|
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but for someone want to download the PDF it can be a bit problematic to check something not there...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
There is no checkbox on that page, I know.
I was referring to the check in "My Settings".
|
|
|
|
|
It has been fixed - enjoy!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Just started getting this. Did NOT sign up for it. Have tried to unsubscribe at least 3 times and yet continue to get it.
I enjoy the Daily News article, that one I did sign up for. I consider this SPAM and don't appreciate:
1) Being auto-signed up for it just because I get the Daily News
2) The unsub function not working.
Fix your sh*t. Please.
|
|
|
|
|
Please send me the next copy of the Daily Build that you receive. You're not subscribed to it so you shouldn't be getting it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't fully thought this through, but I though I'd just throw this out there... 
<context>I've heard a bit of talk lately about "decreasing quality of articles" and surprise over the fact that some "articles" get through, when they are clearly tips, if even that.</context>
Anyway, at the moment each pending item has a "unpublished version only" forum attached to it where we are supposed to be commenting about the articles, but I don't see these forums being used much.
What if we had a single, permanent, mods-rep-only forum where we could discuss pending items? 
Sometimes we don't want the author of the pending item to see what we are saying about his article - for example, it gets a bit awkward when prominent mods publicly disagree in front of the author...
Also, such a forum might encourage more consistent approval/disapproval of pending items, as then there would be only one place to go to discuss pending items, not heaps and heaps of item-specific forums that disappear once the "invisible verdict" is given for each one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just to tell...Moderator's forum isn't used too much (most cases are articles that approved but somebody do not understand why - for that there is no other place to go), however it would be nice to list moderator forum in the forums list...
In day-by-day work we comment on the pending article and vote...And I think that it works good...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
At the top right of the reporting dropdown is a link to the moderator's forum. I can think of no better (and appropriate) place to have that link 
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Aha!
I missed that.
I actually didn't know about that forum until you showed me. 
|
|
|
|
|
I sometimes get a filter in quick questions that I did not enter.
Is it possibly picking up someone else's settings?
|
|
|
|
|
Are you clicking one of the topics (Android, SQL, etc) on the homepage under "Latest Articles"?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I may have done - I'm not seeing this issue at the moment.
I'll see if I can track down what steps I did...
|
|
|
|
|
OK - I got this:-
Sorry, no entries were found matching tags VB.NET, C++, C++/CLI, C, VC6, VC7, VC7.1, VC8.0, VC9.0, VC10.0, VC11.0, VC12.0 after I had previously been on the C++ articles tab so that seems to be the cause.
|
|
|
|
|
It no goes to this link: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Answers/Post.aspx?aid=[post-id][^] The page opens up is empty and (using new editor?). Also the green 'submit' button is wrong...
...30 minutes later...
Now the page displays the old editor and the button is back as before, it also displays the expected content (except preview which seems to be ages behind the editor). However the page looks like the 'ask a question' page and not the 'improve the question' as I remember it...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
modified 22-Jun-14 15:36pm.
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on the post.
A long, long time ago we allowed HTML posts in QA and so some old questions may have the old HTML format. I remember reasonably recently I put in place some code to ensure everything was converted to the text-with-HTML that we use. Clearly that 100% watertight code leaked.
Can you point me to the question that showed the WYSIWYG editor?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You missed the point - for an half hour I saw an other page when hit 'improve' button. The page displayed the new editor, messed up with the submit button and didn't show the original content. After half an hour the editor was back to the old one, the button got fixed and content was in place...But! Now I get a side not with the 'A few simple rules when posting your question.' like I'm to post a new question and not editing it - that wasn't there before...
And it now happening me with all questions...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've received a few comments and criticisms on my blog feeds because the readers believe they are full-fledged articles.
I write both articles and blog entries. I definitely do put more time in polishing the articles that I post.
While the blog entries are serial in nature, cover a small topic, and by themselves could appear to be incomplete.
Could the fact that an article originates from a blog be made a little more prominent in the display of these articles.
I like the feature of feeding my blog to CP and getting the extra readers, and I would like to continue to feed my posts here. However, I would prefer to discuss the technical content with the readers rather than trying to explain to them that it isn't an article.
|
|
|
|
|
It should be separated, in the moderation queue there are different tabs and in the item itself it should be a "type" on the upper right corner.
Is that mixing? If not... I think the readers should pay a bit more attention
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
