Re: DataGrid, don't want the last row (new record), how to remove - C# Discussion Boards

Adding a button to IE's main toolbar?

Andreas Philipson19-Dec-03 8:43

Andreas Philipson

19-Dec-03 8:43

Is it possible to add a button to Internet Explorer's main toolbar (next to the "History"-button)?

Andreas Philipson

Re: Adding a button to IE's main toolbar?

Heath Stewart19-Dec-03 9:26

Heath Stewart

19-Dec-03 9:26

Not right next to the History button, no, but you can find information about adding buttons after the separator to the right of the History button here: Adding Toolbar Buttons[^].

Also, this isn't really the forum for this question.

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----

Inserting the same textbox in multiple controls

spindar19-Dec-03 7:44

spindar

19-Dec-03 7:44

Is there a way that I can create a copy of a textbox out of a TabPage and insert it into another TabPage. The way I've been trying is to add() the TextBox to the second TabPage but this removes it from the first.

I would really like for it to call the same TextChanged() function.

Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Matt

Re: Inserting the same textbox in multiple controls

Not Active19-Dec-03 8:01

Not Active

19-Dec-03 8:01

Point both textboxes at the same TextChanged handler

Re: Inserting the same textbox in multiple controls

Heath Stewart19-Dec-03 8:27

Heath Stewart

19-Dec-03 8:27

Mark's idea is a good one. I just wanted to add that a control can only have one parent. This is pretty much universal and goes down to the Windows Common Controls that pretty much each control in System.Windows.Forms wraps.

DataGrid, don't want the last row (new record), how to remove

Member 61691919-Dec-03 7:29

Member 616919

19-Dec-03 7:29

I have a datagrid and I want the data displayed and allow the user to select a record. But I don't want the blank last row displayed. I don't want them to be able to enter new data in this datagrid. This one is for selecting a record only.

Thanks for any help
Confused | :confused:

Re: DataGrid, don't want the last row (new record), how to remove

sthect19-Dec-03 8:00

sthect

19-Dec-03 8:00

append in your init :

MyDataGrid.ReadOnly = true;

Re: DataGrid, don't want the last row (new record), how to remove

Member 61691919-Dec-03 9:17

Member 616919

19-Dec-03 9:17

Sorry, I goofed on the problem description. I want to be able to type into the existing populated grid rows (to update them) but not have the blank new record entry at the bottom

Thanks for your help

Re: DataGrid, don't want the last row (new record), how to remove

dubor9-Jan-04 6:34

dubor

9-Jan-04 6:34

Hi, i'd also be interested in this, so if anybody knows...

Parsing an LDIF file without using ldifde or Active Directory

sonicflame19-Dec-03 6:10

sonicflame

19-Dec-03 6:10

Hello!

I'm having a bit of difficulty with an LDIF file that I need to parse for a piece of communications software I'm writing. The application will run on a non-networked machine in the field on Windows 2K. I had hoped to use MS's ADAM, but that requires Windows XP or 2003 Server to run. I don't need a directory per se, just to be able to parse the contents of the ldif file exported from the server into a tree- I know how to do this when connecting to a directory server, but am having difficulty with just a flat file. Is there a way to make the .NET DirectoryServices object "connect" to a file instead of to a server? I really, really don't want to have to write a parser for this beast.

Thanks!
Melissa

Entity point-to-point communication...suggestions

LongRange.Shooter19-Dec-03 5:11

LongRange.Shooter

19-Dec-03 5:11

I am starting to construct an experiment that will eventually contain evolutionary objects that follow genetic algorithmic coding.

The simple tasks always seem to be the hardest. Smile | :)

Each object is on an independant thread.
Each object of its' own type must be able to communicate with the others.
Each object must be able to communicate frequently with either specific entities (ie. 'neighbors') or all members of the group (but not via broadcast).

I know I need to do point-to-point but I'm not really sure of the best approach. The resulting web of connections between n number of entities could easily swamp a system.

A thought is that each entity listen on a specific port, can talk to only the neighboring ports, and a 'tell all' command would be telegraphed from entity to entity until the message has made it around to the initiator. I'm just not sure where to start on constructing this.

I've looked at the SDK for TCPListeners and TCPClients and it is a good start, but if anyone has experience with a p-t-p connection process I am all ears.

Thanks

_____________________________________________
_{The world is a dangerous place.
Not because of those that do evil,
but because of those who look on and do nothing.}

Re: Entity point-to-point communication...suggestions

Heath Stewart19-Dec-03 6:13

Heath Stewart

19-Dec-03 6:13

You should take a look at .NET Remoting. You get a lot more flexibility, and you could devise a system where the remoting server (could even be in your same process) keeps track of registered clients and sends commands to the right clients based on Type information (judging by your description) and remote method calls. There is some more complexity involved than simple socket programming, but you get a LOT more flexibility because you can chain message handlers (objects that act on message data or even change that message data) and do many other things (like even compressing the message data using a compression sync handler to and from a remote object).

There are several good articles here on CP, and you should get a book like MS Press's ".NET Remoting", which is a good beginner and intermediate book about .NET Remoting.

This way, your threads don't have to keep references to each other and can instead use a broker system through Remoting. You could also broker objects using ContextBoundObject classes, or even with a normal class, but using either remoting or a ContextBoundObject lets you capture messages (for method calls, return messages, etc.) before they are received or sent by the client or server.

Re: Entity point-to-point communication...suggestions

LongRange.Shooter19-Dec-03 7:14

LongRange.Shooter

19-Dec-03 7:14

Heath,

Believe me, I thought about doing that since it is so easy to do. But that ties them down to the server. The design concept behind the evolving code is for each construct to be an independant, evolving entity with evolution occuring by the 'swarm' through their own network. Each entity is eventually implemented with genetic algorithms to implement the evolution. I saw a hint of something somewhere that suggested a neural network, but I don't know if I want to construct one from scratch in .NET. (could be an interesting undertaking though)

So it will be more of a peer-to-peer communication without a server go-between. (I can always hold that remoting server as a First Build approach, but then I have to address this sooner or later.) I just have to figure out the best approach to take to start the networking --> and that is what I'm trying to figure out.

Thanks for the input!

_____________________________________________
_{The world is a dangerous place.
Not because of those that do evil,
but because of those who look on and do nothing.}

Re: Entity point-to-point communication...suggestions

Heath Stewart19-Dec-03 8:26

Heath Stewart

19-Dec-03 8:26

You've got a point, but remoting doesn't necessary have to be a client-server approach, each object would act as both - just communicating with each other. It might not work for your situation, though.

Re: Entity point-to-point communication...suggestions

LongRange.Shooter22-Dec-03 2:34

LongRange.Shooter

22-Dec-03 2:34

Heath,

The more I thought about this over the weekend, the more I liked it! Each entity could spawn a Communicator component with a fixed message format. For the initial behaviour test, we can make it a simple neural ring where each has a known neighbor (port number) and the last in the chain has the first entity as its' neighbor.

They can pass a standard, serializable message format with a header similar to the TCP packet header. So there is an indicator of the transmitter, receiver (specific or all), and the packet of data to be consumed. Once the packet travels the entire ring back to the originator, the originator communicator logic knows that it is his own and brings the communication circle to an end. (in the case of a non-directed message packet) And if the packet is directed then the movement of the packet stops at that point.

Better yet, we were planning on deploying the ant genetic algorithm in these guys once we knew we could monitor them, and this communication pattern matches the way ants communicate at a basic level. This also positions the entities to be started up independant of "Mom" which is our monitoring program.

Once the behaviour test works, then we incorporate the Ant genetics with swarming (the swarm behavior comes into play when the anthill is attacked). We can provide a digital representation of how the current communication pattern exists, then have the Ant Genetics determine the most efficient path for each to communicate with each other. (a similar method was deployed at a telecom company to determine the shortest route through the phone network for point-to-point) The ant genetic algorithms basically use the methods that the ants use to determine the path from the food they find for a shortest return trip to the anthill. Once they have the formula worked out we can deploy that at startup.

Thanks,

Michael

_____________________________________________
_{The world is a dangerous place.
Not because of those that do evil,
but because of those who look on and do nothing.}

Re: Entity point-to-point communication...suggestions

Giles19-Dec-03 8:59

Giles

19-Dec-03 8:59

I've been playing with the idea of multicasting .NET objects, by first serialising them to a Memory stream, and then well, multicasting them on a network for those that want to subscribe and listen.

This code snipet shows the kind of thing.

http://www.dotnetextreme.com/articles/multicasting.asp[^]

It would probably be best to deserilize to an Object, and then cast to the object type that is needed.

"Je pense, donc je mange." - Rene Descartes 1689 - Just before his mother put his tea on the table.

Shameless Plug - Distributed Database Transactions in .NET using COM+

Re: Entity point-to-point communication...suggestions

LongRange.Shooter22-Dec-03 9:24

LongRange.Shooter

22-Dec-03 9:24

Giles,

This looks interesting as a possibility. But I'm more inclined to implement .NET remoting for the first try. Remoting layers will handle the message packet serialization themselves. But I will keep this one on the back burner.

Michael

_____________________________________________
_{The world is a dangerous place.
Not because of those that do evil,
but because of those who look on and do nothing.}

Copy the structure of an Access table

Anonymous19-Dec-03 4:53

Anonymous

19-Dec-03 4:53

How do I simply copy the structure of an Access table to another table (no data included) using C#?

Thanks in advance.

Stored Procedure Return Value

Mazdak19-Dec-03 4:16

Mazdak

19-Dec-03 4:16

I have a stored procedure which have a return value and a output parameter .I know how to get the value of this parameter but I need to get value of return value too but I don't know how. Thanks

Mazy

No sig. available now.

Re: Stored Procedure Return Value

Heath Stewart19-Dec-03 5:03

Heath Stewart

19-Dec-03 5:03

On your SqlCommand, add a parameter (whatever name you want, the command builder typically uses @RETURN_VALUE if you want to be consistent). Set the direction parameter in the SqlParameter constructor (or use the Direction property after the SqlParameter is created) and set it to ParameterDirection.ReturnValue. Add this SqlParameter to the command's SqlCommand.Parameters collection. After executing the command, check the SqlParameter.Value.

Re: Stored Procedure Return Value

Mazdak19-Dec-03 5:59

Mazdak

19-Dec-03 5:59

Thanks for reply. I use the way you said but when I execute my code I got unhandled error which say my stored procedure expects parameter @RETURN_VALUE which was not supplied. If I delete the row that said Parmater.Direction is ReturnValue then this error does not occured but of course I don't get any return value.Should I add anything to my stored procedure defenition like the way I do for Output parameter?

Mazy

No sig. available now.

Re: Stored Procedure Return Value

Heath Stewart19-Dec-03 6:06

Heath Stewart

19-Dec-03 6:06

First, you have to make sure you're using a stored proc by setting the SqlCommand.CommantText to the stored proc name, and the SqlCommand.CommandType to CommandType.StoredProcedure. The line that the SQL builder outputs looks something like:

cmd.Parameters.Add(
  new SqlParameter("@RETURN_VALUE", SqlDbType.Int, 4,
    ParameterDirection.ReturnValue, false, ((Byte)(10)), ((Byte)(0)), "",
    DataRowVersion.Current, null));

You use check out the documentatoin for the respective SqlParameter constructor to see what everything means. Basically, a lot of parameters are just fillers so you could create the SqlParameter with the default constructor or a shorter constructor, then assign the properties the way you want.

You should also try playing around with the features that VS.NET provides, like using the Server Explorer to find the Stored Procedure you want and drag it to your form. You can also do this with SqlDataAdapter and many other things like tables (which is especially nice when making strongly-typed DataSet classes). Normally, I don't like "drag-n-drop programming" but in cases like this it sure saves a heck of a lot of time!

Re: Print word document without opening it.

Heath Stewart19-Dec-03 4:59

Heath Stewart

19-Dec-03 4:59

Apparently, PrintOut is not a blocking call, so it's trying to quit immediately after printing. You should check for optional parameters for the Quit method to see if you can override the prompt. I remember seeing one previously.

You should also use synchronous printing, if possible (depends on the COM implementation, so read the Word developer documentation). This should give time for Word to print and then you can quit.

As far as not showing the application, this has been covered before in this forum countless times. It has to do with using a ProcessStartInfo class in Process.Start. Search the comments (always a good idea to do first anyway) for more information.

How to winsdows service Programing????

h_wing19-Dec-03 3:46

h_wing

19-Dec-03 3:46

one Windos Service is making by C#.NET
when order to Stop service but Service is Some Processing... not Finish

so.. i want to Message Box ("Can not Stop Serveice") ..or

this service can not stop until Service is Some Processing Finish

i want to make

if (someprocessing finish)
{ service.Stop();}
else wait Service.Stop();

How to coding ~~ i do not know~~!!!!!

Re: How to winsdows service Programing????

Mazdak19-Dec-03 4:21

Mazdak

19-Dec-03 4:21

I don't know I get your problem correctly but this is I can tell you:

indows service has CanStop property,set it to false and after your proccessing finished set it to true.

CanStop = false;
if(job is done)
 CanStop = true;

Mazy

No sig. available now.

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.