|
Heath Stewart wrote:
Note to future employers - I do comment my code fully using common commenting syntax for easy API documentation!
Oops, almost forgot about them. I have started making an effort now ↓ 
//Start of joke
Never comment ur code. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand !!!
//End of joke
|
|
|
|
|
This would facilitate more discussion on how to improve the site.
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
|
|
|
|
|
Nah! the comments here are more specific to Codeproject and generally those ppl who are members of CP for a long time post here. So no point showing this to newcomers on the front page.
Generally the newcommers would come here with a question, so if they see one of their question on the question time, They would follow the thread.
God is Real, unless declared Integer.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I agree. My suggestion is withdrawn. Only the people who really care about and know the site come over here, and that's probably best.
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest the following as possibilities:
1) No voting on articles allowed until at least the achievement of bronze status
- Hopefully, this will reduce the incentive for people to create bullshit accounts
2) No inclusion of anonymous comments/questions in the "Question Time" sidebar
- Hopefully, this will reduce the incentive for people to post bullshit comments on their own articles
3) No anonymous posts allowed as the root of anything
4) No voting for the same article twice from the same IP address
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Varszegi wrote:
2) No inclusion of anonymous comments/questions in the "Question Time"
I don't agree with that one, it would unfairly exclude people asking for help in the topical forums. Maybe choose not to show article-messages in the question time instead?
Putting the laughter back into slaughter
|
|
|
|
|
What's the harm in requiring someone to log in to ask a question? If you forced people to take an extra minute to register, it would cut down on the quantity of garbage questions as well, don't you think?
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
|
|
|
|
|
For you, or me, it wouldn't pose any problem, but with so many sites requiring you to log in to access mediocre information a lot of people are very cautious about signing up with new web sites until they've had a chance to experience it. CodeProject would be preventing a large number of new visitors from using the site and hopefully becoming members.
Putting the laughter back into slaughter
|
|
|
|
|
I would say that the site could stand to be a little more selective. Some of the articles and comments posted lately don't seem to be very well received. I'm also pretty sure that a fair percentage of the million members are really David Stephen Rule in disguise.  I think that a site of this size is similar to a company, in that its strategies should change as it grows; it should no longer be focused on getting page hits at any cost, since it's so well known. I first came to CP because a colleague recommended it.
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Varszegi wrote:
1) No voting on articles allowed until at least the achievement of bronze status
I would agree with this one, except that votes are weighted already so surely the pre-bronze account doesn't carry a lot of weight once others start voting for something. Of course, if something only gets one vote then it doesn't matter the weighting of the voter.
Jeff Varszegi wrote:
2) No inclusion of anonymous comments/questions in the "Question Time" sidebar
I can see where you are coming from on this. But lots of people don't like the idea of signing up for things. It might put people off the site.
Jeff Varszegi wrote:
3) No anonymous posts allowed as the root of anything
I'd go with this one, but it does preclude #2 by default. So maybe, no anonymous initial posts in the Lounge, Soapbox & people's article forums might be better. [Actually - I think you must be signed in to post in the Lounge already]
Jeff Varszegi wrote:
4) No voting for the same article twice from the same IP address
Again, I can see where you are coming from on this, but what about companies where the external IP address will look the same no matter what internal address is used. And what about people who have Remote Desktop Connections, or can route through VPNs - they can be the same person but appear otherwise because they can route the request round different networks.
"You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want." --Zig Ziglar
Coming soon: The Second EuroCPian Event
|
|
|
|
|
4) No voting for the same article twice from the same IP address
Again, I can see where you are coming from on this, but what about companies where the external IP address will look the same no matter what internal address is used. And what about people who have Remote Desktop Connections, or can route through VPNs - they can be the same person but appear otherwise because they can route the request round different networks.
Yeah, you're right about that. But the thing is, people come to this site to ask their questions because they have a real need (or else they don't), so they're already on the hook. By getting people to sign up, you increase their sense of belonging to a community. That's been my feeling for a long time, and I think it's one reason that Code Project is more successful than the multitude of sites that let you pick any handle you want every time you post an anonymous message. You have personal force here because your messages, articles, etc. are all attached to your avatar.
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Varszegi wrote:
4) No voting for the same article twice from the same IP address
whats so big deal about voteing.... will you jump from the plane if you scored 1s in your comment/articles?
God is Real, unless declared Integer.
|
|
|
|
|
No, I won't "jump from the plane", but thanks for the snotty tone. Your comment's not very thoughtful. Either the voting system has merit and people care about it (and they do), or else it can be done away with altogether. People wouldn't compete for votes if they thought they were no big deal. They're a major feedback mechanism in the site, and they affect the ranking of articles, among other things. You haven't written articles, and people pretty often vote you 1 on your posts, so your attitude is understandable; it's just not very realistic.
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
|
|
|
|
|
yeah what ever makes you happy.
I give you 5.
God is Real, unless declared Integer.
|
|
|
|
|
 All I'm saying is this: in the old days, no email system had spam control, because there was no spam. Now it's a necessity; my main Yahoo address gets about a hundred spam messages a day! Also, I've noticed some people starting to grumble on CP because of the spam articles and suchlike things. I don't know what the best solution is. Also, I don't think you should change your posting style just because you get some ones-- I get them a fair bit myself, mostly because I refuse to be a Microsoft fanboy. I always call it like I see it.
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Varszegi wrote:
I always call it like I see it.
now you know why i get 1s many times... i have had my share of 5s too mostly in VC++ forum
God is Real, unless declared Integer.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Varszegi wrote:
4) No voting for the same article twice from the same IP address
This causes problems for people from the same company behind a NAT (such as myself and Ian Darling).
Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yep, I realize that now. You're right. There's probably no foolproof way to figure out someone's identity-- even sites like eBay have this problem, and they have the luxury of attaching people's identities to payment methods!
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest that a useful feature would be the ability to let people split their content into several pages, with a TOC/"you are here" feature on every page to let them bounce around. This is a pretty common feature on other sites, and would improve the general professionalism of Code Project (which is already high, of course).
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
[EDIT] Also, this could help spread out the load on the servers and decrease load times, which would make users even happier with the site. [/EDIT]
|
|
|
|
|
Jeff Varszegi wrote:
I suggest that a useful feature would be the ability to let people split their content into several pages
That sounds like a good idea. However, I'd also like to have to ability to see it all on one big page, because it is easier to print if it is one on HTML page rather than mess around clicking on the next page so many times and having it print one and an itty-bitty page each time.
"You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want." --Zig Ziglar
Coming soon: The Second EuroCPian Event
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. Actually, if a multi-page version were offered, I'd probably recommend more prominence for the "Print version" link on the left sidebar.
Regards,
Jeff Varszegi
|
|
|
|
|
I am new to RSS feeds. I've noticed that the code project only provides the RSS for ten latest articles. Isn't it possible to provide RSS for all submitted articles. I think it would be very useful.
Don't forget, that's Persian Gulf not Arabian gulf!
Murphy:
Click Here![^]
I'm thirsty like sun, more landless than wind...
|
|
|
|
|
If I am not wrong, latest ten articles should always cover all submitted articles. 
Never comment ur code. If it was hard to write, it should be hard to understand !!!
|
|
|
|
|
I think the smiley should be in this order.
;);P  omg:              ![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
God is Real, unless declared Integer.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
