|
When you check the "Do not treat <'s as HTML tags" option in the message editor, all HTML tags in your signature get displayed as non-HTML, even though signatures often have links that need to be treated as HTML tags. It would be nice if the tag option only affected the message text and not the signature associated with it.
"For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) ^ Blog
|
|
|
|
|
In the setting's page, the signature box would need it's own checkbox on whether to treat <> as tags or text.
"For that one fraction of a second, you were open to options you would never have considered. That is the exploration that awaits you. Not mapping stars and studying nebula, but charting the unknown possibilities of existence." - Q (Star Trek: The Next Generation) ^ Blog
|
|
|
|
|
I was just thinking it would be cool to have the soapbox listed under the lounge on the main page...
Just a thought, and I think it would solve some of the soapbox type threads that go on in the lounge.
Richard
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think most visitors would want to go near the SoapBox, the typical thread in there is not something CodeProject would want to advertise.
Everybody is entitled to my opinion
|
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
i thing it would be great if the options on the search page could be stored in a cookie or the user profile. every time i search i have to uncheck the "MFC / C++" and "ASP.NET" options, that's quite annoying.
|
|
|
|
|
When you try to vote again for an article, it should replace your previous vote with the new vote. That way, you can upgrade your vote, in case the article is updated and improved.
|
|
|
|
|
This is on the TODO at #130. No - I'm not kidding! 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
This is on the TODO at #130. No - I'm not kidding!
Wow! Can you post #1 - #129?
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote:
Wow! Can you post #1 - #129?
mE TOO waiting for that
-----------------------------
"I Think It Will Help"
-----------------------------
Alok Gupta
visit me at http://www.thisisalok.tk
|
|
|
|
|
We have article search option here in our CP.This is based on Articles or Authors. But we don't have any search option which will search and show the queries , answers submitted. What I mean is, I seen lot of doubts submitting every day in CP which is already submitted by others and answered already.
So if CP is providing 'message search' then users will search answers for their query and they will only submit if they didn't found any.Surly this will reduce the number of repetitive queries that submitting every day. And will also help to maintain site traffic.
Sreejith Nair
[ My Articles ]
|
|
|
|
|
sreejith ss nair wrote:
But we don't have any search option which will search and show the queries , answers submitted
At the top of every forum is a little magnifying glass icon with the words "Search Comments" next to it. If you press it you will be taken to a page where you can search through the forum.
Do you want to know more?
|
|
|
|
|
Browser customiztion is the screw here.
thanks
Sreejith Nair
[ My Articles ]
|
|
|
|
|
plz correct me if i am wrong bt why not to search CP with google? 
best regards,
David 'DNH' Nohejl
Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a matter of searching in google or some thing else. What i need to search all messages here in CP.
Sreejith Nair
[ My Articles ]
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it searches the forums? (I couldnt get any matches anyway).
Everybody is entitled to my opinion
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, you are right 
I complained to someone (not from CP) about poor searching on CP (long time ago) and reply was something like "why waste time wit it when most of people will use Google instead". So I kept in mind this reason... Suprisingly I never tried...
thx for correcting me.
best regards,
David 'DNH' Nohejl
Never forget: "Stay kul and happy" (I.A.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's a 'broken article?' link at the top left of all articles that is for reporting broken stuff. In this case, however, it's the site taxonomy that's warped. The fix is in the works.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote:
There's a 'broken article?' link at the top left of all articles that is for reporting broken stuff. In this case, however, it's the site taxonomy that's warped. The fix is in the works.
Duh! I don't know why the link didn't come to mind right off hand.
Best,
Jerry
"Making money is art and working is art and good business is the best art of all."--Andy Warhol
Toasty0.com
|
|
|
|
|
Hello All!
I have a doubt about how multicast conference works in
RTP.
Imagine a simple audio conference aplication where source A
sends data packets to 224.0.0.1:9000 (the source port
is 9000 too). Participants B and C can listen in port
9000, and send RTCP packets to port 9001.
Everything is clear up to here. But now, if
participant B starts sending audio datagrams, how can
A receive these datagrams, if port 9000 is used by the
transmitter?
|
|
|
|
|
This is not really a programming question, I think. What software, or technique, is used to show program animations in the articles?
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nishant S wrote:
(we do not allow flash or avi/mpg type animations).
And for that we are all grateful, my poor ISDN line wouldn't like it. 
Nishant S wrote:
You can use an animated gif
Animated gifs. I have those turned off in my browser, no wonder I haven't seen any animated articles.
Michael
CP Blog [^]
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
