|
You know what? I actually thought of posting it the week after thanksgiving as I usually do, but with the new crowd here, I was not sure how it'd go. Most people would have just not gotten it 
|
|
|
|
|
Not if you add all the previous links to it. I miss the Lotus in particular.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-18 cores for affordable home PCs ($4000-ish).
|
|
|
|
|
And it has AVX512 which would be my reason for getting one, but it's still more expensive than it's worth to me. It also doesn't have a lot of the more advanced AVX512 extensions yet, such as AVX512-VBMI, or AVX512-BITALG.
|
|
|
|
|
Visual C++ supports AVX 512, but I am not entirely sure if the .NET GIT supports it today.
|
|
|
|
|
SIMD in .NET is in an unusable state anyway, but I've heard they're working on an API overhaul.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't but I would like to try one and a ThreadRipper too. I work on a very parallelized program (using OpenMP) and these are exactly the kind of machines it likes. I would love to have one of each and compare them with my program. As it is, we can't get enough power in one box so we have to have two or three more as clients. We would like to be able to have one box with a couple of those chips in it to the do the whole job.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure I can convince myself to buy one at its current price. But I am still thrilled that it is available and that a home user can buy it if he/she really wants to. Expensive for sure but not out of reach.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: but not out of reach
Speak for yourself! 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, people spend more on diamonds, don't they? 
|
|
|
|
|
Men buy diamonds for some special lady in their lives. Do you know what Herself will say, if I tell her that I bought a core i9 processor for her?  Instant divorce!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: Do you know what Herself will say, if I tell her that I bought a core i9 processor for her?
Well that's just wrong!
- the core i9's for yourself
- the flowers are are for her (if any chnnge left after #1, otherwise it's the neighbours roses)
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course! Thanks for putting me on the right track!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Now you are in trouble with both the wife as well as the neighbor whose roses you borrowed. 
|
|
|
|
|
If the neighbor gives me any hassle, I'll go over there and kick his dog! 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: Men buy diamonds for some special lady in their lives
Women want to have equal treatment, they should buy us brand new technology in return 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Women want to have equal superior treatment
EDIT: so do men
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
I tried both a Threadripper and i9
kept the i9, my workflow seemed much faster on both (compared to the two year old i7 I was using), but there was a problem with the Threadripper that made it a no go. There is no hardware accelerated emulators for Android on Windows, my workflow lately is SQL server, ASP.NET MVC, Azure App Services and combination of Xamarin and native, and well, it would take 7-9 minutes to boot an Android emulator, and running code on it would usually timeout the rest services.
It seems like Google and Intel have some kind of deal where the Android emulators on Windows only use some Intel processors, on Linux they support both AMD and Intel, but I develop on Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I don't work @intel.
In Word you can only store 2 bytes. That is why I use Writer.
|
|
|
|
|
cnet sigh, they gave us the "downloader" - download the downloader to download the software, why? well never figured out why (had to dig further to find the direct & website links), they've removed sorting options (no more sorting by user ratings).
Anyway wasn't looking for software, my portable mp3 player (older sony - looks like a small sausage) finally died, so searching for "best portable mp3 player 2017"
what comes up near tge top of the list?
.... "Best MP3 Players for 2018 - CNET"
2018?? they've already decided the best for next year?
FFS, what these useless fading websites do to try and stay relevant is just annoying.
I've already long given up reading cnet reviews, so obviously biased to whoever paid them the most
Signature ready for installation. Please Reboot now.
|
|
|
|
|
and your point is ?
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I remember when CNET was a good site...even had it bookmarked once upon a time. Now I avoid it like the plague!  (same for drivers sites)
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
I also remember Toms hardware...
|
|
|
|
|
cNet had it's time.... Usually when I was looking for more info on items Leo recommended on Call For Help
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
