|
I run Win7 on an 8 core, 16GB machine and still have to wait sometimes...
I would like you try and run those configurations... 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
He didn't say it would run well - he just said it would run. The cited specs are the "absolute minimum" required to run the OS (probably with a lot of the stuff switched off or not installed to begin with).
Microsoft can't make claims as to what's required by apps installed on said OS.
Up until about a year ago, I was running Win7 32-bit on a single core box with 2gb of RAM (at work) - and trying to develop on it. They finally upgraded my box to a 12-core(!)/16gb machine running win7/64-bit. It's a retired database server.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: I was running Win7 32-bit on a single core box with 2gb of RAM (at work)
Same for my wife but only 1,5 Gb RAM. My wife doesn't want to buy a new laptop as long as the old one is "running". Laptop is from 2005 or 2006... it works under Win7 (she had Vista but liked 7 more when she saw it in my laptop).
You can start something (i.e. Outlook) and go out do something else and come back some minutes later before it is finally ready to work.
But... as long as she doesn't get pissed from it... I am happy.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Can't you upgrade the RAM on it?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Pity is that the laptop only has 2 slots (currently occupied with 1x 1 Gb and 1x 512 Mb, PC2-4200). I still have 2x 512 Mb but I can only use them as replacement, it doesn't improve anything.
I bought a brand new laptop (mid-low class) for her taunt some time ago for approx. 275€, so 20+ € for an improve of 512 RAM or 30+ € for additional 1,5 Gb is too much for her.
I offered her an old SSD of mine and her answer was... "never change a running system"
As I said... I am happy that it doesn't piss her off (yet)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a i7 (4 cores with hyperthreading = 8 core) and 8GB ram. when I bought it about 1 year ago, it was running Win 8.1 and it started up in about 15 seconds and it was blazing fast. Unfortunately (due to cost) it does not have an SSD.
It responded exactly as I expected even while running Visual Studio and/or Android Studio. i was completely happy.
Once I was taken over by Win10, I have had tons of I/O problems. I can always tell when crazy I/O is going on because the fans kick on and everything slows down. I take a look and my disk goes to 100% usage. At that point the machine may as well be an old Celeron. I/O kills everything.
And it seems to me that Windows does some crazy I/O and every web browser out there is writing to your disk often.
Also, if you have virus scanners they go crazy on I/O too.
Obviously I/O has always been a bottleneck, but it's amazingly bad in contrast to modern RAM and processors.
I know, I just need to buy an SSD but they are still high for comparative size (1TB). As a matter of fact, my entire computer only cost $699 and 1TB SSD is up around $250 or so.
|
|
|
|
|
That was my point, I was disputing the claim "ever increasing". My experience is quite the opposite - I've had my PC for 3 versions of Windows now (it was over-specced originally), and each new release seems to make it better, not worse.
In particular, installing Win 10, even as an upgrade, actually resulted in less disk space being consumed.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
John McAfee, the creator of the eponymous antivirus computer software system, sued Intel Corp. for the right to use his name in new ventures after the chip maker bought his former company. Maybe change your name to "MacAfee"?
As a bonus with the name change, people might forget he's crazy.
Maybe he could try using the uninstaller for the trademark on the name?
|
|
|
|
|
All Intel has to do is go find another McAfee and pay them!
(Since McAfee anti-virus has such a bad reputation--something even John McAfee says and promotes-- you'd think Intel would just drop the name.)
|
|
|
|
|
IT professionals are most likely, out of all working people, not to use their entire annual leave, according to a new Robert Walters Career Lifestyle Survey. The work will still be there when you get back
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: The work will still be there when you get back
In the case of one of our contract-to-hire people, no it wasn't. We "relieved" him of his future duties.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I figured there would be at least one story like that. It just seems so cold to axe a guy while on vacation. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Well... in my very first job after college it was not on vacations... I was "released of my duty" the first day after the Christmas holidays...
It was a tiny shock because I didn't expect it at all, but a couple of days later I realized, they did me a BIG favour.
As we said in Spain... new year, new life...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Just in the past year have I been using my vacation, fully; rarely use sick or personal. It took a little time to get control of things. Today is a holiday in the U.S. so I did not work, but worked full extra days Saturday and Sunday after a 5 day work week.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't use it because vacations are expensive and it's usually a nice payoff at the end.
|
|
|
|
|
NativeJIT is an open-source cross-platform library for high-performance just-in-time compilation of expressions involving C data structures. Because everyone else is doing JIT
|
|
|
|
|
Java 9 is coming! It’s just six more months until the scheduled release and besides the module system, it brings a couple of new language features and many new and improved APIs. All the features Oracle's been dragging their feet on for years. And more!
|
|
|
|
|
Due to a combination of design errors, bugs, and incorrect documentation, it is surprisingly hard to use .NET's HttpClient correctly. Documentation errors? Microsoft?!
|
|
|
|
|
This may explain a strange behaviour in an app I support - in which case many thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
However, if you try to apply this pattern to HttpClient, another IDisposable class, you trip over some rather unexpected problems...When you dispose it, it starts the process of closing the socket(s) that it controls. Which means you have to go through an entirely new connection cycle the next time you make a request.
I'm sorry, but my response is "well, like, duh." I knew that ages ago (I guess .NET 2.0, so yeah, maybe I had read the 1.10 doc) when I did some performance tests of opening/closing HttpClient connections when I was writing a client-server app. First thing I did actually was check the performance of constantly re-opening a new connection every time I wanted to talk to the server.
And wrapping an HttpClient is a using block? I don't even do that for a SQL connection. In fact, I rarely (and I mean, blood dripping rare) ever use using.
The DNS thing I never encountered because this was all intranet stuff.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I choice to use using rather than dealing with thread unsafe static/shared variables. Dealing with the later one quite a pain especially in web environment.
For sake of fixing the bug, Those teams that are working on HttpClient development should learn and adopt something from WCF team.
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
Wonde Tadesse wrote: I choice to use using rather than dealing with thread unsafe static/shared variables. Dealing with the later one quite a pain especially in web environment.
Well, I tend to throw async things into a workflow, which queues the work onto threads, so connections usually need to stay open because the response doesn't happen right when/where the listener connection is created.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
As general rule, Be very careful about static/shared variables in web environment. You'll get threading issues with their content.
Assuming that when you say "queue" you are talking about a message queue(RabbitMQ, ZeroMQ, NetMQ, MSMQ,...), I'll suggest to revise the design. Keep in mind also queue by itself has a network latency.
First of all I'll not wait an open connection till the message queue completed and send back a response. It doesn't make sense to me. What I'll do, Once a message comes, processing asynchronously, open the http connection, enqueue the message to the queue, then I will immediately send a response saying "you message are being processed" sort of thing and finally close the connection. Then I'll run another separate background process which will dequeue the message and process the necessary busy related task and send it back by opening another http connection.
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
I stopped reading at .NET
|
|
|
|
|
I started smiling then, in anticipation of a hearty belly-laugh. As usual, CP delivered the goods.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
