|
Most of the developers can be a potential customer as well in this case. 
.AK.
|
|
|
|
|
I would say that would be very difficult so I would take the other approach.
Whenever I see a restaurant I want to visit I look for their website. So marketting isn't needed. However, I won't go to a restaurant if basic things aren't addressed on the web site:
1) Picture of Dining area
2) Suggested Attire
3) Hours
4) Location and Map (If I find a restaurant from the web this is crucial)
5) HTML Menu (I will view a pdf but it really ticks me off)
Same with a hotel, usually I land on a hotel's website through other means but make the decision to even bother based on the availability of the information that is important in a clear, non-obtuse manner.
Focus on that, the rest will follow. You can never compete with SEO spam, however.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And lets not forget this one 
Microsoft ... the only place where VARIANT_TRUE != true
|
|
|
|
|
On the up side, plastic surgeons and hair-dye manufacturers seem to be doing well in this straightened times.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll be curious to see Chuck Norris's response.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think you need to give up reading the Daily Mail website.
It's not good for the soul.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
The mails a good site, its a one pager, al there, one massive long page, no farting around with menus and crap. Just like a real newspaper.
|
|
|
|
|
It's tabloid junk that promotes paedophilia and is full of photos and no content.
Kitten block[^]
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
chriselst wrote: promotes paedophilia
How so?
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is tabloid junk, and that's the point!
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for that - you have made my wife's day. Herself has spent the last five minutes tapping my tablet and going "Aw!", "Eeeeee", and "Oh look!" - and she has a cold so every little helps!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
What was it Enfield said about women in that spoof black and white 30s sketch called "Women, know your place!" something about kittens and women going "Oooohhh!"
|
|
|
|
|
from the comments: A countdown for tracking when Emma Watson can be legally [censored]   Wow, new levels of low.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Low but hardly new. 15 years ago I ran into multiple sites counting down until the Olson Twins were legal. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
And yet there never was a site counting down until they were attractive.
|
|
|
|
|
Be kinda hard to do since that point is never getting any closer in time...
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
chriselst wrote: that promotes paedophilia and is full of photos and no content.
The first is nonsense.
The age of consent in the UK is 17. It is more complicated for ages slightly less than that but the UK, like many more intelligent places, recognizes that teenagers have sex. And two horny 15 year olds having sex are not pedophiles.
And anyone that thinks that sex with a 17 year old is the same as sex with a 7 year old is an idiot.
Not to mention of course that the specific person you reference later on is specifically someone that an actual pedophile would NOT want to have sex with because those individuals specifically do not want to have sex with individuals who look like they are sexually mature (regardless of their age.)
|
|
|
|
|
jschell wrote: The age of consent in the UK is 17.
16, but good start to your rebuttal.
jschell wrote: And anyone that thinks that sex with a 17 year old is the same as sex with a 7 year old is an idiot.
Very true.
jschell wrote: Not to mention of course that the specific person you reference later
I didn't mention anyone later on, although the link did, and one of those was 8 at the time. So, you equate sex with a 17 year old with sex with an 8 year old then. I'm glad we were able to find out your cutoff point.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I have to get gay porn up on another tab so I can quickly switch to that if someone were to come in.
|
|
|
|
|
Please do, and help fill the lakes (wink wink).
This space intentionally left blank.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, if you don't mind.
We don't have enough to share.
(Although it is raining as I write, but the proverbial drop in the bucket.)
What, me worry?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
