|
Well, nice catch. Such signatures are acceptable if its his 'own work' (Now,its a whole new topic how to define 'own' here). We spotted a large list of users with such signatures in past.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
so if the dll-loader throws some better diagnosis and recover should happen.
Fine idea.
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would say no. Theres no advertisement. Its just poorly phrased/Offtopic question. You took the correct action IMO.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
This rare research papers presented a step by step tutorial of injecting malicious spyware program into any executable by using IDA Pro and OllyDbg.
Should this type of article be allowed?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO - NO! I think no code that intentionally made to harm should be allowed...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
This article[^] and the sequel[^] are tagged as C++, Windows where they should be tagged at least "PHP". Also the article is composed of a brief explanation of the scalability issue followed, in the second part, by the proposal of third party software and the general tone of the article resembles advertising rather than a technical article.
I'm writing here instead of reporting or downvoting because I'm quite new in the community and I don't know how this kind of situations are normally treated.
|
|
|
|
|
There are tons of blog here which seem more like site driving or advertising. But, they are not posted ones, they are automatically getting polled by CP.
Further, there are too many arguments open on to which level,this should be tolerated. I would suggest you to wait for some time.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: There are tons of blog here which seem more like site driving or advertising
Are you reporting them? We can very easily remove a blog feed when we are made aware that it's spam.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Are you reporting them?
No. But i have came across many of them. Recently,someone(I am not sure) has raised this in SA watch. Well, i will let you know if i find any  .
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As far as I can see it's not published. Lately I've noticed that blog entries seem to have the "already published" link. But if you click that, it'll take you to a pending version.
|
|
|
|
|
I've reformatted.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report this on SA forum as i suggested in below thread.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes it is. Such posts should be reported at Spam and Abuse Watch[^]
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
No content at all, just a link to nuget.
Here[^]
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello
Any organization is like a tree full of monkeys. The monkeys on top look down and see a tree full of smiling faces. The monkeys on the bottom look up and see nothing but assholes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do too, but it's already approved.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
You can still report it. The author gets notified and hopefully modifies the type. If not, and necessary amount of reports are given the article gets removed, as has happened to the article in question.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh OK.
Chris's has removed it, but I'll know for next time thanks.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
