|
|
That is not close to a specification.
In contrast I looked for "usb-c specification" and found one right away.
|
|
|
|
|
You asked for the wiring. That has the wiring.
As far as the size of the plug, that information is also available.
Even if you take exception to the way it is presented, your exception does not matter. The information is there.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: You asked for the wiring. That has the wiring.
No I asked for a "specification". I used that word as I expect it to be used.
For example RFC 9113 is one of the vast number of RFCs that specify how HTTP works.
And if I google for "usb-c specification" I find something that looks like a specification also. Perhaps not as independent as one would prefer but at least quite a few people agree to it.
And to get even more general as an example there is the "American wire gauge" which has a specification as well. It specifies the size of wire.
B258 Standard Specification for Standard Nominal Diameters and Cross-Sectional Areas of AWG Sizes of Solid Round Wires Used as Electrical Conductors[^]
What you provided looks like something that a hobbyist wrote up. And definitely not something that came from a standards body.
Noting of course that you use the word "standards".
Now might be the case that there is in fact no actual standard. If so then the fact that you were able to buy parts that mismatch is no surprising.
But if there is an actual standard then where is it?
|
|
|
|
|
It's a "de facto standard"
De facto standard - Wikipedia[^]
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
And thus mismatches are to be expected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's not proprietary, but I should have said defacto standard.
Many kits from different vendors also have these ports.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
I got interested in learning / working with automotive "standard" OBD.
So I ordered an OBD connector...
My OF and diabetes hands had a hard time joining the connector with OBD Mini Bluetooth adapter.
OBD Mini Bluetooth adapter works fine plugging into the car OBD outlet ...
The usual "excuse" - "they.." use metric...
|
|
|
|
|
Easier than fixing your teeth I'd imagine 
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 3/6
🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟩⬜⬜🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 2/6*
🟩⬜⬜🟩⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1.133 5/6
⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟨
⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 5/6*
🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜
⬜🟨🟩🟩⬜
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. -Frederick Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 5/6
🟩⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟩⬛⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 5/6
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,133 2/6*
🟩⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
|
But doesn't that already end up disqualified under "no throwing it away?" 
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Not according to Bezos... 
|
|
|
|
|
a.) I prepared a draft of a mail and send that as a reminder for myself with outlook to _me_.
b.) In the prepared mail text, I referred a person with '@this.person@that.company.com'.
c.) Again: The mail was only thought as a draft for me.
d.) What Outlook did: It added 'this.person@that.company.com' automatically to the receivers and that's what I missed 
c.) What Outlook did, is not that wrong, but that dangerous. In this case, I fortunately did not added my -sometimes- very special personal comments 
Finally:
I would prefer, that outlooks does not add a recipient automaticaly. I prefer it gives me a hint like 'there are refreneces not in the recipient list'. Similar like if you mention a attachment in the mail text and the mail does not have an attachment...
modified 26-Jul-24 13:06pm.
|
|
|
|
|
^ So much agreement here.
I don't want software to be too smart for its my own good.
[Edit]
I take that back.
A lot of times VS will tell me exactly what's wrong with a line of code. If you know what's wrong, and you know how to fix it...fix it[1]...please?
[1] But maybe ask me before you do it. I just don't want to have the same error listed 17 times, and have it rely on me to apply the same fix repeatedly...
|
|
|
|
|
VS is no problem if it tells me where I'm wrong and what I need to correct. All this is something private between VS and me.
But adding a recipient to a mail automatically (like Outlook did) surprised me very much. This time it was not dramatically, because I did not added some 'private' comments to my drafts.
Anyway I learned my lesson. means, 'take care, are you sure to send that mail'  
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed that the context here makes all the difference.
I'm not sure how someone at Microsoft decided it would be a good thing to have Outlook add a recipient on its own based on the content of a message. Especially without asking.
Cleary this guy has never done a Reply All when he meant to reply to a single person only.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
