15,911,711 members
Sign in
Sign in
Email
Password
Forgot your password?
Sign in with
home
articles
Browse Topics
>
Latest Articles
Top Articles
Posting/Update Guidelines
Article Help Forum
Submit an article or tip
Import GitHub Project
Import your Blog
quick answers
Q&A
Ask a Question
View Unanswered Questions
View All Questions
View C# questions
View C++ questions
View Javascript questions
View Visual Basic questions
View Python questions
discussions
forums
CodeProject.AI Server
All Message Boards...
Application Lifecycle
>
Running a Business
Sales / Marketing
Collaboration / Beta Testing
Work Issues
Design and Architecture
Artificial Intelligence
ASP.NET
JavaScript
Internet of Things
C / C++ / MFC
>
ATL / WTL / STL
Managed C++/CLI
C#
Free Tools
Objective-C and Swift
Database
Hardware & Devices
>
System Admin
Hosting and Servers
Java
Linux Programming
Python
.NET (Core and Framework)
Android
iOS
Mobile
WPF
Visual Basic
Web Development
Site Bugs / Suggestions
Spam and Abuse Watch
features
features
Competitions
News
The Insider Newsletter
The Daily Build Newsletter
Newsletter archive
Surveys
CodeProject Stuff
community
lounge
Who's Who
Most Valuable Professionals
The Lounge
The CodeProject Blog
Where I Am: Member Photos
The Insider News
The Weird & The Wonderful
help
?
What is 'CodeProject'?
General FAQ
Ask a Question
Bugs and Suggestions
Article Help Forum
About Us
Search within:
Articles
Quick Answers
Messages
Comments by chandrAN2& (Top 22 by date)
chandrAN2&
25-Jul-16 6:37am
View
I dont understand the reason for the error? What the error implies?
chandrAN2&
25-Jul-16 6:36am
View
Thanks.. with typedef only i got the error..i forget to add typedef,sorry
typedef void (*callback_fn_ptr)(myStruct *ptr); //error "typedef 'callback_fn_ptr' is initialized (use decltype instead)
typdedef void (*callback_fn_ptr)(struct A *ptr); //no error
chandrAN2&
22-Jul-16 9:11am
View
cat /proc/timers. I could see timer resolution of 1ns? Is that means 1ns resolution is supported right? If so the process will be put to sleep for 1ns ?
chandrAN2&
22-Jul-16 9:00am
View
Thanks for your reply. I am not talking about absolute timing. My question here is kernel supports 1ns timer granularity? If so how via sleep or busyloop(bogus mips?)
chandrAN2&
21-Mar-16 22:19pm
View
Thanks for your reply. Any books which you recommend to understand on this Multicore(linux) related topics or any articles.
chandrAN2&
4-Dec-15 11:06am
View
http://www.linfo.org/root_filesystem.html
chandrAN2&
4-Dec-15 11:05am
View
Are you saying there is no such thing as root file system?
chandrAN2&
4-Dec-15 11:04am
View
i didn't get what you are telling
chandrAN2&
4-Dec-15 10:02am
View
Thanks ..I have the doubt like how the root file system is created? Say root file system contain already some file ? After mounting we are using /bin/file to launch an executable right? so how this file is already stored under /bin in the disk?
chandrAN2&
25-Nov-15 12:51pm
View
Understood , thanks. If carry flag is not cleared, did ASR instruction use the carry bit vale while right shifting?
chandrAN2&
25-Nov-15 6:44am
View
Thanks for the info, but in the above case what is the reason for the NOP in between. There is no alignment problem here, all are 4byte ARM instructions.
And Debugging related options are not enabled here. Final is the timing issues which i don't understand,you mean due to pipelining, result may not be available for the next operation?Is that what you say. For that nop is not needed, this only results in pipeline stall for few cycles or instruction scheduling should change, compiler optimization will come into picture for instrcution scheduling. But i don't exactly get the reason for the above code generation.
chandrAN2&
24-Nov-15 7:16am
View
https://www.cs.cornell.edu/~tomf/notes/cps104/twoscomp.html .
The above link nicely explain why the 2's complement is working for negative numbers.
Thanks for your clear explanation
chandrAN2&
24-Nov-15 7:14am
View
Thanks Dave
chandrAN2&
23-Nov-15 8:25am
View
sorry i didn't got it. could you please comment on the example which i mentioned above?
chandrAN2&
26-Oct-15 9:06am
View
This problem is not always happening. Once in a while(once or twice per day) only this is happening.
It it is a compiler bug, then the issue should occur always.
This only confusing me, that's why I suspect hardware malfunction may results in this kind of behaviour.
One more doubt is how we strongly believe that hardware problem is unlikely.
Why we trust the processor or related hardware 100%(interested in knowing the answer).
chandrAN2&
4-Sep-15 6:28am
View
I have tried few links , in most of the article mainly they are talking about basics of arm programming like registers and operating modes and all those stuffs.
But not about the arm syntax like characters used in arm assembly like =, ! etc..
chandrAN2&
3-Sep-15 0:46am
View
particularly talking about syntax and semantics..
chandrAN2&
3-Sep-15 0:46am
View
Any link for Arm reference Manual.
chandrAN2&
23-Aug-15 13:46pm
View
Thanks for your reply. Is both code and data are position independant. I am asking this because, based on pc relative address code may be generated for position independant loading, but for data what is the case? How position independant code come into picture for data section. Because in ARM site, it is mentioned that both code and data may be position independant. Could someone clarify?
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0203g/Bcfbbdec.html
chandrAN2&
2-Aug-15 8:16am
View
Thanks Sergey for your brief explanation.
chandrAN2&
2-Aug-15 7:45am
View
Thanks Richard, But if the critical section is accessible in interrupt context , we can disable interrupts, But we don't need this disable interrupts option for normal critical section of code accessible by tasks right? so in this case what will be the behavior?
chandrAN2&
2-Aug-15 7:20am
View
I am clear with critical section or interrupt latency. I want to know how multiple tasks running with same priority creates a longer critical section duration in kernel.
It means kernel is spending lot of time inside the critical section if multiple tasks running with same priority. How multiple tasks running with same priority takes more processing time?
Show More