c code for hanoi tower

Question

1.00/5 (1 vote)

See more:

C

Ubuntu

How to write a c program for the tower of hanoi problem ?

Posted 6-Nov-12 18:58pm

supritha ravikumar

Updated 6-Nov-12 19:14pm

Tadit Dash (ତଡିତ୍ କୁମାର ଦାଶ)

v3

Add a Solution

1 solution

Add a Solution

Add your solution here

Treat my content as plain text, not as HTML

Preview 0

…

Existing Members

Sign in to your account

...or Join us

Download, Vote, Comment, Publish.

Your Email
Password
Forgot your password?

Your Email
This email is in use. Do you need your password?
Optional Password

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters

When answering a question please:

Read the question carefully.
Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
If a question is poorly phrased then either ask for clarification, ignore it, or edit the question and fix the problem. Insults are not welcome.
Don't tell someone to read the manual. Chances are they have and don't get it. Provide an answer or move on to the next question.

Let's work to help developers, not make them feel stupid.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

Tadit Dash (ତଡିତ୍ କୁମାର ଦାଶ) · Accepted Answer · 2012-11-06T19:13:00

Solution 1

Please check C code for Towers of Hanoi[^].
You will find the implementation.

But before asking question, you need to google[^] and find what are the useful links available for you. You will find tons of solution links.

Thanks...
Happy coding. :)

Posted 6-Nov-12 19:13pm

Tadit Dash (ତଡିତ୍ କୁମାର ଦାଶ)

Comments

enhzflep 7-Nov-12 1:37am

That's my 2. The intention seems good, so avoids my 1.

Reasons for my vote?
■ supritha ravikumar asked 'how to write a code for hanoi tower' - you gave a full solution
■ problems of this nature are almost exclusively homework. This further reinforces the need for an explanation of the required approach. Full solutions are actually counter productive in these instances.
■ There are solutions posted that are either wrong, misleading or just plain bad - these deserve a 1.
■ There are solutions that are truly mediocre - by definition, deserving a 3.

Finally, just as Solutions may be edited - so can votes. :nudge-nudge: (I don't like handing out low votes. I really LOVE revoting higher because a solution has been improved or includes factual correction)
A good explanation of a possible approach and considerations to be made would earn my +5.

Tadit Dash (ତଡିତ୍ କୁମାର ଦାଶ) 7-Nov-12 2:21am

Hi enhzflep,

Thanks enhzflep for your comments...
I understand that I need to explain the solution a little bit more.
As it is the quick answer section, so I posted links and adviced the OP to concentrate on googling and find the solution on his/her own. It was not one specific question, so I did not explained much.

I am sorry for that.
But the answer is now accepted by the OP. I think the solution given in that link worked fine and did not mislead the OP.
Sorry again if I done mistakes.

But you can think of upvoting again as this is accepted... :P :P :P

Thanks...
Tadit.

enhzflep 7-Nov-12 2:49am

Hi Tadit,
You're welcome - perhaps I was too hasty. The fact that it has been accepted should not be overlooked. I did note the google link(complete with search terms), that's much better than just "use google" like so many people say.

I don't think that you should be penalized for posting this (accepted) solution. I do however stand by my assertion that an explanation of an approach would constitute a really good answer.

To that end, I feel that 5 is too high. I also feel that other answers which don't quite deserve a 5 must receive a 4. As such I would feel a 4 for this solution would be unfair to those that just missed out on a 5.

Simon.

Tadit Dash (ତଡିତ୍ କୁମାର ଦାଶ) 7-Nov-12 2:56am

Thanks Simon...

Tadit Dash (ତଡିତ୍ କୁମାର ଦାଶ) 7-Nov-12 2:22am

Hi supritha,

Thanks for accepting the solution.

Regards,
Tadit