how to get respose using httpclient in c#

Question

0.00/5 (No votes)

See more:

hi,
i have a written a piece of code which sends and receives request.

string val = objclient.GetAsync(struri).Result.RequestMessage.RequestUri.AbsoluteUri.ToString();

but when i run this i a loop for about 15 uri's it takes a lot of time.

for(int i =0;i<= 16;i++)
{
string val = objclient.GetAsync(uri[i]).Result.RequestMessage.RequestUri.AbsoluteUri.ToString();
}

Is there any way to optimize this piece of code.

Posted 23-May-13 19:00pm

rohit24c

Add a Solution

1 solution

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov · Answer 1 · 2013-05-23T19:19:00

Why through HttpClient? It's much easier to do via the class System.Net.HttpWebRequest:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.httpwebrequest.aspx[^].

The technique of getting a HTTP response is shown on the MSDN help page of its ancestor class System.Net.HttpRequest:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.webrequest.aspx[^].

The method is blocking and synchronous, which is much better I think. You can explicitly execute it in a separate thread, is needed; and this form of asynchronous behavior is much better, because you reuse the same methods of threading and thread synchronization again and again.

—SA