|
Countered them, and came to the conclusion the one-voter is of equal reputation as me (so you now have a bunch of 3's in the, hey at least it's no longer grey )
|
|
|
|
|
I've had a word with the person responsible.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Were the 1s removed?
Playing devil's advocate here. What if whoever voted eleven 1s to John's posts in that thread was doing it because he felt those posts deserved 1s? How do you decide if it's someone blindly voting 1s versus someone actually thinking those votes deserve 1s?
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know if it's possible but I think so.
11 1-votes is enough to be suspicious.
Then Chris could just compare the time stamps on those votes.
If they all occurred from the same person in under a minute or 2 it's blindly voting cause I don't think you can read 11 posts in 2 min (and all the reply's as to get a good understanding).
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: 11 1-votes is enough to be suspicious. Then Chris could just compare the time
stamps on those votes. If they all occurred from the same person in
under a minute or 2 it's blindly voting cause I don't think you can read 11
posts in 2 min (and all the reply's as to get a good understanding).
Well you could read an entire thread and then do the voting in one go. It's kinda subjective - voting I mean, so you can't always assume someone's blindly abusing the voting system.
When I posted about christian-conversion in India in the GIT forum, one Platinum member gave me six 1 votes in a space of 1 minute. He admitted it too later on. Of course I didn't get my knickers in a knot over it since I just ignored it and moved on. But point is, while I think his votes were unfair I also believe he was within his rights to vote as he wished. The last thing I want is someone like Chris playing morality advocate and deleting those votes and saving me those -96 points.
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant Sivakumar wrote: Well you could read an entire thread and then do the voting in one go. It's kinda subjective - voting I mean, so you can't always assume someone's blindly abusing the voting system.
I guess that's true but can you then honestly claim that you have a problem with every single one of the posts you one-voted.
Or did you (not you per se ) just have a problem with one of the posts and decided that all the rest of the post should suffer as well.
But as you say voting is highly subjective, a post I might consider funny someone else might consider it insulting.
|
|
|
|
|
That gets my 5 - why is everyone so bothered about reputation?
|
|
|
|
|
I said "I've had a word with the person responsible".
I didn't say I'd removed anything.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I said "I've had a word with the person responsible". I didn't say
I'd removed anything.
Thanks Chris. Good to know.
|
|
|
|
|
That's all I wanted.
Thanks.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Time for the gun, eh?
"Don't confuse experts with facts" - Eric_V
|
|
|
|
|
awww, poor baby! I've garnered more than 50 1-votes in the past. Suck it up, chump!
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams You must accept one of two basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe, or we are not alone in the universe. And either way, the implications are staggering” - Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
ahmed zahmed wrote: I've garnered more than 50 1-votes in the past. I'm glad, mine was just 30+ 1-votes.
Have 5 for compensation!
thatraja
My Tip/Tricks My Dad had a Heart Attack on this day so don't...
All these are my opinions. Different people. different way of thinking. I am no one to judge others - Chandru
|
|
|
|
|
You think he wants a whaaaamburger with his cries?
Martin Fowler wrote: Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.
|
|
|
|
|
How do you know that the discussions in the Chinese and Indian forums are of the general kind? Since there's only one forum for each language, simply "<language> Forum" would make a more correct title.
|
|
|
|
|
Bassam Abdul-Baki wrote: How do you know that the discussions in the Chinese and Indian forums are of the general kind
Because that's what I've defined them to be. I'm trusting in the community and the moderators to keep things in order. "Forum" doesn't provide any guidance.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The various editors that are currently in place for writing messages answers, etc, are driving me crazy. Moving the mouse outside the edit field causes the text to scroll to the top of the message being type. Please put it back to the way it was and stop hholding our hands while we type. I know you guys are trying to make the site better, but this crap is really starting to PISS ME OFF. It's almost IMPOSSIBLE to type a message.
I liken the automatic paste detection to that MS Word abomination, "Clippy".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Moving the mouse outside the edit field causes the text to scroll to the top of the message being type
I have tried and tried and cannot for the life of me replicate what you are seeing. Walk me through it, please. My understanding is
In IE7 or 8:
- you type a message that's more than 1 line, and, say, more than 1 page. The mouse is at the bottom of the text
- you move the mouse outside the message edit box (and click elsewhere on the form our outside the browser window?) and the text box scrolls so that you are now viewing the first line. Is the cursor also being moved?
This is a bug or it's an issue with your setup. I can be nasty and vindictive, but even this is beyond my evil schemes. I'll work to make life less unpleasant.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I was encoutering it with IE9, but haven't noticed it lately.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
"The OP herself was not sure about her question"
"The OP is from India and I know what she meant." - Shameel
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to duplicate it, but couldn't. I know I'm not crazy though.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: I know I'm not crazy though.
I would never suggest such a thing.
Ever.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Insane isn't the same as crazy.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Probably best, for safety sake
|
|
|
|
|
You're not crazy, at least in this regard. I was experiencing the same thing for a while when in IE9. Doesn't seem to happen now though.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
"The OP herself was not sure about her question"
"The OP is from India and I know what she meant." - Shameel
|
|
|
|
|
I've had this in IE9 on Win 7. I pasted a code block in Q&A, then selecting one the pre-tag variants (c#/c++ etc) and the pre tags ended up at the start of the text. It doesn't happen each time (though it has happened more than once), to be honest I thought I'd clicked the mouse button by mistake, leaving the cursor at the top of the text box. The text box had several lines in it(my reply to c# related query and problem regarding functions in classes[^] in fact) if that helps you replicate the problem.
|
|
|
|