
So how do you plan to download three months' worth?
Veni, vidi, abiit domum
|
|
|
|
|
Richard,
My previous reply was not clear enough. Sorry for the confusion.
My internet access is only limited when I need to work in areas where no internet access is available.
At home, I can download data dumps without problem.
I hope this answers your question.
|
|
|
|
|
Then download all the articles you want or need to have when you are at home, and then use them in you work or wherever you are.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
There may be plans afoot.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 1685862 wrote: Does CodeProject team plan to provide regular data dump of articles or other contents for offline browsing
No we don't
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OriiginalGriff Reported my question[^]. and then he says [^]its not my question its someone who commented my question without notifying other about this so I get reports with no reason and my question was closed.
Kindly look into this and take off the reports I received.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
