|
lol...ok yes I can see that, but I am not sure that the person did it thought so.
After all he tried the lawsuit in two different countries.
|
|
|
|
|
Which, in my opinion, supports my thesis. Ensuring that both systems have a precedent for rejecting the application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imagine a situation wherein the Supreme Court itself uses an AI to decide whether another AI can be issued a patent.
|
|
|
|
|
During our recent house "floor remodeling " I had to move everything from my man cave.
In slow process of moving everything back I have discovered "AI expert systems" book...
I have never actually finished reading it , but this post brought up a question.
What is a "difference" in today AI concept(s) and the "old" neural network?
Or is there any ?
Don't they both make best guess based on data collected?
( If you feel I am hijacking the tread...)
|
|
|
|
|
Remember attending a few classes on AI, in 1989, 1990, at the Indian Institute of Science in Bengaluru, India. Where the Professor was using the first edition of this book
https://amzn.eu/d/8JPIHK2
Neural networks are around for eighty years now (1943 onwards).
I feel that, the major differences between then and now is in the computational power, which fostered the advent of deep learning, and such.
|
|
|
|
|
No. It is just a different method of pattern matching.
The term 'AI' now has been hijacked as a marketing term. It has nothing to do with the original definition nor really with the research on the subject that has been going on since the 1950s.
|
|
|
|
|
AI only does what you tell it to do. If you tell it to invent and teach it what that means and how that should be done it will follow your command. Instead of “invention” you could use the phrase “find a solution to a problem”
modified 23-Dec-23 5:11am.
|
|
|
|
|
looking for a PDF software to protect partially my paper until readers pay me a small amount of money.
googled around and did not find much.
any recommendations?
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Myself I have no idea how you could even do that 'partially' in terms of implementation. I doubt it is possible unless PDF already supports that.
I suspect you need two papers. The first is an abstract with a reference to the second. Which is basically what any normal paywall already does.
|
|
|
|
|
this is the way in my mind right now...
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Have you looked at Adobe?
Don't know what they are charging for the PDF document editing tools.
https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/hub/how-to-black-out-text-in-a-pdf-file.html
|
|
|
|
|
It's an illusion: the partially protected is actually a partial (sample) document used as promotional material. Once they pay, you send them a full copy ... with their name watermarked on it.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
|
|
|
|
|
I find an answer for this question here...
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
it must be quite a paper if it is worth cash . may i inquire please the subject . thank you kindly .
|
|
|
|
|
stock trading strategies and methods...
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
very impressive . may i inquire the obvious question id est have you yourself found the strategies and methods useful .
|
|
|
|
|
Cannot prevent them from taking a screenshot (or photograph) of the protected part, and openly publishing it, isn't it?
Even if such an infringement is detected, getting a favourable legal solution is most likely a long winded process, except for large companies.
|
|
|
|
|
for PDF file, these actions can be prevented...
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe PDF Unshare suits your needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: entropy
An Entro to Py
As the aircraft designer said, "Simplicate and add lightness".
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer - Release Version 1.3.0 JaxCoder.com
Latest Article: SimpleWizardUpdate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for this. My usual problem is they state 'the probability is this and that' but no explanation why it is 
|
|
|
|
|
In the case of the video, the probabilities were made up to create two different machines. They then went on to illustrate how you could calculate the information entropy for each machine to compare them. The machine with the lower calculated entropy was more predictable Or better organized. The higher the calculated entropy the more disorganized a system is, so it is harder to predict what the output of the next cycle will be.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
