Click here to Skip to main content
15,896,912 members
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
0.00/5 (No votes)
See more:
I am just starting with programming computers,should i start with Windows 98API or windows 7's.
Posted

If you are on just "programming" the it would be same conceptually, just they differ by platforms. So win98 seems old and windows7 rules by .net, wpf etc what you see. But begin with solid fundamentals.
 
Share this answer
 
Comments
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 5-Jun-11 15:16pm    
Agree, my 5. but as to Win98, it's more to it.
Please see my answer.
--SA
hamidszaidii 6-Jun-11 2:40am    
i have little experience with c# so should i focus on windows7 as platform to learn.
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 6-Jun-11 11:50am    
You should use any of the NT-based platforms I mentioned in my answer (including Windows 7) and ***not focus*** on the platform-specific aspects.
Right, Dan?
--SA
Dan Suthar 6-Jun-11 12:33pm    
ya perfectly.. That don't even make sense at early stage. later on you can choose a platform of your preference
You should not start with either. You should start with a programming language before worrying about which version of the operating system you are going to work on. If you are primarily interested in Windows programming then I would suggest you learn C# first and move on to more advance concepts from there. This link[^] offers a great introduction to the C# language and .NET for Windows.
 
Share this answer
 
Comments
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 5-Jun-11 15:16pm    
Not quite agree, Windows 98 will be a huge waste of time.
Please see my answer.
--SA
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 6-Jun-11 2:48am    
Anyway, my 5 for the answer.
--SA
Kim Togo 6-Jun-11 13:02pm    
Good advice Richard, my 5.
Start with Window 7. You can also start with XP or Windows 2000, not earlier version. Avoid majorly failed Windows Vista.

Windows 98 presents no interest, even low historical interest. It was the time of overcoming a big crisis in programming after the software was dominated by so called real mode of Intel processors while hardware presented a fully fledged protected mode and paging, the only architecture really suitable for virtual memory. Windows 95 was the first system using 32-bit protected mode, but still combining it with real mode legacy and really unsafe. Windows 98 was insignificant step forward. You don't want all this nightmare. Also, don't even play with the idea of using Windows ME. Any Windows not using NT architecture (New Technology) does not worth any attention.

—SA
 
Share this answer
 
v2
Comments
Richard MacCutchan 6-Jun-11 4:29am    
Absolutely correct, and good advice. +5
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 6-Jun-11 11:11am    
Thank you, Richard,
--SA
Kim Togo 6-Jun-11 13:01pm    
Good advice about starting on Windows 7 and skip Windows 95, 98 and Me.

But I can not recognize what you say about Windows Vista is a fail.
Agree, that Windows Vista has it failures and can be slow. But after Service Pack 2 it performs very well, just like Windows 7.
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 6-Jun-11 13:09pm    
All right, thank you for this opinion. Perhaps Vista can be another acceptable variant. I still consider it as under-baked Windows 7. In contrast, XP and Windows 2000 has its own value -- better performance on slower machine.
--SA

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)



CodeProject, 20 Bay Street, 11th Floor Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2N8 +1 (416) 849-8900