Why the WebMethod is static in code behind WebForm

Question

1.00/5 (1 vote)

See more:

I am calling code behind PageMethod, WebServices services to consume data using the ajax() function. When there is a necessity to consume data from code behind of the .aspx.cs page we declare some static function and then we consume this function using the ajax() function.

http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/dacca2/static-webmethod-in-code-behind-webform/[^]

Posted 21-Sep-14 19:54pm

manoj s sherje

Add a Solution

1 solution

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov · Answer 1 · 2014-09-21T20:37:00

Why not asking the author of this code? No one else can be help responsible for a solution in someone else's code.

The first thing which comes to my mind would be: due to the sloppiness of the developer. I see no reasons why such method should be static. Please see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/byxd99hx%28v=vs.90%29.aspx[^].

Some disclaimer: when I say "first thing which comes to my mind", I mean it. I cannot claim the code is really sloppy. This is just seems to be a generally bad sign to me, but the author could have a good reason. My main point is: it's a wrong idea to ask some strangers to explain the code they did not write. Instead, please learn the topic properly using the documentation I referenced.

—SA